Poll: Tony Blair as 'EU President'? Has the world gone mad?!?

Recommended Videos

dwightsteel

New member
Feb 7, 2007
962
0
0
iain62a said:
Hang on, what did you mean by the part about George Bush not actually being elected by the American people?

Just out of interest.
Al Gore straight up won the popular vote. The ever outdated Electoral College put Bush 2 in office.
 

iain62a

New member
Oct 9, 2008
815
0
0
dwightsteel said:
iain62a said:
Hang on, what did you mean by the part about George Bush not actually being elected by the American people?

Just out of interest.
Al Gore straight up won the popular vote. The ever outdated Electoral College put Bush 2 in office.
Ah, thanks. I don't know very much about the American political system.
 

D.C.

New member
Oct 8, 2008
228
0
0
I'm gonna predict london riots if Tony Blair actually gets to the position where hi is/is likely to be the EU president.
 

TheZapper

New member
Jul 11, 2009
721
0
0
I think that having Blair as EU president would very good from a British perspective as it would mean that Britain would have someone with an interest in the country in power for once. Despite what has been said by some already I think that Blair was a pretty decent PM (especially compared to Brown) , it's just a shame that the only thing he will be remembered for by most people is the Iraq war.
 

Jamous

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,941
0
0
Well some people hate me for being biased, and others agree entirely. That was impressive.
 

tomtom94

aka "Who?"
May 11, 2009
3,373
0
0
I suppose it could be worse. Gordon Brown could be EU president! *badumtish*
In fairness, Tony Blair does at the very least know the basics of politics. He's just awful at putting them into practice.
 

Jamous

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,941
0
0
And why I think he's corrupt (or maybe I just chose the wrong word). His government is, eventually, why we ended up with the current situation. I never said Brown was better at managing the country, but he inherited a lot of things from Blair. I have a feeling that he spent a LOT on his expenses whilst in government, seeing that he had all of them destroyed. He was dragged along by Bush into a war no-one wanted (maybe not corruption but still).
He seemed to be able to talk his way out of anything, either laying the blame with others or simply claiming that somehow there is nothing to blame about (when there was). Whether this is actually true is another matter, but, to me, he seemed to be able to slip out of anything (except the Iraq War, which is probably why he's remembered for it.)
I can see everyone's point about the poll, it was kind of just tacked on at the end. Glares liquid hatred was actually directed at myself not Blair.
 

Nickolai77

New member
Apr 3, 2009
2,843
0
0
I think Tony Blair would make a capable EU president- he is a skilled, and manipulative politican (tbh, i think Gordon Brown may have taken a few leaves from his book, looking at how he survived Labours attempt to get rid of him) Hes internationally well known- i dont agree with what he did (The Iraq War) and politically he is baisically labours version of Margret Thatcher- just more subtle.

I'm also in favour of an elected European president- its more democratic. The current President of the EU is the President (or pm. i dont know) of Sweden. Before that Czechsloviakia's president was in charge, and before that Sarcozy of France. So, the people of Europe do not have any say in who is in charge.

If elected, i think Tony Blairs first priority should be to cut back on unnessary leglisation and beauracracy, and get another treaty passed through the EU parliment which draws a clear line between the powers of the EU and the powers of it's individual states. Hopefully this would set Europe on a firm foundation- and put to rest some of the fears of the British and other EU skeptic countries.
 

SsilverR

New member
Feb 26, 2009
2,012
0
0
Cpt_Oblivious said:
So... you don't like Blair?
the way he sucked bush's dick was kind of the "i don't respect this guy anymore" moment for me ......................... but really ... ah fuck here comes the contradiction ... every ideal of his .. i 100% agree with .. him for EU prez ... i don't know enough to even be qualified to form an opinion .. but from what i know now ... the unqualified opinion is yes
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
iain62a said:
dwightsteel said:
iain62a said:
Hang on, what did you mean by the part about George Bush not actually being elected by the American people?

Just out of interest.
Al Gore straight up won the popular vote. The ever outdated Electoral College put Bush 2 in office.
Ah, thanks. I don't know very much about the American political system.
People call it outdated but since Obama won all of a sudden its the best system in the world again.

In other words it only works if the person you liked won. If not... THEN its a broken system.
 

koichan

New member
Apr 7, 2009
218
0
0
tk1989 said:
Eh? what was wrong with Blair?! he was brilliant! he accomplished quite a bit in his time in office.
Such as?

Sorry, i just can't think of a single thing he's ever done that was a good decision.

Only thing i begrudgingly respect him for is the skill he showed abandoning ship just before the s**t hit the fan for the economy.
 

Eskay

New member
Sep 2, 2007
303
0
0
petrolinus said:
Very nice post, and welcome to the Escapist. Good to have some actual explanation on this post rather than simple "back off brussels!" or "argh, Blair" reactions.

While I agree with your assessment of why Europe would reject Blair (though frankly you could have stopped at his nationality), I do think he would make a very good President. Mainly is his charisma, there's nothing worse that a drab leader, it makes sound policies flounder for lack of interest (yes, you Ban Ki-Moon). Blair would provide a political nexus that could bring the EU into a greater international position.

Secondly, this (sort of):

Nickolai77 said:
If elected, i think Tony Blairs first priority should be to cut back on unnessary leglisation and beauracracy, and get another treaty passed through the EU parliment which draws a clear line between the powers of the EU and the powers of it's individual states. Hopefully this would set Europe on a firm foundation- and put to rest some of the fears of the British and other EU skeptic countries.
He's high profile enough to actually get through to people directly. The EU is corrupt because no one scrutinises, no one scrutinises it through general lack of diplomatic involvement. More people being involved would hopefully shed more light onto the workings of the system and clean it up a little. With more scrutiny, people would become better able to trust the EU more, and so scepticism would be reduced.

As an aside I don't think Blair would be the man to define powers between countries better. He is an individual that craves attention, and thrives off publicity. He was a fiercely independent leader as PM as that served his needs, and focussed power onto him. National independence (RE foreign policy) was largely a bi-product of this. As EU pres he would likely advocate greater EU control, centralising not out of ideology, but simply as it makes him the fulcrum of power yet again.

And there for the grace of mixed metaphors go I.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
dwightsteel said:
george144 said:
I quite liked Blair, good speaker, did a lot of good things, his only really big mistake being to pander to an idiot that wasn't actually elected by the American people, like a spineless coward who was content to be lead around as if on a leash. I think it'd be great to have a charismatic British speaker as the head of a largely useless organisation.
Fixed. Sorry to the Blair lovers out there.
You're not sorry at all, you filthy liar.

And anywho, how about a "I don't have a clue" option?
 

Private Custard

New member
Dec 30, 2007
1,920
0
0
From this point forth, if anyone states on the news that 'the UK' has done or said something, chances are we havent.........the corrupt and spineless cunts supposedly running this country (into the ground) have. Citizens of the UK have no voice, we may as well scream in an airless vacuum for all the good it'll do.

Ah well, at least there's one bit of good news today, Cherie Blair has swine flu, with any luck it'll kill her.
 

koichan

New member
Apr 7, 2009
218
0
0
Private Custard said:
From this point forth, if anyone states on the news that 'the UK' has done or said something, chances are we havent.........the corrupt and spineless cunts supposedly running this country (into the ground) have. Citizens of the UK have no voice, we may as well scream in an airless vacuum for all the good it'll do.
Sadly true...
:(