Poll: ?Trusted? Game Companies/Developers

Recommended Videos

Dys

New member
Sep 10, 2008
2,343
0
0
I'm more likely to trust or distrust a game because of the publisher than I am the actual developer, either way I tend play games before I buy them (direct sequels being the only real exception).
 

MurderousToaster

New member
Aug 9, 2008
3,074
0
0
As the most obvious choice on the planet: Valve. They have yet to make a game that can be classed as 'sub-par' to their previous ones, and have yet to let their fans down.

As another one: I trust Blizzard quite a lot. They're probably my second-favourite developer (behind Valve) for their work on the Warcraft, Diablo and Starcraft series.
 

Schlagwerk

New member
Nov 5, 2009
107
0
0
Valve and Harmonix. I used to hold Blizzard in the same regard, but World of Warcraft and the Activision merger have knocked them down a few levels.
 

Super Toast

Supreme Overlord of the Basement
Dec 10, 2009
2,476
0
0
Naughty Dog has never ever ever ever ever ever ever made a bad game. Ever. So I trust them.
 

Anticitizen_Two

New member
Jan 18, 2010
1,371
0
0
Mimsofthedawg said:
Yeah, that makes sense. It's very true that with big developers, most of their games are shit. It happens with Nntendo, EA, and other developers. Whether or not someone is able to look past the shit and trust them on big-name titles is up to that person.

The Wii, as you said, pushes the envelope on what games can do, and I would define that as being cutting-edge (especially because both Microsoft and Sony are rushing to use the same technology), but that's really just your opinion. As long as you recognize that they were definitely cutting edge between 1985 and 1998, I'm fine.
 

Anticitizen_Two

New member
Jan 18, 2010
1,371
0
0
Mimsofthedawg said:
Anticitizen_Two said:
Mimsofthedawg said:
Yeah, that makes sense. It's very true that with big developers, most of their games are shit. It happens with Nntendo, EA, and other developers. Whether or not someone is able to look past the shit and trust them on big-name titles is up to that person.

The Wii, as you said, pushes the envelope on what games can do, and I would define that as being cutting-edge (especially because both Microsoft and Sony are rushing to use the same technology), but that's really just your opinion. As long as you recognize that they were definitely cutting edge between 1985 and 1998, I'm fine.
Oh, of course they were between 85 and 98! And as far as the Wii, I understand what you're saying. I think we actually believe the Wii has done the same things for the industry, we just use two different words to define the same thing.

And for the record, Nintendo will forever be my favorite game company. They were my first game love, and something like that never goes away - especially when they continue to push out good games; even if it is only once in a blue moon (in my opinion)
I agree with about everything you said there. We're probably just looking at the term "cutting-edge" in a different way.
 

Leviathan_

New member
Jan 2, 2009
766
0
0
Valve and Bioware.


Only 2 that I trust.

EDIT: wow Valve and Bioware seem to be really trusted here.
 

Novania

New member
Feb 5, 2009
536
0
0
Valve.
They gave me Steam, Half Life Series, Portal, Counter Strike, Left 4 Dead, Team Fortress 2, etc.

I hate Nintendo ever since making the Wii