It didn't receive an award, it was just featured in a montage with many other films of the genre. The same montage featured a scene from Misery which isn't really a horror movie, either (a thriller, at best.)
Was it ever meant to be a horror movie though? And if it was, is it worthy of being honoured amongsted what some would consider to be classic horror movies?BonsaiK said:I don't see what the big deal is. It's just a movie. Some people like it, some don't. So what? Most horror movies are frankly crap anyway, there's only a tiny handful of genuinely good ones.
It's got "vampires" in it (of a sort), and it's really popular. The people doing the montage probably figured that was good enough. Some of the other films in the montage weren't strictly "horror" either (depending on whose definition of the term you're using).Jim Grim said:Was it ever meant to be a horror movie though? And if it was, is it worthy of being honoured amongsted what some would consider to be classic horror movies?BonsaiK said:I don't see what the big deal is. It's just a movie. Some people like it, some don't. So what? Most horror movies are frankly crap anyway, there's only a tiny handful of genuinely good ones.
it was... nooooooyersimapestis said:oh yes, wasnt the new transformer movie a blockbuster?Burningsok said:MY god, this is a joke, it has to be. Twilight isn't even a horror movie. Sparkling does NOT = horror. No way can it be compared to any of those great horror movies listed above, they aren't in the same genre let alone the same league even though the characters in general are of horror nature, but the movie over all is not horror. Goes to show that for the media the more money a movie makes the better the movie must be... it's TOTAL bullshit.
"suicide"