Poll: Video Games and Horror Movies: Does Japan do it better?

Recommended Videos

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
What? No nod for Sweeeeeeden? As for horror games, I think its safe to say they win hands down.

As for film, Honestly, I am not in any way shape or form impressed with Japans horror offerings. Honestly Ringu and Ong Bak (or whatever the proper translation for the Grudge is) were pretty standard fare as far as fright is concerned. Its really more that they were different than what we were used to at the time when they came out.

I think another component of this that might be missed is the setting. Japan "MIGHT" have an edge if you are watching it on a television in your home. However I think the US has more of an edge when it comes to in theater horror films. The production values seem higher, The cinematography also plays a massive role. If you watch a horror film in a US theater within the range of rows say 5-10 when your eye will not be able to focus on every thing going on in shot is when you see the difference and get more of the effect. Even mediocre horror flicks like The Descent in that situation do more to illicit a few good jolts. But most importantly to me is ambiance, which I dont think the asian horror flicks can hold a candle to. (But vote of confidence to the UK for bringing us 28 days later. Thanks guys, your the best :) )
 

OldGus

New member
Feb 1, 2011
226
0
0
Dreiko said:
I remember playing silent hill 1 back in 1998 together with my dad...and the scariest bits were the ones without monsters, where you just walked from one place to another, feeling unaware. He'd poke me to startle me during those parts and it would be so very effective, that game just put you in that mind-space. Few games can have such power over you...and no other has had that effect on me.
(Ok, read enough to understand that the first bits you were pointing out were not horror games you thought were done well.)
Japanese horror games I've always thought of as not over the top, mainly. That being said, a game from a Western producer that did that for me was not even in the horror Genre... it was Thief Deadly Shadows (I think the third in the series.) It was specifically on the mission in The Cradle (aka, run of the mill Victorian Era loony bin.) Most of the time you spent in it was alone and disoriented because it was full of many turns and rooms and levels, and a lot of those turns limited your visibility and hearing, so it was hard to tell something was around the next corner, or how close it really was. Then you got to read the doctors' reports, describing things that to the mind of the period would seem necessary or logical treatments, but to the current mind seems only like torture, and you also realize that a lot of the people in there were probably sane when they went in (back then, you could be legally confined to a funny farm for any number of reason including being poor and unemployed... yes, that joke in Futurama was based on something real.)
Then there's the part where you actually have to become[/] one of the patients as you go back in time to find out what happened to this dead little girl you've been following, and then
you escape in that time by suicide
Needless to say, when I had my headphones on so the only world was the world onscreen, I was rather jumpy.
 

oplinger

New member
Sep 2, 2010
1,721
0
0
OldGus said:
oplinger said:
OldGus said:
oplinger said:
..I don't really think horror is that great anyway. It's all pretty stupid in its own ways. When I see a horror movie, the first thing I think about, is a roller coaster. Not because it's a thrilling nonsensical journey into horrorland that will leave me sweating and weeping into my palms. I just imagine a sign up front "YOUR SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF MUST BE THIS BIG TO WATCH" it's always something really outrageous too.

That's for all horror. So, this whole question is just silly to me.
This response I find something understandable for the horror of the fantastic (and for that I include Silence of the Lambs), but what about horror of the down-to-earth variety? I know there aren't many, but say an example where both the situation people are in and the circumstances of how they got there are reasonable enough that you could see it happening to you?
And what would your examples be for "down to earth" horror?
I see you like to address the problem head on.
Unfortunately almost anything of the "down-to-earth" variety is instead something based on real-life crimes, and therefore filed under the "Crime Drama" genre. And even then, ones that could be convincingly turned into something scary, like for example that abomination based on the Zodiac Killer in California, end up being poorly done or poorly written, such that characters are hard to relate to, and are too often told from the perspective of the investigator, not the victims or prospective victims.
If there was such a thing as a realistic crime drama from the perspective of the victims, that I would call a down-to-earth horror. Given this hypothetical at least, I'm sure you'd still find them hard to believe and not scary, though. That would require admitting that you feel you yourself have some weakness a criminal could exploit.
So...no examples. That's why I asked, I can't think of anything that fit the bill of "down to earth horror" in that it's believable.

Crime Drama is called "Drama" for a reason. If it's based on real events, they're skewed way out of proportion to be more entertaining. Things are changed to be more scary or shocking (mostly shocking.) They fit more into the "thriller" genre. Which is suspenseful, but not scary. Horror usually tries to evoke disgust, or startle the viewer/player. Which even so isn't really horror by the definition of the word.

Sadly though you're right. Having an exploitable weakness is what makes horror scary. I have to scare me. You can't.

That's why I believe films and video games cannot be scary. The scare is up to you, they just try to make you scare yourself. Tense moments, jump scares, anything to keep you on edge, so that you think about it, slowly whittle away at your own self-security, slowly moving into paranoia as you check dark corners for murderous demons and serial killers. But as you're in no real danger, they are completely incapable of being scary by themselves. That's what makes horror a terrible yet amazing genre. It's different for everybody.
 

Blue Musician

New member
Mar 23, 2010
3,344
0
0
NeutralDrow said:
Some types of video game and horror, to be sure. And there's still a lot of cross-pollination and less-characteristic excellent samples on all continents.

I could stereotype Japan as being the masters of cerebral horror, but since I hate horror, I would be pulling that out of my ass, or possibly just echoing Yahtzee. I could name certain types of games, but citing action games as a Western strength would lead me to pointing out Devil May Cry, and citing storytelling as an Eastern strength would lead me to pointing out Planescape Torment.
Wasn't DMC a Jap game?

OT: I cannot really say for sure. I really like Jap horror games, but some Western/European games are just bloody great!
 

pyramid head grape

[Game-Over]
Feb 4, 2011
21,907
0
0
How ever came up with penumbra and amnesia are just great at there horror XD
went with Japan here I wonder why I will give you a clue
<----------{
 

plugav

New member
Mar 2, 2011
769
0
0
Let's face it: hardly anyone makes good horror films. Most of my favourites, though, were made by European directors.

Games? There are certain genres that Japan does better (fighting games, survival horror) but, being more of an RPG person and a PC gamer, I prefer Western titles.
 

Arcticflame

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,063
0
0
Generally I think:
US - Games.
Japan - Horror films.

But they aren't miles ahead of each other in either field.
 

SinisterGehe

New member
May 19, 2009
1,456
0
0
American horror is: something in which you have a gun and there something in the shadows you must kill. Japanese horror is: There is something in the shadows trying to kill you, but it really doesn't try to kill you, but you think it tries to kill you, but does it try to kill you.

American horror tends to be more like splatter or gore really, just a example F.E.A.R series, it had horror elements but at the end of the day it was just another shooter.

A good western horror, would be Penumbra or Amnesia series.
 

TiefBlau

New member
Apr 16, 2009
904
0
0
OldGus said:
oplinger said:
OldGus said:
oplinger said:
..I don't really think horror is that great anyway. It's all pretty stupid in its own ways. When I see a horror movie, the first thing I think about, is a roller coaster. Not because it's a thrilling nonsensical journey into horrorland that will leave me sweating and weeping into my palms. I just imagine a sign up front "YOUR SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF MUST BE THIS BIG TO WATCH" it's always something really outrageous too.

That's for all horror. So, this whole question is just silly to me.
This response I find something understandable for the horror of the fantastic (and for that I include Silence of the Lambs), but what about horror of the down-to-earth variety? I know there aren't many, but say an example where both the situation people are in and the circumstances of how they got there are reasonable enough that you could see it happening to you?
And what would your examples be for "down to earth" horror?
I see you like to address the problem head on.
Unfortunately almost anything of the "down-to-earth" variety is instead something based on real-life crimes, and therefore filed under the "Crime Drama" genre. And even then, ones that could be convincingly turned into something scary, like for example that abomination based on the Zodiac Killer in California, end up being poorly done or poorly written, such that characters are hard to relate to, and are too often told from the perspective of the investigator, not the victims or prospective victims.
If there was such a thing as a realistic crime drama from the perspective of the victims, that I would call a down-to-earth horror. Given this hypothetical at least, I'm sure you'd still find them hard to believe and not scary, though. That would require admitting that you feel you yourself have some weakness a criminal could exploit.
Yes, I guess you can say Japan cannot claim superiority over a genre of horror that is entirely theoretical.

You seem to be arguing that classification is what bars certain brands of horror in which the West is superior, so here's a very simple rule of thumb: If it isn't scary, it isn't horror.

Now, you can label this with a variety of extenuating circumstances like culture clashes, familiarity, etc. But the fact is that it can be critiqued beyond borders, and the general trend is that Japanese horror is oftentimes better.
 

JLML

New member
Feb 18, 2010
1,452
0
0
Sweden. Just because of anything by Frictional Games. ^^

Other than that, I'd say Japan. Japanese horror films are truly scary, especially compared to the popular crap which only is gore and blood everywhere. I call that disgusting rather than scary.

Then again, USA wins in literature, if only for Lovecraft. ^^
 

tigermilk

New member
Sep 4, 2010
951
0
0
My favourite horror films are to diverse to tie to one country:

Repulsion (Polanski 1964), Psycho (Hitchcock 1960), Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (McNaughton 1986), Frankenstein Created Woman (Fisher 1967), Eyes Without a Face (Franju 1960).

My favourite horror games is a rather narrow list:

Resident Evil 2: While produced by Capcom a Japanese company the white protagonists, American setting and conventional narrative made it feel very American/Western on one hand but on the other the gradual building of tension could be cited as a more Japanese feel).

Silent Hill: Perhaps the most "Japanese" of my favourite horror games ("Japanese" as filtered through my Western gaze. Japanese in terms of unnerving imagery and a gradual building of terror, but the sense of loss and alienation felt to me indebted to French existentialism and German Expressionism.

Dead Space and Manhunt produced by Western companies America and England respectively (as far as I know) are both (like RE2) brilliant visceral games that would be pretty hard to improve on.

So in summary, mix of a number of options.
 

OldGus

New member
Feb 1, 2011
226
0
0
TiefBlau said:
You seem to be arguing that classification is what bars certain brands of horror in which the West is superior, so here's a very simple rule of thumb: If it isn't scary, it isn't horror.

Now, you can label this with a variety of extenuating circumstances like culture clashes, familiarity, etc. But the fact is that it can be critiqued beyond borders, and the general trend is that Japanese horror is oftentimes better.
(Not entirely sure which of the two that was specifically aimed at, however...) If you look at my longer post earlier in the forum, you will see that I don't intend to bar Western or Eastern horror, mainly because I see both as being validly scary to both audiences in differing circumstances and for differing reasons. If you look further at my conversation with oplinger, neither of us mentioned Japan at all, and the theoretical nature of my hypothetical example for oplinger to see if that situation in a video game or movie would be scary for him unfortunately bars any country's videogames or movies, excepting the provision of an example. If you have an example of any videogame or movie that satisfies the conditions of that example, that would be most welcome as it could be suggested to oplinger and help to further our discussion.
I do see a problem with the classification of "If it isn't scary, it isn't horror" in that it becomes entirely subjective socially, culturally, and in the case of oplinger definitely, personally, sometimes to the point that a discussion of this nature can't be had.
I do agree that it can be critiqued beyond borders, but that is specifically where the "which is better" discussion breaks down. Certainly recently, a lot of the best (in the West) horror movies have come from Japan, or been remade from Japanese films, but as far as games, there are many other countries whose games rate top-tier in horror. That being said, many recent horror movies from America are actually very popular overseas, despite the abundance of gore that doesn't scare or satisfy many American movie-goers. In the West, as I imagine you would agree, the fantastic is quickly becoming cliche, especially in America where most games focus on shooting and most recent movies on gore and drama, while the cultural motifs of Japanese horror that are familiar in Japan, are strange enough to entice and scare in your country. But still, as an overall look at the medium, there are few that compete with minds like Hitchcock, outdated though the technology appears now (seriously... watch "The Birds" and just lose yourself there for a moment. Also consider that bird attacks are something that certain areas of the world have to deal with regularly). As for the medium of videogames, I would look more towards smaller studios rather than AAA from any country for immersive horror experiences. The original Silent Hill series, Fatal Frame, the early successes in the medium that did come from Japan, had their run, and now the playing field is evening out (except for AAA America. I mean, really...). Still, it all comes down to subjectivity and personal views.

That being said, looking at another, earlier post, you will note that one of my most immersive and scary horror experiences with a game was not even with a game anyone would classify as horror, even with the broadest of definitions, and with a game most would say wasn't even good.

oplinger said:
So...no examples. That's why I asked, I can't think of anything that fit the bill of "down to earth horror" in that it's believable.

Crime Drama is called "Drama" for a reason. If it's based on real events, they're skewed way out of proportion to be more entertaining. Things are changed to be more scary or shocking (mostly shocking.) They fit more into the "thriller" genre. Which is suspenseful, but not scary. Horror usually tries to evoke disgust, or startle the viewer/player. Which even so isn't really horror by the definition of the word.

Sadly though you're right. Having an exploitable weakness is what makes horror scary. I have to scare me. You can't.

That's why I believe films and video games cannot be scary. The scare is up to you, they just try to make you scare yourself. Tense moments, jump scares, anything to keep you on edge, so that you think about it, slowly whittle away at your own self-security, slowly moving into paranoia as you check dark corners for murderous demons and serial killers. But as you're in no real danger, they are completely incapable of being scary by themselves. That's what makes horror a terrible yet amazing genre. It's different for everybody.
I do agree with the last part that the sheer personal level of horror is what makes it horrible to some and great to others.

Personally for me, a good horror is anything where I can put my self in and lose myself in the experience, where the terrors are constant, rather than sudden and jumpy, the fear and insecurity of what is around the next corner is more scary than the actual terror lurking there. I used to act for much of school, and I still do story-telling. I personally find the best horror is the kind you make for yourself out of the materials given, especially if you start by acting like the character in the story. Especially for story-telling or videogames, it ends up being a white-knuckled, entertaining experience for all involved... usually.

I offer a small, possible solution, in an analysis of the conversation thus far. Perhaps, its not as much a problem with suspending disbelief as much as a problem with connecting to the character. If you can separate yourself from you for a short while, a lot of games or movies become scary, even if they are not horror. Perhaps the best for this would instead of regular, fantasy horror, or serial killer horror, maybe be psychological horror, and games would definitely be better than film (since the interactivity already requires some degree of immersion). This is only a suggestion though, take it with a grain of salt.

That being said, what is the closest a game or movie, or even book, has come to scaring you (or helping you scare yourself)?
In a different vein, can you think of a film or game that isn't horror, but could be if told from a different perspective? For me, it'd be "The Professional" from the perspective of only the dirty DEA cops.
 

TiefBlau

New member
Apr 16, 2009
904
0
0
OldGus said:
(Not entirely sure which of the two that was specifically aimed at, however...) If you look at my longer post earlier in the forum, you will see that I don't intend to bar Western or Eastern horror, mainly because I see both as being validly scary to both audiences in differing circumstances and for differing reasons. If you look further at my conversation with oplinger, neither of us mentioned Japan at all, and the theoretical nature of my hypothetical example for oplinger to see if that situation in a video game or movie would be scary for him unfortunately bars any country's videogames or movies, excepting the provision of an example. If you have an example of any videogame or movie that satisfies the conditions of that example, that would be most welcome as it could be suggested to oplinger and help to further our discussion.
Being that this is an entertainment medium, there's no real proof of concept until one is actually made and shown to work which, as far as I have seen, it hasn't.
OldGus said:
I do see a problem with the classification of "If it isn't scary, it isn't horror" in that it becomes entirely subjective socially, culturally, and in the case of oplinger definitely, personally, sometimes to the point that a discussion of this nature can't be had.

I do agree that it can be critiqued beyond borders, but that is specifically where the "which is better" discussion breaks down. Certainly recently, a lot of the best (in the West) horror movies have come from Japan, or been remade from Japanese films, but as far as games, there are many other countries whose games rate top-tier in horror. That being said, many recent horror movies from America are actually very popular overseas, despite the abundance of gore that doesn't scare or satisfy many American movie-goers. In the West, as I imagine you would agree, the fantastic is quickly becoming cliche, especially in America where most games focus on shooting and most recent movies on gore and drama, while the cultural motifs of Japanese horror that are familiar in Japan, are strange enough to entice and scare in your country. But still, as an overall look at the medium, there are few that compete with minds like Hitchcock, outdated though the technology appears now (seriously... watch "The Birds" and just lose yourself there for a moment. Also consider that bird attacks are something that certain areas of the world have to deal with regularly). As for the medium of videogames, I would look more towards smaller studios rather than AAA from any country for immersive horror experiences. The original Silent Hill series, Fatal Frame, the early successes in the medium that did come from Japan, had their run, and now the playing field is evening out (except for AAA America. I mean, really...). Still, it all comes down to subjectivity and personal views.

That being said, looking at another, earlier post, you will note that one of my most immersive and scary horror experiences with a game was not even with a game anyone would classify as horror, even with the broadest of definitions, and with a game most would say wasn't even good.
You can say the same about the quality of just about any game in existence, and in all cases, you'd still be wrong.

Yes, entertainment is subjective. But it has rules. And general consensuses (Christ that is an ugly word). It's why Yahtzee has a job and we often agree with him. Granted, rules are meant to be broken, and the quality of things is, as you said, subjective, but you can say that about all entertainment and it'd get you nowhere. It's expected that you use the word "better" with a pinch of salt. You seriously don't need to invalidate the claims of all judgment of quality based on the existence of subjectivity. And if you can't generalize or use a rule of thumb, you're clearly incapable of the most basic of human cognitive functions and therefore evidence the first telltale signs of android artificial intelligence.
 

EllEzDee

New member
Nov 29, 2010
814
0
0
Japanese horror films are fucking horrific. The Japanese "Ringu" still haunts me.
Japanese video games generally revolve around turn based combat, lengthy cut scenes, angsty pre-teens and schoolgirls with next to no clothing on.

US horror films generally involve someone jumping out of a closet and shouting ooga booga wooga with a knife out and a scary mask on. They fucking suck.
US video games revolve around marines(or space marines) with a gung ho patriotic accent and personality, leaking testosterone out of their nipples. Once again, they generally fucking suck.

UK horror films are usually set in working class environments and usually go overboard with the "grit". They're usually only scary because they're set in familiar environments.
As for video games, they have no cookie cutter formula for making games like the other two entrants above. The few British video games i've played have been good, however, so i voted for them.

The only Canadian games i've played are from Relic, and they're fucking awesome, but i've never seen a Canadian horror film, so you don't get my vote.

In summary, Japan for the horror films, the rest of the world besides the US for the video games. Video games from the EU (including the UK) are usually the best.
 

roostuf

New member
Dec 29, 2009
724
0
0
Japan has a totally different culture to ours so what we find strange or weird is normal to them.