Well, that depends on how well the designers of said tricorder understand human biology. Of course, in the real world, we don't, which is largely why you can't test for everything. (That, and many tests we do have require raw materials which are consumed in the process, time and lots of equipment to perform.)gideonkain said:Hell ya it was, as soon as that happened I filed the movie under "one time watch" - your on an alien planet and a little machine says the air is fine? It's an Alien Planet?!?!, you don't know if everyone died due to the fast acting air borne virus, or if the spores of the mushrooms cause your skin to melt.
How would technology be able to identify alien organisms as contagious viruses? Their ALIEN, as in unfamiliar.Odbarc said:They said the air was breathable. So that mean's it's contagion free as well. Why would an advanced society/civilization have something that has a yes/no breathable meter scanning device that doesn't include air born viruses too?
If you ever find yourself in a hazmat suit, and some idiot with a tricorder says: "Hey instead of being safe lets all simultaneously remove our protective headgear."
Their working with the aliens, kill them with fire.
Assuming you know enough about biochemistry, and had scanning equipment capable of correctly identifying things at the molecular level, you could at least divide things into 3 groups:
1. Stuff known to be harmful
2. Things which are known to be inert
3. Items which have not been encountered before.
(And you could divide number 3 up into groups based on how closely they resemble something which is known).
Of course, that's all well and good, but it does still leaves several obvious holes:
Firstly, you have to assume that the planet does not contain anything that defies the known laws of physics and chemistry. It's one thing to detect an unknown virus by it's chemical structure. Quite another to detect an object composed of an entirely unknown form of matter that wasn't even known to exist theoretically.
Secondly, you would have to assume there is nothing in the environment that the scanners missed because of some random chance, or because of how they're configured. (For instance, if a scanner functions by performing a 2d sweep across the field of view, you would be in trouble if there was something moving around that just happened to move away just as the scanner passed it.)
Since encountering that defies known science, while not impossible, isn't very likely, that means
the last one is the real killer. Because it means you would have to be able to scan an entire planet in one go, with no room for anything to slip through the cracks because of some quirk of how your scanning equipment functions.
As such, being able to determine with a handheld scanner such as a tricorder that an environment is completely safe is incredibly unlikely.
However, something like a biofilter as you sometimes hear about on Star Trek when they use the transporters is far more plausible. If you have to scan someone down to a sub-molecular level anyway, determining if there is something unfamiliar in their system is probably not that difficult. (The more you know about what they are supposed to be like normally, the easier it'd be to determine if they've picked up anything along the way.)