TheNamlessGuy said:
No, no we are not animals.
We are classified as animals, yes.
But Pterodactyls were also classified as a dinosaur, but they're technically not Dinosaurs, as they are only landwalkers.
We can talk.
They can not.
We are not animals
Your dinosaur example is a rather flawed one. Dinosaur isn't a real biological term, it's not a proper classification. Unlike animal, which is a proper classification. And we as a species have all the biological properties of an animal; we're multicellular, eukaryotic, we lack rigid cell walls, we're motile and digest food in an internal chamber.
That's a rough sketch (some exceptions exist, look them up at your own leisure) of what an animal is. There's nothing more to it, and it's quite obvious that we have those characterises and are thus classified as animals.
On to your language argument, which is also rather flawed. Almost all animals communicate. Some do it with sound, some do it with chemicals or motions, you name it. Groundhogs, birds, dogs, they all talk to each other, it's just that we don't speak their language. You could just say that our language is more complex than most other languages, although some research suggests that whale songs are more complex than our language. Here [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8886--whale-song-reveals-sophisticated-language-skills.html] is a little article about it, you might find it interesting.
Now all this doesn't mean that we don't have characteristics that set us apart from other animals. Heck, that speaks for itself from a biological standpoint. Every species has something that sets it apart as just that, a separate species, humans included. But that doesn't mean that we're not animals.
The animal kingdom is just a very broad group of creatures to whom we obviously belong. It doesn't downplay any of the characteristics that make us special as a species, that's something a lot of people forget.