Poll: What did you like/hate about the new Harry Potter movie?

Recommended Videos

JanatUrlich

New member
Apr 24, 2009
1,963
0
0
I've only read the first 2 Harry Potter books because I hate JK Rowling's writing style, but I believe that the plot is a good one and it's a shame that the books are not written better.

For this reason, I actually enjoy the films because they're easy to watch and the plot is usually pretty interesting!

However I feel that with this one, nothing actually happened. Sure, Dumbledore dies, but as for plot progression it felt more like a filler than an actual film. Like they needed to get some details and shit out of the way before they could move on to the actual plot.

I liked it because Tom Felton looked lovely 8D

I didn't like it because there wasn't enough Jason Isaacs (Lucius Malfoy).

I gave it a 3 =D
 

Spacewolf

New member
May 21, 2008
1,232
0
0
Well im sure the next film which will most likly be about them camping and agnst will be something i will want to miss
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0
Harry Potter book series sucks ass. They're a generic copy of real fantasy boiled down to be suitable for the general audience. People brag about reading them because they're long/ Forgetting that the Harry Potter books are childrens books. Mainly Preteen books actually. They suck hard. I pickd up the first one and thought it was retarted. I read up to 4 because I thought "It must get better to be so popular". It does not. Stop giving this book and its shitty author recognition as a classic. It sucks hard.

The movies are okay though
 

sanomaton

New member
Oct 25, 2008
411
0
0
I shouldn't have opened this thread. D:

I haven't seen the movie because it hasn't been shown here yet... >_>
 

EeveeElectro

Cats.
Aug 3, 2008
7,055
0
0
Yeah, Dumbledore's funeral... It may be in the next movie, I'm not sure.
They didn't say much about the Half Blood Prince, which was what the movie was supposed to be about. It was more...
Harry finds a book. It helps him in lesson. Hermione's like, 'lol wtf are you gonna find out? no? kk.'
Near the end, Snape is like, 'I'm the half blood prince, lol.'

The movies don't really stick to the books though, they never have.
Although you could argue, the movies are only based on the books.
 

aruseusx

New member
Apr 22, 2009
864
0
0
All the non adult characters seemed stoned (Luna doesn't count as it was her characterisation) besides Harry and Hermione.
 

Eruanno

Captain Hammer
Aug 14, 2008
587
0
0
They cut out Luna Lovegoods commentary of the Quidditch match! Argh!

Also, wasn't there a MUCH longer battle in Hogwarts in the finale in the book? Here they just strolled in, threw up that nasty-looking skull-in-the-sky, killed Ol' Dumbie, set fire to Hagrids house and went their way all bobbing their heads and patting their backs over the great work they did.

Not to mention the part where Dumbledore shows Harry the memories of Voldemorts family. Hmm.

And still I liked it.
 

Captain Spiral

New member
Apr 22, 2009
134
0
0
Gilbert Munch said:
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned or not, but... the film is called 'Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince'. So, where was the Half Blood Prince? I think there were three times it came up, honestly - when he found the book, when he used the spell, and when Snape revealed it was him. In the book there is so much more to it, about how Snape was only half wizard. It was this that was seriously lacking from the film.
Yea it kinda seemed like they had forgotten about that plotline and just threw Snapes line in there at the last second once they remembered.

Also...

No funeral
No fight
No Luna Commentary
No Lupin/Tonks stuff
and some other stuff...

Its not that it was a bad movie but I feel as if they shouldve focused on different things than what they... well....focused on.
 

Jibblejab

New member
Apr 14, 2009
216
0
0
In the book it actually explains the half blood prince more...

Whilst in the film harry uses a spell on
snape who turns around and says "lolz, that iz ma spellz, u cant use ma spelllz on meh!"
harry is like "u iz teh half blud prince"
and snape is like "yeh innit"
and harry is like "o rly?"
and snape is like "ya rly"

then they both dance for a bit and arrange to have lunch together
 

DND Judgement

New member
Sep 30, 2008
544
0
0
THEY TOOK THE GOD DAMN BATTLE OUT OF THE END... i mean come on why would you do that...

also you could tell Michael Gambon and Alan Rickman just didn't give a damn about this film...

also the lack of parts to ogle emma watson...
 
Mar 17, 2009
4,094
0
0
Haven't seen it yet, don't know if I will. I went to a book store and opened up at the last page of the last book because I couldn't be bothered reading them anymore.

Safe to say, my infatuation with HP has faded.
 

October Country

New member
Dec 21, 2008
215
0
0
I thought the movie was pretty good, despite cutting some important parts of the book. The final fight in the end and the explanations of both the Half Blood Prince and Voldemorts back story. Some of that could easily have been included in stead of the endless flirting scenes between Harry/Ginny and Ron/Hermione. I still give it 4/5 though - it's been a while since I read the book so the changes didn't bother me as much as they have previously.
 

resultsmayvary

New member
Apr 30, 2009
205
0
0
MaxTheReaper said:
JanatUrlich said:
I liked it because Tom Felton looked lovely 8D
He seriously did.
He also has a very excellent fashion sense.

ExplosionProofTaco said:
Pros: Wizard Fights, Emma Watson.
Cons: Daniel Radcliffe (I just hate that Fag ...For some reason)
Thaaaat's right.
Calling people "fags" is an excellent way to express your distaste for them.
When you're 12.

I kind've wish they hadn't cut so much stuff out, but meh.
It was fun. Popcorn movie, I think they call it?
Flick I believe, popcorn flick. I'm not a fan of calling a movie a flick though.

Anyway, I basically thought that they took the sub-plot of the book-the teen romance-and made it the main focus of the movie. While the main focus of the book-Harry's lessons with Dumbledore- and took it out all together.

In the end I still enjoyed it.
 

Plinglebob

Team Stupid-Face
Nov 11, 2008
1,815
0
0
Half Blood Prince if definitely one of my favourite books in the seriesand so I wasn't looking foward to this film as the entire book is mainly filling in backstory ready for the 7th which means lots of talking. While this may work fine in a book, I knew it wouldn't translate well to the screen. I give this film 3 stars mainly due to the fact I ended up liking things I thought I'd hate and hating things I thought I'd like.

Good Points:
Emma Watson and Dan Radcliffe. They've managed to grow into decent actors and their scenes together (especially in the classroom after Ron gets a girlfriend) were always strong.
Jim Broadbent. When I first read the book, he was the actor I had in mind for Slughorn. While he may not fit the physical description from the book, he fitted the character and its hard to imagine anyone else doing the role.
Tom Felton. An actor who originally seemed to have been hired based on his matching a description and ability to sneer has proven himself to be a decent enough actor.
The school and romance sections. I was dreading these areas of the film, but I ended up liking them a lot as they felt believable and were entertaining. My three favourites were Ron and Harry laughing at the kids getting lost, them fighting over the potions book in the cupboard and the Harry/Ginny/Ron scene in the Burrow's living room.

Bad Points.
Michael Gambon. I've never really liked his take on Dumbledore and it felt a lot like he was just phoning it it.
Ginny Weasley (can't remember the actresses name). While hiring someone based on how they fit a description worked for Malfoy, sadly they didn't get lucky twice.
Ron Weasley. This is more the fault of J.K. Rowling and the script writers. While Rupert Grint has managed to fill the role well, Ron as a character has always felt like a bit of a hanger on with his main purpose seeming to be comic relief and getting into trouble.
The Deatheaters. They turn up, go boo, destroy something, then leave. Obvious part being the attack on the Burrow. Never known the bad guys to be so boring.
The Opening. One of the things I liked about the 6th book is Harry doesn't turn up until the 3rd chapter and it would have been nice if the directer had had the balls to do the same here.
The Ending. There are rumours they filmed a battle sequence in Hogwarts, but cut it out and if so its a real pity. Dumbledores death felt very anti-climactic, but I can't quite put my finger on why.
The memories. The best bits in the book cut down to 2 scenes with no explaination of what it all means and therefore making the scenes completely pointless. Not sure how they are going to rescue it in the final films.

Wow, that went on a bit.