Poll: What do you consider the nerdiest?

Recommended Videos

LilithSlave

New member
Sep 1, 2011
2,462
0
0
American football is definitely the nerdiest thing out there.

Once they go off on the subject, there's no shutting them up.

Woah, footballnerdbro, back up, I don't need your tailgate crumbs all over my shirt.

:p
 

Sean Hollyman

New member
Jun 24, 2011
5,175
0
0
Vault101 said:
Ummmm....I really dont know

I guess stuff that requires more intelligance and an apreciation for things that most people would find mundane
This, though it depends on the subject.. really, I mean knowing a lot about movies, for instance isn't really nerdy per say
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Casual Shinji said:
Collecting action figures and other game/movie/comic paraphernalia, and wearing game/movie/comic related clothing.

If you're over the age of 18 and you're still doing this, I consider that really nerdy.
:(

well..I mean.....

I didnt have any money at 18 to do thease things........unlike now
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
Vault101 said:
Casual Shinji said:
Collecting action figures and other game/movie/comic paraphernalia, and wearing game/movie/comic related clothing.

If you're over the age of 18 and you're still doing this, I consider that really nerdy.
:(

well..I mean.....

I didnt have any money at 18 to do thease things........unlike now
Hey, I never said it was bad or stupid, just nerdy... as hell.
 

The Abhorrent

New member
May 7, 2011
321
0
0
Seeing as I view "nerdy" subjects is obscure technical knowledge, while "geeky" subjects are those more closely related to entertainment; the former can be useful, the latter is almost entirely just for fun. As such, that narrows down the qualifiers to mathematics and computer sciences.

And to answer that little predicament, the answer is surprisingly simple -- mathematics.

Pure mathematics is also referred to as "formal logic", and beyond the lowest levels doesn't involve any numbers at all. Mathematical proofs can be astoundingly complex, and can involve a large amount of lateral thinking; Fermat's Last Theorem [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat%27s_last_theorem] more or less speaks for itself. It also has a very close relationship to physics, and at the highest levels the difference between the two is all but non-existent.

Computer sciences on the other hand? While it certainly can be quite complex, it's also very limiting; it's mostly about problem-solving (I think), getting the computer to do what you want it to than figuring out how to do something new. Very useful for doing repetitive computations quickly, but for the most part it's just doing the pure mathematics faster (and usually with less accuracy; definitely "good enough" for the vast majority of people, but pure math only accepts exact accuracy).

---

And for one of the greatest expressions of nerdiness ever conceived.... The Prisoner of Benda Theorem [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prisoner_of_Benda]