I voted "Games which show Women as anything less than totally superior goddesses," but mainly as a joke because there were a couple other options I wanted to choose, but could only choose one.
Essentially if its not a game for pervs, Superman and Lois Lane can look perfect but every other person should be normal (and varied please, some games everyone looks the same)RelexCryo said:That's a good point. On average, men get more eye candy than women, which is unfair. It is pretty much every woman in many stories, despite a large amount of unattractive men. But is giving both genders plenty of eye candy inherently unfair? What if the amount of male/female eye candy was totally equal?Grype said:Yeh, I agree they shouldn't get pissed off about it but (sexism warning) women get more worked up about things than men, imo.RelexCryo said:And therein lies the question: If we men are fine with girls getting their own eye candy, is it really sexism? Since we are fine with women getting equal treatment under that system.Grype said:Not all women are beautiful (shocker) and games where women are always portrayed as perfection would surely irritate the majority. This would only apply for men if we gave a shit.
Also where curvy teens are begging the male char for sex, that gets on my nerves, why doesn't that happen to me?
Apart from which, isn't elitism an almost inherent nature of heroes/heroines? Aren't they usually people we wish we could be?
As for heroes being perfect, yeh again youre right but its not only the heroines who are drop dead gorgeous (if a little cgi) its any female character other than the wicked witch who is so topheavy they should hardly be able to stand, obvious exception is the sims where everyone is fugly.
Damnjoystickjunki3 said:I voted "Games which show Women as anything less than totally superior goddesses," but mainly as a joke because there were a couple other options I wanted to choose, but could only choose one.
And I take those people (because they're not always women) and laugh at them. I'm not opposed to equality, but I'm definitely not for superiority. Women and men are not the same, we each have strengths and weaknesses that are complimented by the opposite sex. And I'm not saying a woman can't be better than a man (or vice-versa), I'm saying that the genders, when looked at in their entirety, each have something the other doesn't.RelexCryo said:Damnjoystickjunki3 said:I voted "Games which show Women as anything less than totally superior goddesses," but mainly as a joke because there were a couple other options I wanted to choose, but could only choose one.now the scientific integrity of my poll is messed up. i really wanted to know waht people thought. Some women think traditional society, (where women stay at home and be housewives) is inherently offensive to women and must be destroyed. Some women honestly think women should be in charge, and shown as being naturally better at leading than men. A combination of karma and statement of what they believe as fact.(The belief that women make better leaders)
Just to be clear, I am not mocking the struggle the women's rights, I do believe women are equals and should be treated as such. I am jsut saying different women have different ideas about how society should be. Some even believe that portraying women as anything less than being meant to rule IS an offense to women.
And I think that is a very accurate viewpointjoystickjunki3 said:And I take those people (because they're not always women) and laugh at them. I'm not opposed to equality, but I'm definitely not for superiority. Women and men are not the same, we each have strengths and weaknesses that are complimented by the opposite sex. And I'm not saying a woman can't be better than a man (or vice-versa), I'm saying that the genders, when looked at in their entirety, each have something the other doesn't.RelexCryo said:Damnjoystickjunki3 said:I voted "Games which show Women as anything less than totally superior goddesses," but mainly as a joke because there were a couple other options I wanted to choose, but could only choose one.now the scientific integrity of my poll is messed up. i really wanted to know waht people thought. Some women think traditional society, (where women stay at home and be housewives) is inherently offensive to women and must be destroyed. Some women honestly think women should be in charge, and shown as being naturally better at leading than men. A combination of karma and statement of what they believe as fact.(The belief that women make better leaders)
Just to be clear, I am not mocking the struggle the women's rights, I do believe women are equals and should be treated as such. I am jsut saying different women have different ideas about how society should be. Some even believe that portraying women as anything less than being meant to rule IS an offense to women.
Sorry for messing up your poll, but it was bound to happen at some point. Don't forget: you're one the internet.
SorryJanatUrlich said:too many threads on why things are offensive to women is offensive to me.
duke nukem?StarStruckStrumpets said:*Facepalm*
This thread isn't going to end well...
In my opinion, I don't like games where women are just treated as sexual objects instead of people, but then again, most games that are like that cater to men anyway.
Sounds reasonable. But to some people, it's not about immersion, it's about the inherent immorality of rape or giving all the women giant boobs. Not saying I think your perspective is wrong though.Roflpotamus said:Depends on the context of the game. If its trying to be realistic, then I'd say there are limits to what you can do, especially concerning beauty. Having men that mistreat women in a game trying to be realistic isn't offensive, or shouldn't be - it happens in real life, regardless of how wrong it is. Its merely showing the setting of that game.
Even to a degree, if it was in the right context, rape should be tolerable. We kill people in games, so why is that something that is so offensive?
If it is unrealistic and out of context, then it can be considered offensive. To be honest, it just loses the sense of immersion for me when that happens, I don't really get annoyed over it.
Technically, yes, it'd be sexist and wrong, but to be honest, I wouldn't actually feel really offended by it. Since sexism towards men is rare, I suppose I'd consider that game to be a one-time thing, which is different to sexism towards women: they have to put up with it in at least 50% of all games, accross several genres, so obviously every new iteration of the "Women are weak, beautiful and promiscuous" clichè will be met with anger, and understandably so.RelexCryo said:Would you say that a Dominatrix "harem" game in which all men are cute studs who are submissive to women is inherently sexist towards men and wrong?Clashero said:I voted for women being shown as beautiful and submissive. That's where I say the line is drawn, and the point in which I consider the game sexist.
Traditional social structure isn't wrong. Could you possibly imagine a Victorian era game (if such a thing exists) in which women are more powerful than men? It would kill the historical accuracy.
What if Oscar Wilde had envisioned women to be exactly equal to men? Lady Windermere's Fan would have been pretty dull, then.
I think a perfect example of a game that is NOT sexist is the new Prince of Persia. Both characters, being of different genders and different races (and I'm saying races in the fantasy sense of the word), have different skills and abilities. The prince can use his agility and strength to perform great acrobatics and fight. What Elika lacks in strength she makes up for it in her magic. While the Prince wallruns using his gauntlet and body, Elika uses magic to attach herself to the wall.
Also, whenever the Prince fails, Elika saves him from death. She rejects his lecherous comments, sometimes so wittily that she shuts the Prince up for good. She's driven, determined, pretty while not having epic boobs, is definitely smarter and more well-read than the Prince, and is also very indepedent (to the point where shetotally legs it at the end of the Epilogue