Depression is an interesting thing.
Our brains consist of a smoothie consisting of two things: a mass of interacting neurons, and a cocktail of chemicals- signals, hormones, blood, etc.- that work together in a way we have not quite understood yet. As such, the diagnosis of neuralogical disorders is difficult. While we can measure and detect levels of activity or chemical concentration, we have no way of understanding what that implies on a larger level. We can try to link or correlate different measurements to conditions, but the reasons tend to be far more complicated than that- is it to do with a chemical imbalance or a scarring memory? Is it insensitivity to endorphins or some learned emotional dullness?
The problem is that, unlike other diseases or disorders, you cannot have a test for anything neurological- it has to do with inferring or interpreting a set of reactions, except it isn't even THAT simple! What if the interpretation of an image as frightening has not to do with having fear but a genuine interest in fear?
My point is that depression, although I believe it exists, cannot be identified properly, so applying it as a clinical condition is a loose term. Depression can be caused by many things, and can express itself in just as many, so we do not know.
Depression is a loose term for many disorders.
Our brains consist of a smoothie consisting of two things: a mass of interacting neurons, and a cocktail of chemicals- signals, hormones, blood, etc.- that work together in a way we have not quite understood yet. As such, the diagnosis of neuralogical disorders is difficult. While we can measure and detect levels of activity or chemical concentration, we have no way of understanding what that implies on a larger level. We can try to link or correlate different measurements to conditions, but the reasons tend to be far more complicated than that- is it to do with a chemical imbalance or a scarring memory? Is it insensitivity to endorphins or some learned emotional dullness?
The problem is that, unlike other diseases or disorders, you cannot have a test for anything neurological- it has to do with inferring or interpreting a set of reactions, except it isn't even THAT simple! What if the interpretation of an image as frightening has not to do with having fear but a genuine interest in fear?
My point is that depression, although I believe it exists, cannot be identified properly, so applying it as a clinical condition is a loose term. Depression can be caused by many things, and can express itself in just as many, so we do not know.
Depression is a loose term for many disorders.