Fork - left ; Knife - right. But that's only if I am using them both at the same time. If I am just using the fork, then I tend to do it with my right hand.
Things are similar here, i start off with the fork in the right hand, knife in the left, swap when i need to cut things, swap again to eat it.tzimize said:I change mid-meal.
Edit: Not to be difficult, but I really do. I carve my food, then switch around.
.Daystar Clarion said:Are the forks designed with a cutting edge?shadyh8er said:Or how about the Trinidadian way where you do all of your cutting with the side of the fork?Daystar Clarion said:Much more efficient than the ridiculous American method anyway, which is to cut the food (knife in right hand), then set the knife down, to then switch the fork to the right hand.
OT: Being right-handed, I want the knife in my right hand because I handle a knives too awkwardly with my left. Not to mention I want all the force I can get when I'm cutting.
Because I can imagine that being very awkward to do, especially to a steak.
...Daystar Clarion said:Actually, it is correct manners to eat with the fork in the left hand and knife in the right hand.
It's called continental style etiquette.
Much more efficient than the ridiculous American method anyway, which is to cut the food (knife in right hand), then set the knife down, to then switch the fork to the right hand.
Thing is, I'm using my fork to balance the knife on, and have full control over it. You still have to use the fork to hold the thing you're cutting in place, so why not use it for balance at the same time and be more efficient?Goody said:There is a reason for knife in right hand, if you are right handed because if you need to use a sharp knife, you use your strong hand in order to have better control over it, making it safer for you and anyone around you in that situation. I believe that is some rather good logic.GeorgW said:I made a thread somewhat similar to this a long, long time ago.
The correct way is fork left, knife right. That has always been my belief, and apparently that's not as widely spread as I thought, at least given the feedback I got in the last thread.
However, I do eat using fork right, knife left. I've always done so and I think that, as I'm right handed, it's the logical way to do it. Screw etiquette, I don't want my useless left hand shoving sharp items into my mouth. I've always believed that there is no good reason for the way you're supposed to hold utensils, it's simply grown out of old customs, and I protest it.
However your logic for fork in the right hand actually makes sanse too, if sticking pointy things in your mouth, have better control over it, now both ways have some logic to them. Although I voted knife right anyway
I don't know about you, but I don't exactly need a dominant hand to get the food from the plate to my mouth, it's not the Krypton Factor.gmaverick019 said:...Daystar Clarion said:Actually, it is correct manners to eat with the fork in the left hand and knife in the right hand.
It's called continental style etiquette.
Much more efficient than the ridiculous American method anyway, which is to cut the food (knife in right hand), then set the knife down, to then switch the fork to the right hand.
how is that ridiculous?
i am eating just as fast if not faster than you by using my proficient hand the most, you have to use both hands to cut the food anyways (usually, at least with meat) so i don't lose any time or anything by switching my fork to my right after i'm done cutting my food? i don't see how that makes me below you/improper manners for doing such..
neither do, i don't NEED to, it's just more convenient for myself, especially considering i usually eat in my room instead of the kitchen and am playing a game or such with my other hand or controlling netflix with it.Daystar Clarion said:I don't know about you, but I don't exactly need a dominant hand to get the food from the plate to my mouth, it's not the Krypton Factor.gmaverick019 said:...Daystar Clarion said:Actually, it is correct manners to eat with the fork in the left hand and knife in the right hand.
It's called continental style etiquette.
Much more efficient than the ridiculous American method anyway, which is to cut the food (knife in right hand), then set the knife down, to then switch the fork to the right hand.
how is that ridiculous?
i am eating just as fast if not faster than you by using my proficient hand the most, you have to use both hands to cut the food anyways (usually, at least with meat) so i don't lose any time or anything by switching my fork to my right after i'm done cutting my food? i don't see how that makes me below you/improper manners for doing such..
You also use the knife while eating to push things like peas or beans onto your fork, as well as sauce manipulation.
So yes. It is more efficient.
Read my original post again.gmaverick019 said:neither do, i don't NEED to, it's just more convenient for myself, especially considering i usually eat in my room instead of the kitchen and am playing a game or such with my other hand or controlling netflix with it.Daystar Clarion said:I don't know about you, but I don't exactly need a dominant hand to get the food from the plate to my mouth, it's not the Krypton Factor.gmaverick019 said:...Daystar Clarion said:Actually, it is correct manners to eat with the fork in the left hand and knife in the right hand.
It's called continental style etiquette.
Much more efficient than the ridiculous American method anyway, which is to cut the food (knife in right hand), then set the knife down, to then switch the fork to the right hand.
how is that ridiculous?
i am eating just as fast if not faster than you by using my proficient hand the most, you have to use both hands to cut the food anyways (usually, at least with meat) so i don't lose any time or anything by switching my fork to my right after i'm done cutting my food? i don't see how that makes me below you/improper manners for doing such..
You also use the knife while eating to push things like peas or beans onto your fork, as well as sauce manipulation.
So yes. It is more efficient.
peas and beans? i don't eat those, so that isn't a problem for me, and i don't "push" them onto a fork, if i really needed to use a fork desperately for something like that or that size, i'll just stab it with the fork.
but like i said, i don't see how that makes my mannerism's below you, that was my main point, i don't get the point of looking down on how someone eats something.(within the means of them using their hands, if they use their feet to eat or something then that's a bit odd.)
i did, and you called it ridiculous as apparently you couldn't fathom why someone would do as such, and you said it was much more efficient, which isn't necessarily true, especially depending on what you are doing (like what i do when i eat), and then i refuted in my post and asked you why it was ridiculous.Daystar Clarion said:Read my original post again.gmaverick019 said:neither do, i don't NEED to, it's just more convenient for myself, especially considering i usually eat in my room instead of the kitchen and am playing a game or such with my other hand or controlling netflix with it.Daystar Clarion said:I don't know about you, but I don't exactly need a dominant hand to get the food from the plate to my mouth, it's not the Krypton Factor.gmaverick019 said:...Daystar Clarion said:Actually, it is correct manners to eat with the fork in the left hand and knife in the right hand.
It's called continental style etiquette.
Much more efficient than the ridiculous American method anyway, which is to cut the food (knife in right hand), then set the knife down, to then switch the fork to the right hand.
how is that ridiculous?
i am eating just as fast if not faster than you by using my proficient hand the most, you have to use both hands to cut the food anyways (usually, at least with meat) so i don't lose any time or anything by switching my fork to my right after i'm done cutting my food? i don't see how that makes me below you/improper manners for doing such..
You also use the knife while eating to push things like peas or beans onto your fork, as well as sauce manipulation.
So yes. It is more efficient.
peas and beans? i don't eat those, so that isn't a problem for me, and i don't "push" them onto a fork, if i really needed to use a fork desperately for something like that or that size, i'll just stab it with the fork.
but like i said, i don't see how that makes my mannerism's below you, that was my main point, i don't get the point of looking down on how someone eats something.(within the means of them using their hands, if they use their feet to eat or something then that's a bit odd.)
At what point did I state that it was 'below' continental etiquette?
Inefficient, yes, but not 'below'.
My persecution complex senses are tingling...
I apologise if my original post came across as condescending. It was certainly not my intention.gmaverick019 said:i did, and you called it ridiculous as apparently you couldn't fathom why someone would do as such, and you said it was much more efficient, which isn't necessarily true, especially depending on what you are doing (like what i do when i eat), and then i refuted in my post and asked you why it was ridiculous.Daystar Clarion said:Read my original post again.gmaverick019 said:neither do, i don't NEED to, it's just more convenient for myself, especially considering i usually eat in my room instead of the kitchen and am playing a game or such with my other hand or controlling netflix with it.Daystar Clarion said:I don't know about you, but I don't exactly need a dominant hand to get the food from the plate to my mouth, it's not the Krypton Factor.gmaverick019 said:...Daystar Clarion said:Actually, it is correct manners to eat with the fork in the left hand and knife in the right hand.
It's called continental style etiquette.
Much more efficient than the ridiculous American method anyway, which is to cut the food (knife in right hand), then set the knife down, to then switch the fork to the right hand.
how is that ridiculous?
i am eating just as fast if not faster than you by using my proficient hand the most, you have to use both hands to cut the food anyways (usually, at least with meat) so i don't lose any time or anything by switching my fork to my right after i'm done cutting my food? i don't see how that makes me below you/improper manners for doing such..
You also use the knife while eating to push things like peas or beans onto your fork, as well as sauce manipulation.
So yes. It is more efficient.
peas and beans? i don't eat those, so that isn't a problem for me, and i don't "push" them onto a fork, if i really needed to use a fork desperately for something like that or that size, i'll just stab it with the fork.
but like i said, i don't see how that makes my mannerism's below you, that was my main point, i don't get the point of looking down on how someone eats something.(within the means of them using their hands, if they use their feet to eat or something then that's a bit odd.)
At what point did I state that it was 'below' continental etiquette?
Inefficient, yes, but not 'below'.
My persecution complex senses are tingling...
you might not have said "below", but when you act condescending on the matter it's still the same, i can act like asshat all day long, but did i ever say i was an asshat? most certainly not, that doesn't change the fact that that is the way someone is intending.
still, sitting here seeing who can be a more proper smartass is stupid and pointless, i was just asking why it was ridiculous and i didn't get quite a clear answer but whatever, i guess i will go back to being american while i enjoy my netflix and GBA game while i'm eating my potatoes and corn.