I see your point and argument quite well -- and here is where I play devil's advocate: divinity and law controls what civilization is -- how it developed and how it continues to exist. Give someone incentive and they will have motivation to achieve the means to the end, right? Similar to the PD -- a simple theory which originated from antiquity (Look at B.K. Dadachanji's The Origin of Law and Legislation) is applied to any social construct, granted it is a flexible enough theory.MiserableOldGit said:'course it matters! Hate and love , much like good and evil, or cooperation and defection are expresions of a broader issue - how should we conduct ourselves as creatures with higher mind functions? We are in a unique position as a species in that we can read the rules of the game rather than just play it- we can't afford to let an advantage like that pass us by- how else can we keep civilisation ticking over? I for one don't want to go back to being a bunch of hairy arsed barbarians.
Although it's called prisoners dilemma, this is just an example to highlight the mechanic of what is essentialy a game theory exercise-it can be applied to many different things, from animals grooming each other to nuclear war strategy. If anyones interested this site gives a better breakdown of its applications...
http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=57706
agreed and true... but this is about love and hate, emotions that are not expressed towards a "a wider group of people", they are usually inspired by a single individual in an extreme way... so again i say, awesome reference but not really applicable in this highly simplistic discussionMiserableOldGit said:Ah, but if you apply prisoners dilemma to a wider group of people an interesting paradox occurs- if you live with people that mostly defect, everyones screwing each other over and everyone gets fined. If however, most people are cooperating, it becomes more and more tempting to defect. Once someone does, however, the trend continues and you find yourself back at the point where evryones defecting. This means the only way to build a society where you can relax, enjoy yourself and build something up is by everyone cooperating and sticking to it.Daemon888 said:No offense but the Prisoner's Dilemma is all about self preservation, in some ways unintentional altruism and how it can be motivated by some circumstances. Love and hate are emotions primarily directed at another, often with complete disregard for self. If the prisoner's hated eachother or loved eachother then their choices would be easy but it is their very indifference towards the other that makes the situation interesting. Doesn't really apply here at all IMO.MiserableOldGit said:Love -its been mathematically proven by the prisoner's dilemma. Debate over. Cheers, science...
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma/
Anyways, GO HATE! Still kicking ass though love did mount an unexpected second wind. Peace.
i love it, and again... agreedDeadarm said:Niether of them are strong because they are both mental weaknesses.
Wow...Ooohhkay? I'm just gonna let things stand at that...MaxTheReaper said:I know a Revan...but no Raven.
I'm sure.
Everything is best this way, I assure you.
Life has the perfect clarity that only comes from being emotionally dead.