Fair enough and I agree. But I'll leave my original post alone cause it gets my point across well enough. Plus then your quote wouldn't make sense anymore.mps4li3n said:Enrathi said:As written the question is ambiguous and yes, in this case math is subjective. The rules of math are not, but the writing and interpretation of the formula are.
Actually i'd put it more like "math is not subjective, but how you write it is because writing employs arbitrary rules (which doesn't mean they're random)".
Just look at all the people that where talking about the left to right rule... 48*(1/2)*12 can be done 24*12 or 48*6... actual math rules cannot be broken like that.
The bracket is there to make it clear 1/2 is 0.5....Amphoteric said:What are you multiplying by the bracket?
Except that the only reason you assume the 2(9+3) is not the subscript is because you're used to representing it like that as that's the way a computer does it... but the slash isn't even the right symbol for division if you ignore that it's used like that by enough people to make it right because the lack of the actual one on keyboards.snowfi6916 said:Tell that to a math teacher...the answer is 288. The parentheses are not done first because the 2 is not in them. Therefore, you MUST do 48/2 first because you do multiplication and division first from left to right then add/subtract.Beryl77 said:Both answers are correct, it depends on how you look at it.
Implied multiplication is still multiplication and does not gain higher precedence.matt87_50 said:the lack of a multiplication sign gives the multiplication higher precedence over the divide operator. this is the ONLY reason the multiplication has higher precedence over divide... none of this PEMDAS BS! divide and multiply have the same priority, its just left to right, except in the case where the multiplication is done here, with at least one of the operands starting with a non digit ( parenthesis or variable) and no multiplication sign between them.
Except you put pointless extra brackets around the whole thing.dsmops2003 said:The correct answer to 48/2(9+3) is 288.
To satisfy the answer of 2 the formula would be (48/(2(9+3)))
I just won a math.
Except that not really a math rule, but a symbol spelling one... one which isn't as universally recognized as everyone seems to think.Atmos Duality said:As written, you cannot arbitrarily put 2(9+3) into the denominator. Why? Order of operations (resolve left to right). Parentheses matter.
Additional parentheses are needed to place 2(9+3) into the denominator as written (horizontal formats are ambiguous). Every algebra book will tell you that. Every math instructor will tell you that.mps4li3n said:Except that not really a math rule, but a symbol spelling one... one which isn't as universally recognized as everyone seems to think.Atmos Duality said:As written, you cannot arbitrarily put 2(9+3) into the denominator. Why? Order of operations (resolve left to right). Parentheses matter.
Like I said it depends on you write it, you could also write it like this:snowfi6916 said:Tell that to a math teacher...the answer is 288. The parentheses are not done first because the 2 is not in them. Therefore, you MUST do 48/2 first because you do multiplication and division first from left to right then add/subtract.Beryl77 said:Both answers are correct, it depends on how you look at it.
That is how it is always written. Whenever you see a division symbol, it means that it is a fraction. This should have been one of the first things you learned in algebra (if not algebra 2).Beryl77 said:Like I said it depends on you write it, you could also write it like this:snowfi6916 said:Tell that to a math teacher...the answer is 288. The parentheses are not done first because the 2 is not in them. Therefore, you MUST do 48/2 first because you do multiplication and division first from left to right then add/subtract.Beryl77 said:Both answers are correct, it depends on how you look at it.
48
---
2(9+3)
Then the answer would be 2.