Laurie Barnes said:
Zaik said:
I'm really on the fence here. From my point of view, both sides seem wrong.
I would typically be 100% behind anyone willing to try to take down the teachers union in any capacity, they certainly do deserve it. However, paying teachers even less isn't really the right way to go about it.
I'm sure there's much better places the money could be taken from, but on the other hand the teachers union has turned the entire education system here into a pathetic joke up until college. I really can't say who I like less.
Actually more than likely the group responsible for that is the US Government. The unions have little control over the system by which they are forced to educate. The real thing to blame for the system being a joke is "No-Child-Left-Behind", which blames teachers for when students get low scores. More often than not the kids get bad scores due to poverty, social instability, racial barriers, and sheer laziness.
'
I won't even pretend that no child left behind was a good idea. It does somewhat address my entire point, but it does it all the wrong way. Also the teacher's union running the education system is at the least indirectly related to it coming about.
I guess the easiest way to explain it is to tell the story of the biggest issue I had with it.
I'm sure most people know that the US government does set guidelines for what students are to be taught. They don't restrict teaching additional stuff(to my knowledge, at least). So, the guidelines are more or less intended to be the bare minimum that a teacher is required to teach.
In high school, we had to take two foreign language classes, which consisted of Spanish or....probably just Spanish. So I was taking the first class and we'd had a newer teacher. She was actually an English major, but she was from Panama so she obviously knew the language well enough to be teaching it. She had a bad habit of going off on rants and stories explaining things that didn't directly relate to the language, but we still learned a lot. At the end of that class(4 months or so) I couldn't speak spanish fluently, but I could have a short conversation or ask relevant questions and mostly understand answers.
So, I wanted to take the second class with her again, but she got fired. Not because she did her job poorly, or tardiness, or theft, or any other reason normal people would get fired for. They said she "Talked too much about her personal life". I didn't personally get it, because it hadn't prevented us from learning anything, but whatever. So I end up with the other teacher, and boy was that depressing. We actually learned more in Spanish 1 than in 2. The teacher never actually taught us anything at all, she just sat at her desk and gave us handouts and told us a few page numbers in a book.
Point of the story is, the teachers union has made it(might be past tense, I was out of high school a number of years before no child left behind was passed) so that teaching wasn't required to be a teacher. As long as you hit the bare minimum the govt. requires, you don't actually have to do anything at all. Instead, holding your job requires just following a strict code of social rules that don't have anything to do with education at all, so that the union can't be marked as supporting any kind of "deviant" behavior and can stay in power.
I won't pretend that the government doesn't screw it up too, however if you're eating a bowl of cereal with spoiled milk, complaining that you don't like the brand of cereal is dumb.