The best kind of sword is a sword cane obviously. It's not the most versatile or effective but there's something awesome about being able to say: "I'm ready for assassination and the semi-formal tonight."
...your name wouldn't happen to be Tall Dave, would it?DragonFae said:I've had training with broadsword, longsword, saber, cavalry sword and rapier, and I gotta say I found the broadsword to be the one I'm most comfortable with. I really like the combo of broadsword and dagger.
Slightly late but anyway, you are aware that no Katana could cut through plate armour, correct?2733 said:you are aware that even the largest of European swords could not cut heavy plate armor, correct? so the katana simply does the same task of cutting a man down with 1/4 the weight.
If it weren't for the risk of injuring yourself, I'd carry those everywhere.kman123 said:Anything super quick to use. I prefer speed over power. Like...dunno, vigoorian flails?
That's the second biggest Kris I've ever seen.blind_dead_mcjones said:the flamberge, sure it looks a bit out of left field but thats part of its appeal
![]()
Agreed, and why would they be? Not like samurai often faced plate armour...flaming_squirrel said:Slightly late but anyway, you are aware that no Katana could cut through plate armour, correct?2733 said:you are aware that even the largest of European swords could not cut heavy plate armor, correct? so the katana simply does the same task of cutting a man down with 1/4 the weight.
(oh hey, I can act condescending too)
Also a Katana is considerably heavier then a longsword and far worse for thrusting through gaps in armour, they essentially clubbed through defences using weight and momentum.
the 1/4 stat comes from that an average (36-38in) katana comes in at about 2lbs while larger flamberge, particularly in the 60-70 inch range (Which were rare I know)could come in at as much as 8lbs, an extreme example true, but I was trying to make a point.Setrus said:Agreed, and why would they be? Not like samurai often faced plate armour...flaming_squirrel said:Slightly late but anyway, you are aware that no Katana could cut through plate armour, correct?2733 said:you are aware that even the largest of European swords could not cut heavy plate armor, correct? so the katana simply does the same task of cutting a man down with 1/4 the weight.
(oh hey, I can act condescending too)
Also a Katana is considerably heavier then a longsword and far worse for thrusting through gaps in armour, they essentially clubbed through defences using weight and momentum.
Also, 1/4 of the weight? Where did THAT figure come from? As flaming squirrel says, the Katana is actually heavier. (not that that makes it slow or actually heavy, just heaviER...weapons aren't made to be weighty, no matter their origin)
You know what's funny about the changes in european swords? How it goes from much slashing and cutting to a very stiff and pointed blade specialised for dealing with armour, then to something in the middle or even completely back since fewer and fewer could afford the more and more expensive plate armour.
Katanas...well they've been like they've been, with very few modifications, for hundreds of years. A cultural thing or one of economy? You decide.![]()