Yes, yes, yes. I was not asking for an explanation, and I'm probably much more familiar with the play than you seem to think I am. I know that a C-section was seen as a strange and unnatural occurrence in Shakespeare's time and I know how that could make someone "not of woman born", and I know that Shakespeare didn't know any better, but that doesn't mean I can't still find it a disappointing twist. After the clever "pound of flesh" twist from The Merchant of Venice, I was just expecting something more elaborate/clever. That's all.OwenEdwards said:Well if the problem is as simple as THAT, then an even simpler answer awaits. No lit crit, no comprehension of plot themes, etc.Citrus Insanity said:I think you may have entirely missed the point of my post.
Who ever suggested that Macduff was magically imbued? The witches made a prophecy that no man of woman born would kill MacBeth, and then the "loophole" in that prophecy was that MacBeth's mother had a C-section, and therefore that somehow made him not "of woman born", thus resolving the prophecy. That's what I thought was a stupid twist: that a C-section makes you not of woman born. I really have no idea what you thought I was talking about.
Just this: back in the day, they didn't have C-Secs, basically. Caesar's kid got out that way, and it was considered that the child had not been born properly; it went against all they thought they knew of medical science. So to have been delivered by C-Sec was not a standard operation, but a way of completely bypassing the normal and correct way to do it. So it is both an impossibility to Macbeth (no man is not "born") and something which makes Macduff lucky and monstrous (he impossible because he has broken the laws of nature).
My original post was a throwaway comment. You really don't need to explain anything to me.