Poll: What would be a reasonable price for games?

Recommended Videos

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
*shrug* Depends from game to game. A pre-set price is just an arbitrary number, so are we talking price or value here?
 

loudestmute

New member
Oct 21, 2008
229
0
0
Let's see... $50 for "AAA titles", $40 for the oddball import category that many Atlus/Xseed games fall under, and $30 for 2+ HD re-releases on one disc.

And no more than $35 for a handheld title.

What really frustrates me is that this is normally the point in a console's lifespan where games start dropping in price in order to further encourage console sales before the next model is announced. More importantly, it's a way to show appreciation to the fans that have been with you from day one to finally lower the entry cost for a new game. But as long as we're still willing to pay current prices (and it looks like we are, for all intents and purposes), then I don't see this practice changing anytime soon.
 

Catfood220

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 21, 2010
2,131
393
88
If it is a game that I am interested in and can't wait to wait to own, then I will buy on release which can be anything between £40-45. Otherwise I can wait, I picked up Bulletstorm for £20 within a couple of months of release and it turned out to be one of my games of last year.

For example, my game buying this year currently stands at Mass Effect 3, Borderlands 2 and The Last of Us if it is released this year. I know more games will come out to tempt me but until I know about them, those 3 are the only ones I will definately buy.
 

burningdragoon

Warrior without Weapons
Jul 27, 2009
1,935
0
0
I think $60 isn't a bad starting price for normal AAA games, though for any game less than 10 hours long that becomes a bit too much. If I feel like the game isn't quite worth full price, I will wait for a price drop.
 

isometry

New member
Mar 17, 2010
708
0
0
I usually stick to buying games that cost less than $20 on steam. Once or twice a year I happily buy a game for $60, like I did with Skyrim and Civilization 5.
 

SoranMBane

New member
May 24, 2009
1,178
0
0
I'd say $40-50 for the average brand new AAA title depending on the amount of content in the game and the amount of resources (money, time, people, etc.) spent in developing it. That said, anything over $30 is generally too much if the game's been out for over a year.

That's just what I'd consider ideal, though. Goods are always going to be priced as high as people are on average willing to pay, and for games that price is apparently $60, which is fair enough even if it's a bit hard for me to swallow.
 

kouriichi

New member
Sep 5, 2010
2,415
0
0
40-60 USD is decently reasonable.

I think it really depends on the game itself. If its a multiplayer game that depends on constant company support ((dedicated servers, patches every week, ect.)) 60$ is completely fine with me.

But if its singleplayer only, with no online play that involves the company ((P2P, splitscreen or Lan gaming)), 40$ is a bit more of a balanced price.
 

omicron1

New member
Mar 26, 2008
1,729
0
0
Skyrim: $60. Possibly $80.
CoD singleplayer: $20.
CoD multiplayer: $30-$40.
Your typical singleplayer-focused 8-10 hour FPS: $30.
STALKER: $50.
Short indie game: $15
Long indie game: $25
MMORPG: $30 (They make enough money off the subscriptions/whales!)
 

Zaverexus

New member
Jul 5, 2010
934
0
0
DeadSp8s said:
Just wait long enough and you can get them on Amazon cheap fairly quickly.
I think that's the way to go. I'll ask for a big long-lasting title for a holiday and play that into the ground and by the time I'm done and looking for a new game all the ones I wanted are cheap at Gamestop or somewhere.
 

michael87cn

New member
Jan 12, 2011
922
0
0
It depends on the game of course. Some are worth more than others. $20-60. Give a vague question get a vague answer. :p

Although, I have always thought that games should not exceed $20. I couldn't see myself paying $60 for a book or a movie or a cd, and I usually don't spend more than $20 on a game. I know I know, not exactly an even comparison, but still. The gaming industry blows millions of dollars on pretty graphics that I don't personally find necessary. I would gladly play a game in 2011 with 2d sprites or FF7 quality polygons if the game was creative, original, interesting and entertaining.

So many games now sacrifice EVERYTHING for graphics. Graphics are the priority and its just so boring. I look out my window and think "nothing will ever look that good in a game, why waste time and money on it? make the game first, and the fluff later".

We are playing games right, not taking scenic virtual tours?
 

Sassafrass

This is a placeholder
Legacy
Aug 24, 2009
51,250
1
3
Country
United Kingdom
Dirty Hipsters said:
I'd say $45.

I mean, if I can get a brand new game as eagerly anticipated as Deus Ex Human Revolution on Steam for $45 on day one, then why the hell does it cost $60 for consoles? In fact, why the hell do console games cost $10 more than PC games at all?
Box, cover art and manual materials probably make up the extra £10 difference.

OT: I'm happy with £35 to £45 either way.
 

EHKOS

Madness to my Methods
Feb 28, 2010
4,815
0
0
$30 for a game that might be meh, and $40 for AAA titles. I'd like to think that's fair.
 

Dirty Hipsters

This is how we praise the sun!
Legacy
Feb 7, 2011
8,802
3,383
118
Country
'Merica
Gender
3 children in a trench coat
Sassafrass said:
Dirty Hipsters said:
I'd say $45.

I mean, if I can get a brand new game as eagerly anticipated as Deus Ex Human Revolution on Steam for $45 on day one, then why the hell does it cost $60 for consoles? In fact, why the hell do console games cost $10 more than PC games at all?
Box, cover art and manual materials probably make up the extra £10 difference.

OT: I'm happy with £35 to £45 either way.
If you buy a PC game, in the box, in a store, it's still $50, not $60, therefore your argument is invalid.
 

Lightning Delight

New member
Apr 21, 2011
351
0
0
Mostly it depends on how long the game takes me to complete. I judge the value (in dollars) of a game based on how long it keeps me entertained. And quality does play a role in this, because I would be willing to give a good game a second and possibly third playthrough, thus extending the amount of time I have been entertained by it.

A single playthrough of Mass Effect 2 took me 30 hours. I would be perfectly fine paying $60 American for that, especially considering I plan to play it again. Call of Duty 12 (or whatever they are now on) would take me about 5 hours to complete, and I do not fancy the multiplayer much. I would not pay much for that game, maybe $10-15 American.

Considering all games are different, though, it's kinda hard to set a universal price for them.

To answer the question, I guess $40-45 American would be a fair price for a game I have never played.
 

DanielBrown

Dangerzone!
Dec 3, 2010
3,838
0
0
New games in Sweden currently cost around 500-600SEK, which translates to about 120$.
I buy my games from the UK though, since they have more reasonable prices. Most often 40£(80$) for new games, with an average of 20£.
 

General Vengeance

New member
Aug 26, 2009
187
0
0
Whatever the market will bear, and it will be set at it's maximum as it always has. If no one buys said product it goes on sale. If unprofitable it is discountinued.
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,900
0
0
Game prices seem fine from where I'm sitting. I remember saving up $40 for Chrono Trigger when it was new, and adjusting for inflation from 1995 to 2010 (according to this [http://www.westegg.com/inflation/], at least)... $40 translates to $56.66. I see no problem.