Brontosaurus is just an incorrect name for Apatosaurus because they thought they were two different creatures.
Still counts as a dinosaur. The name was just wrong.
Brontosaurus is just an incorrect name for Apatosaurus because they thought they were two different creatures.
Still counts as a dinosaur. The name was just wrong.
Archaeopteryx is and will always be the most badass dinosaur. Its the closest thing we've ever had to dragons. It's a goddamn lizard with wings.
But out of those options I'd go with Velociraptors.
Its what the raptors in Jurassic park were modelled off, they changed it to Velociraptor because it sounded cooler. Hollywood can be pretty stupid sometimes.
Just look at that bad boy ain't it just screaming to be saddled up an ridden into the most epic sunset ever
i picked Spinosaurus its a big therapod dinosaur and i also dislike t-rex we had a guy at work called t-rex because he had arms but they were short little arms and he was a massive dick
The Carchardontosaurus may have been smaller than the Spinosaurus, however the Spinosaurus mainly ate fish and sea creatures (Perhaps not ALL, due to the different species, of course). If the creatures were to fight on equal footing (neither with any wounds, same age), then the Carcharodontosaurs may have had a size advantage! Spinosaurs are estimated to be between 41 feet and 59 wheras Carcharodontosaurs sit between 39 and 43 feet. If real Spinosaurs sat at the smaller end of the spectrum, than the idea of a Carcharodontosaur outliving a Spinosaurus isn't very impressive. I understand weight would be a more important factor, however there are huge ranges on the estimated weights for both predators. The Carchardontosaurus was good, but you give the Spinosaurus faaaar too much credit.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
