I'm sure this will have been done before at some point or another but what the hell, I'm curious what everyone else thinks on the price of videogames, I'm putting this question to people from the point of view of consumers
my opinion is that games are a little too expensive, as a consumer I can understand why trends that annoy me exist (for instance, games like Call of Duty and Fifa (just as examples) shattering sales records despite being fundamentally the same as it's predecessor...mind you I'm not really into sports...and all shooters look alike to me, though I did enjoy Resistance 3) the reason sequels sell so well and innovation does not (generally) is because people aren't going to be willing to pay full price for a game they know nothing about
£40/$60 is a lot of money and if you're going to spend it on one thing it's going to be something you're reasonably sure you're going to like so I don't begrudge people who just buy Fifa or Call of Duty or anything like that, it's a lessened investment risk but it does kind of open a door for sequels making maximum profit with minimum effort (sometimes)
my point is that if games were a little cheaper, I think more people would be willing to take chances on games and so new ideas would flourish more, and be less likely to be overshadowed
also if games were cheaper (even just a bit at say £30 or $45 more people would be able to afford brand new games and less people would trade in (in theory)
howeever I am aware of the flipside to this coin
games are insanely expensive to make, so publishers are going to push the price as high as they can get away with, and lowering the price would be quite a risk, because it means that even the popular franchises might make less money, but it also means that games are that little bit more accessible
so what does everyone else think?
my opinion is that games are a little too expensive, as a consumer I can understand why trends that annoy me exist (for instance, games like Call of Duty and Fifa (just as examples) shattering sales records despite being fundamentally the same as it's predecessor...mind you I'm not really into sports...and all shooters look alike to me, though I did enjoy Resistance 3) the reason sequels sell so well and innovation does not (generally) is because people aren't going to be willing to pay full price for a game they know nothing about
£40/$60 is a lot of money and if you're going to spend it on one thing it's going to be something you're reasonably sure you're going to like so I don't begrudge people who just buy Fifa or Call of Duty or anything like that, it's a lessened investment risk but it does kind of open a door for sequels making maximum profit with minimum effort (sometimes)
my point is that if games were a little cheaper, I think more people would be willing to take chances on games and so new ideas would flourish more, and be less likely to be overshadowed
also if games were cheaper (even just a bit at say £30 or $45 more people would be able to afford brand new games and less people would trade in (in theory)
howeever I am aware of the flipside to this coin
games are insanely expensive to make, so publishers are going to push the price as high as they can get away with, and lowering the price would be quite a risk, because it means that even the popular franchises might make less money, but it also means that games are that little bit more accessible
so what does everyone else think?