Poll: Which crime would you rather be falsely accused of?

Recommended Videos

LitleWaffle

New member
Jan 9, 2010
633
0
0
Chose child abuse.

Something I would never do and it is only one life partially hurt. 1000's of jobs are not lost and someone is not dead.

If I have to be accused for something I didn't do I would like it to be the one that is the least... I don't know how to put this. Harmful?

Though child abuse is incredibly dicky. >=(
 

Mymla

New member
Jan 5, 2008
81
0
0
It's not like it really matters, since I'd get aquitted, but murderers and pedophiles are probably more likely to be lynched so I'll go with fraud.
 

Kukakkau

New member
Feb 9, 2008
1,898
0
0
Fraud because out of the ones there you are least likely to be held in jail for the duration of the trial
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
Fraud. I want to get laid, and with doubts that you may have killed your spouse, that kinda limits choices. that... and i dont wnat my current gf to die.

as for child abuse... well... that just never looks good.
 

PrototypeC

New member
Apr 19, 2009
1,075
0
0
Everybody is afraid of a murderer, even other, better murderers. It's the closest to my personality, anyway... if I was going to be wrongfully accused I'd rather it be something that'll make me look dangerous or important rather than a child abuser ("spineless worms" that are guaranteed to get savaged in prison) or have a lame fraud charge (you're not a magnificent bastard if you got caught).

Loki Cain said:
None of these, Arson, nothing sounds more badass than arson.
Actually... that is pretty badass. Depends on the scale of it of course, but you've also got a better chance of not being as harshly judged once you get out of prison. Arson would work too!
 

dragonslayer32

New member
Jan 11, 2010
1,663
0
0
Queen Michael said:
dragonslayer32 said:
Zyst said:
I went for Child Abuse, because it's the thing I'm more likely to do? I suppose? I am in highschool and I'm 18, so I commit underage 'rape' often, screw it.
Erm...What? Are you serious?
I think the guy just means that he has sex with people who like him and are eighteen as well, since you've gotta be older than eighteen where he lives to have sex. That way it's techincally illegal but not the stuff that'll get Batman on your @$$.
At least that's how I interpreted it.
Ah, I see. I took that TOTALLY the wrong way...
 

Kermi

Elite Member
Nov 7, 2007
2,538
0
41
Murder. The fraud charges would cause far more people to be publically vilified and remember me. A child abuse charge would be likely to get me assaulted or killed in prison.

At least if I'm charged with murder, the lowest possible number of people in society are going to remember it, and more likely to remember I was found not guilty.

People tend to forget the not guilty part of a trial a lot more when it comes to child abuse and fraud.
 

Betancore

New member
Apr 23, 2010
1,857
0
0
Fraud or murder. With the latter, I guess I could plead battered-wife syndrome or something. But I'd be proven innocent in the end anyway. I don't really know, both are better than being accused of abusing a child.
 

Jamash

Top Todger
Jun 25, 2008
3,638
0
0
Murder.

A fraud charge, even if you're acquitted, can jeopardise your credit rating and future job prospects (especially any position of trust or involving money).

Being publicly declared a paedophile, even if you're later acquitted, can ruin your life, especially when applying for jobs or positions of of trust with children or vulnerable people.

Murder people can forgive, especially if it's a crime of passion as per the example given (in France it's not even considered to be as bad as proper murder).

Also, in the example given, once you're found to be innocent and someone else is convicted of the murder of your wife, you'd get a lot of sympathy for having lost your loved one, for having been falsely accused and having to endure the ordeal of the trial.

I'm pretty sure you'd be in a good position to seek compensation from the police and courts for actually being prosecuted for murder for 6 months on a handful of flimsy evidence, all the while the real murder went free for 6 months (in reality I doubt they'd even risk trying to prosecute you based on such weak evidence).

Harrison Ford's character in The Fugitive is a tragic hero figure, not a suspicious hate figure.

It's also worth considering when you apply for jobs in the public sector and/or any positions of trust, you have to declare any time you've been arrested, not just convicted, and I think fraud or child abuse would seem worse than murder (since it would be obvious to the employer it was a false arrest).

I once got arrested (and released less than a hour later) for 1 ecstasy tablet, but when I apply for jobs I have to declare I was arrested for "Possession of Class A Drugs" which appears 10 times worse on paper than the reality of the situation, which I'm sure affects my chances of getting a job even though it isn't supposed to.