Poll: Which Current Gen CoD have you enjoyed the Most?

[Paragon Fury]

So we've had 5 Call of Duty games for this current generation. Of all of them, which have you enjoyed the most? And why?

Personally, as fun as CoD4 was, I still think Black Ops is the best and most fun. Less BS than all the other games, a damn interesting campaign (even with that kind of lame twist at the end), and Zombies is sheer fun too.

 

[fire-exit-man]

You're missing the actual poll...

Personally even though I Haven't played BlOps yet I think CoD4 is the best of the bunch. A good campaign backed up by a near flawless engine and, for a game, a pretty good story. I will say that WaW's Zombie mode is probably my favourite Co-Op mode, and I'd rather not play CoD Online Multiplayer these days.

 

[TheRightToArmBears]

WaW, I love the online on that. It's great. Everything feels much more balanced than MW and MW2, and there are tanks.

TANKS!!!

 

[MetallicaRulez0]

Easily CoD4. Other than the M16 and ACOG M40, it's a perfectly balanced game. It also has by far the best maps out of the bunch.

 

[Gardenia]

I didn't play much multiplayer in either of them, so I'm basing this purely on the story.
And the winner is: Cod4, by a mile. Followed by MW2.

 

[WorldCritic]

CoD4, I just thought it was the most enjoyable. WaW was ok, CoD3 was awful (IMO), and I actually did kind of like MW2, but not that much.

 

[monkey_man]

BO. I am actually kinda good at it.
first time for a CoD game

 

[hardpixelrain]

CoD2 and CoD4 are the best still. Maybe not in the field of multiplayer, but as far as the campaign they are the most polished and immersive of the series.

 

[kokirisoldier]

1. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
2. Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2
3. Call of Duty World at War

Well CoD 4 tugged at my heart strings with a few of the levels, such as when you have to rescue the female cobra pilot after she helped out out. Plus I'm a male so it just sort of struck a nerve to help the girl in a bad situation. Plus the ending.

Modern Warfare 2 was a great bit of fun with the difference between the Rangers following orders and TF 141 pretty much making their own. The Idea was fun because it was so crazy and off the walls yet still had great characterization.

World at War was fun because we finally got a Call of Duty game set in the pacific side of WW2. Sure it was fun freezing in France and storming Berlin as a Russian, but we all wondered..."what about the Japanese".

 

[kwagamon]

I haven't *finished* Black Ops yet, but I've gotten about halfway through. It's a close second to World at War for campaign, far surpassing it for multiplayer. Although I'd like to point out that the under-barrel flamethrower was such a letdown. My friend told me about the flamethrower and it sounded awesome so I tried it out, but then it wound up being so bad.

 

[Yagharek]

Easily cod4.

Black ops is decent online, but I think people exagerrate this because of the amount of crap MW2 had. For example, the peope celebrating the nerfed killstreaks. They're still considerably stronger than Cod4s. Nice to see quickscoping gone(since now 80% of people on cod4 seem to do this, sadly), similar with stopping power and juggernaut, but perk balance needs work (particularly, there should be one really good set, to stop half the game using ghost). Zombies is good to.

Cod5's online isn't as good as Black ops', and WW2 setting had been done so much before. The single player is terrible. Treyarch make their games hard by cheap stuff, like infinite spawns, ridiculous grenades etc. Compared to cod4, where the difficult bits are difficult but consistently doable if you're good, rather than just needing persistence and luck for the most part, the single player just doesn't hold up.

MW2 is just straight out of the running. Story is rubbish(though not as cheap as the Treyarch games), online is rubbish, and spec ops isn't as good as zombies.

I like black ops online, and the zombies, however it's single player has more cheapness in the first few levels than cod4(or MW2 for that matter) does in the whole campaign. Which is a shame.

 

[Eclectic Dreck]

That is a tricky call.

I played MW2 more than MW, but I quit MW2 in frustration with the game's problems and the endless stream of losers who choose to play by exploiting glitches and griefing. Call of Duty 5 was a better single player experience than 3 in a very general way but the game mechanics for multiplayer seemed entirely out of place. It was like I was playing a bizarre twisted version of Modern Warfare.

In terms of the single player game, I'd actually rate Call of Duty 3 above 2, largely because I played 3 before I ever touched 2. While, I'm quite sure my opinion would be different had I played them at the proper time and in the proper order, it just seemed that 3 was iteratively better than 2, just not in any jaw dropping or significant way.

In general, I'd say that Modern Warfare probably did the best job. The single player campaign was well crafted from start to finish and the multiplayer was well balanced an entertaining enough to spend a few days with. I stopped playing Modern Warfare largely because I got bored with the game before new maps were delivered and, once they had been, I was busy playing a different game instead. As such, because I found the campaign better than Modern Warfare and the multiplayer did not cause an eventual rage quit from the franchise altogether, I'd say Modern Warfare was my favorite of the lot.

 

[sheogoraththemad]

the ones I played?
1. MW
2. WAW
3. MW2

 

[JourneyThroughHell]

Either Modern Warfare 2 or Black Ops. Modern Warfare 2 defeats Black Ops in the single player and (don't flame me plox) coop department. But it definitely loses in multiplayer.

So... hell, I don't know. Either MW2 or Blops.

 

[8-Bit Grin]

Modern Warfare had a fantastic multiplayer mode, and an interesting singleplayer.

That's my vote.

 

[Xorph]

MW by a long shot. I haven't played Black Ops yet, but have read/seen enough to know its not that good. MW's campaign was far better than WaW (which felt horribly dull to me), and it wasn't filled with a thousand plotholes like MW2 was.
In terms of MP, MW has far more balanced weapons and killstreaks, enough so that I don't mind the streaks being there (in MW2 I only play barebones). I like MW2s maps a bit better, but thats something I can get over. WaW seemed like they just took what MW had, changed the skins and fire rates on a few guns, and said they were done. Zombies was fun, but having to pay a total of $30 to get extra maps was simply something I can't work with.
On a 1-10 scale:
MW: 8.9/10
WaW:4/10
MW2: 7/10

 

[CPUburrito]

CoD4 baby

 

[Madara XIII]

So we've had 5 Call of Duty games for this current generation. Of all of them, which have you enjoyed the most? And why?

Personally, as fun as CoD4 was, I still think Black Ops is the best and most fun. Less BS than all the other games, a damn interesting campaign (even with that kind of lame twist at the end), and Zombies is sheer fun too.

CoD4 was the best in my opinion. Great campaign and no need to do multiplayer. Just how I like my FPSs

Sorry but unless we're talking 3rd person shooter or fighter you ain't getting me to go online

 

[Taxman1]

I'm going to get a backlash for this but MW2. I just keep going back to it, it's like a guilty pleasure. I didn't start on CoD4 or WaW so maybe the problem lies there. Though my Black Ops copy hasn't arrived yet.

 

[Hosker]

Cod 2: varied missions and huge battles makes it easily the best singleplayer Cod, although Black Ops comes somewhat close.
I had the most fun in multiplayer in this as well; by todays standards it would seem boring, but it was the first game I had ever played online and I never got annoyed while playing.