Poll: which fetish is stranger?

Recommended Videos

pln9fos

New member
Mar 17, 2010
85
0
0
Considering that I'm a furry myself and not into sex, I'd say vore.

For the record, just because someone is considered a "furry" does not mean that they desire sex with non-human animals. It just means that you feel that you have a deep spiritual connection with a certain animal. The stereotypical "furries" are what I like to call "extremists," kind of like the tea party; there's nothing you can do about them, but either group will probably give us a total brainfuck one way or another =P
 

PrototypeC

New member
Apr 19, 2009
1,075
0
0
I found out about Vore the hard way. I've discovered that if someone has an extreme fetish (furryism and vore among them) then they're more likely to have a second extreme fetish, or a third, that they mix and match.

It's fascinating in the same way I find Neo-Nazis and Man vs. Food fascinating, that is to say, totally foreign to me so much so that it doesn't seem human.
 

AnkaraTheFallen

May contain a lot of Irn Bru
Apr 11, 2011
6,323
0
0
Sonic Doctor said:
Furry is weird because it will always involve non-humans.
I'd just like to say as I did earlier... Furry covers a wide range of things, admittedly some do involve fantasies about other species, but it can be as simple as they want to have sex with someone who is wearing cat ears for example... they still want to be with a person, but they like the idea of them being part cat for example... sorry if this hasn't made sense though.
 

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,636
0
0
Vore, definitely. Now it might just be because I don't find furries all that strange (who's to say that we need be only attracted to typical human beings?), but vore has always been a bit weird to me. Being eaten or eating something (don't know if it's both) seems like such an odd thing to be aroused by.

I haven't got a problem with either (as long as it's consensual blah, blah, blah...) but I'm with the idea that vore is weirder.
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,042
0
0
Sejs Cube said:
Furry is kinda weird, but vore is far worse.


Congrats on being a horrible person, OP.
I hope that last sentence is joke. These are fantasies. Having such a fantasy doesn't make a person horrible.

I find the furry fetish to be far worse than Vore, but I don't think people that have the furry fetish as horrible. They are just people like you and me.

I think it would be safe to say that everybody has some kind of fetish. I've seen many so called "normal and clean people" that were quite horrible compared to most fetishists.
 

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,636
0
0
Corjha said:
Y'know if you combine furry, vore and necro you get...a completely normal person. Someone who likes to eat dead animal.
AH HA HA HA! The weirdness piles up so much that it becomes normal. Although it would be someone who is sexually aroused by eating dead animals, but I'm sure that's out there.
 

Sejs Cube

New member
Jun 16, 2008
432
0
0
Sonic Doctor said:
I hope that last sentence is joke. These are fantasies. Having such a fantasy doesn't make a person horrible.
Waving the flag of moral relativism is adorable and all, but no, the last sentence wasn't a joke.

Vore makes a fetish of an act that, by its nature, involves the death of one party or the other. Eating and digestion is not a survivable process. Vore is in essence a snuff fetish with some additional bits stapled on. I am entirely comfortable calling that horrible.
 

PatSilverFox

New member
Apr 2, 2011
498
0
0
Well vore is a fetish, furries are a fandom. They have a fetish because they are part of a fandom, they are not primarily a fetish like vore is.
So vore definitely.
 

Elvoret

New member
Mar 3, 2011
86
0
0
Vore I guess.

Though the two often get combined into wierder and wierder subsets until you notice it's 4am and your brain no longer wants to work and your eyes are burning except there's no way to unsee all the things you saw.
 

Robert Drapp

New member
Dec 21, 2010
32
0
0
I must agree with the masses. Dressing up (In any sense) is alittle odd depending on your outfit choice while the whole Vore thing confuses me and I am sure that while I might have given Furry a chance (just for the sake of saying I tried it once), Vore is out.
 

AC Drawings

New member
Dec 22, 2010
34
0
0
Vore is creepy and the very idea of it is frightening the whole "Closeness to one you find attractive" thing makes sense in it's own twisted twisted way, but that doesn't make it any less creepy and uncomfortable.
 

Peteron

New member
Oct 9, 2009
1,378
0
0
How can someone be sexually aroused by being eaten? At least furies are a little bit normal once you take off the ears and tail! I had no idea Vore even existed until now, it disgusts me.
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
Snake Plissken said:
Having sex with people in bunny costumes in the privacy of your own home won't get anyone arrested.

Someone being eaten in any sexual endeavor will.

You, strange sir, are a deviant.
Oh we all know how weird furry is but there's no way it can get weirder than that...

*Looks up Vore on google*

...HOLY JESUS MOTHERF*%KING CHRIST!!!!! People get off to that stuff!?!?

*Grabs bucket* BLAAAAAAAGH DX


my eyes have been ruined once again. *Cries*
 

PatSilverFox

New member
Apr 2, 2011
498
0
0
Wait what about...
Furry Vore

I think it is more tolerable than vore actually.
Well that's probably because it isn't real.