If an evil man cures a deadly sickness. He had to kill 50,000 people to do it! Do we accept his findings or do we discard it? What if we discard it and it kills 200,000 more people before a cure is found in an "un-evil" way.
Is it more moral, to allow the evil mans findings go to pot and allow 200,000 more people die because his findings were evil? Which is more evil?
And why?

Is it more moral, to allow the evil mans findings go to pot and allow 200,000 more people die because his findings were evil? Which is more evil?
And why?