Poll: Which RTS sequel do you want the most?
- Thread starter LookingGlass
- Start date
Recommended Videos
7th Legion 2
but more of the "we're doing it right this time" kind of sequel, like Two Worlds 2
god knows we need more RTS about space marines riding velociraptors and fighting mechs
but more of the "we're doing it right this time" kind of sequel, like Two Worlds 2
god knows we need more RTS about space marines riding velociraptors and fighting mechs
A toss up for me between Warcraft 4 and Rome Total War 2. Either of them would be amazing. Probably leaning towards Warcraft 4 more, mainly because I like fantasy and I've not liked the feel of Creative Asselmbly's recent RTS's but that's just personal opinion.
This one. With the incredible advances made in game play during Shogun 2, I would love to see it applied to Rome. The range indicator for archers and the Margin of Error for artillery are the things I most look forward to. Hopefully, they expand it to include more of Asia since it would be a lot of fun to lead Rome to war against China.back pain said:
Homeworld 3 all the way. No other RTS has managed to get true 3d space combat right. There have been games that have come close, but they all pale in comparison to the true master. Its a shame relic is too tied up making more Dawn of War games. Not that I'm complaining, those are good as well.
I'd be tempted to say Warcraft 4, but then I remembered Rome: Total war. Warcraft 4 would be nice but it would be absolutely fucked lore-wise and I enjoyed the gameplay of Rome more. So my pick is Total War: Rome 2.
Hey I thought I was the only one!JaceArveduin said:
I loved BFME1 and 2....although both (especially the latter) were rather flawed. So yeah, BFME3, but get it right first time, EA. There is a hell of a lot to work with.
I'd also love a Mass Effect RTS but....
A sequel to Conmmand and Conquer 3: Tiberium War. I would very much like to know what happend after the...
Shut up, there is no sequel called Tiberian Twilight. That's just a legend to scare of the fans. Right?
Shut up, there is no sequel called Tiberian Twilight. That's just a legend to scare of the fans. Right?
I can't see what they could add to the Homeworld story, Cataclysm/2 were arguably unneccessary to begin with, a third one? Hm. But they were still both enjoyable, and managed to get space based RTS mechanics right, so maybe Homeworld 3 if they took it into a more competetive direction? I could get behind that.
I'm surprised by the lack of love for World in Conflict. It was basically an RTS game for action game fans... I thought it would be more successful. It wasn't as strategic as your typical RTS (I suppose it's more of a real-time-tactical game), but damn it was fun.
It's a pity that Massive Entertainment got eaten by Ubisoft and put to work on their popular franchises (Assassin's Creed, Far Cry). Although I just read "On August 6, 2008, Activision Blizzard put up Massive Entertainment for sale after the merger of Activision and Vivendi Games and the subsequent internal reorganization", so I guess Activision Blizzard are just as much to blame, for not realising they were sitting on a good thing.
Also, despite the team long being shut down, someone could've mentioned the wondrous creation that was Sacrifice.
It's a pity that Massive Entertainment got eaten by Ubisoft and put to work on their popular franchises (Assassin's Creed, Far Cry). Although I just read "On August 6, 2008, Activision Blizzard put up Massive Entertainment for sale after the merger of Activision and Vivendi Games and the subsequent internal reorganization", so I guess Activision Blizzard are just as much to blame, for not realising they were sitting on a good thing.
Also, despite the team long being shut down, someone could've mentioned the wondrous creation that was Sacrifice.
