Sean Connery, far and away.
Pierce Brosnan was good, admittedly, but the films that he was in were somewhat ridiculous, and he was too much of a pretty boy. Bond is a womaniser true, but he's also ruthless and deadly, and I just didn't buy that in Brosnan.
Daniel Craig is good too, but he's gone for the other extreme; he's a hardened killer, but he's too cold, too distanced. His Bond has no sense of humour, and his womanising is semi-believable, at best.
I like the both of them, but Sean Connery was the perfect balance of hardened killer and almost obsessive womaniser. Besides, every single Bond film that he was in was just plain awesome.
Pierce Brosnan was good, admittedly, but the films that he was in were somewhat ridiculous, and he was too much of a pretty boy. Bond is a womaniser true, but he's also ruthless and deadly, and I just didn't buy that in Brosnan.
Daniel Craig is good too, but he's gone for the other extreme; he's a hardened killer, but he's too cold, too distanced. His Bond has no sense of humour, and his womanising is semi-believable, at best.
I like the both of them, but Sean Connery was the perfect balance of hardened killer and almost obsessive womaniser. Besides, every single Bond film that he was in was just plain awesome.