Poll: Who was the better Peter Parker/Spider-man

Recommended Videos
Apr 17, 2009
1,751
0
0
Eh, gotta go with Maguire. Sure, he comes across as a bit too much of a milquetoast caricature at times, but thats better than the smarmy wise-ass caricature Garfield got lumbered with. Maybe its just me but he simply comes across as a massive douche, not a likeable smart-alec. Not do I ever buy that he's supposed to be a genius. They have him try to be a science wunderkind, building gadgets and solving equations, but nothing else he does is smart so it just comes across as intelligence ex machina. Someone who has to look up how freaking batteries work does not have the grasp on engineering and physics needed to make those web-shooters.

I give Garfield's Spider-Man credit in that he went through an actual arc (well, in the first one anyway...) as opposed to instantly becoming Saint Peter of Spiders like he does in the Raimi films, but thats really the only positive I can give him. They don't make him likeable, they don't make him smart, and even his trademark quipping is ruined by being poorly written and the way they just have him stand around doing nothing while spouting them off. Comics Spidey has some clever lines and is generally leaping about saving people or stopping the bad guy while he rattles them out, Garfield Spidey just parades a series of troll-esque insults (really, thats where he said he drew inspiration from) with no wit behind them and is either letting people be put in danger (the van chase with pre-power armour Rhino in ASM2 when he's just chatting with a guy who's driving around crushing police cars and who knows how many civilians) or just needlessly dragging things out (that car-jacker-who's-really-a-cop in ASM1) which makes him come across as a bully. Ugh. Give me Maguire and his slightly dopey optimism any day
 

Madnack45

New member
Feb 15, 2015
31
0
0
Pallindromemordnillap said:
Eh, gotta go with Maguire. Sure, he comes across as a bit too much of a milquetoast caricature at times, but thats better than the smarmy wise-ass caricature Garfield got lumbered with. Maybe its just me but he simply comes across as a massive douche, not a likeable smart-alec. Not do I ever buy that he's supposed to be a genius. They have him try to be a science wunderkind, building gadgets and solving equations, but nothing else he does is smart so it just comes across as intelligence ex machina. Someone who has to look up how freaking batteries work does not have the grasp on engineering and physics needed to make those web-shooters.

I give Garfield's Spider-Man credit in that he went through an actual arc (well, in the first one anyway...) as opposed to instantly becoming Saint Peter of Spiders like he does in the Raimi films, but thats really the only positive I can give him. They don't make him likeable, they don't make him smart, and even his trademark quipping is ruined by being poorly written and the way they just have him stand around doing nothing while spouting them off. Comics Spidey has some clever lines and is generally leaping about saving people or stopping the bad guy while he rattles them out, Garfield Spidey just parades a series of troll-esque insults (really, thats where he said he drew inspiration from) with no wit behind them and is either letting people be put in danger (the van chase with pre-power armour Rhino in ASM2 when he's just chatting with a guy who's driving around crushing police cars and who knows how many civilians) or just needlessly dragging things out (that car-jacker-who's-really-a-cop in ASM1) which makes him come across as a bully. Ugh. Give me Maguire and his slightly dopey optimism any day
Garfield fights the lizard while protecting the school, saves a kid from a burning car, calms electro down, hunts the lizard, etc. the truck scene was his first tuck up behind the writing.
 
Apr 17, 2009
1,751
0
0
Sorry, Madnack, what point are you trying to make exactly? Because you seem to be trying to disprove that Spider-Garfield doesn't save innocents...which wasn't actually my point. I'm pointing out that the makers of the Amazing movie run into the same problem that the Raimi films ran into, that making Spidey quip and fight at the same time is often tricky to do. And they solve it either the same way, by simply not having him quip and fight at the same time. Its one or the other. In the Lizard fight, for example, he's just as quiet as Spider-Maguire whenever there's any action going, but stops completely whenever they want him to talk. At which point, if I remember rightly, the Lizard bursts out of the cocoon he was trapped in. So he just let the bad guy get free, all for a quip that wasn't even very good. Its just shitty writing
 

VintageNHC

New member
Feb 19, 2015
10
0
0
I'm leaning more towards Maguire, because I enjoyed his Spider-Man movies much more than I did Garfield's films. I'm not saying he isn't good as Spidey, but I just enjoy the original films more.