i agree with you, i must say i did enjoy the way he made them out to be.bobby1361 said:I think Darren Shan does vampires in an interesting way.
12 books about them too.
i agree with you, i must say i did enjoy the way he made them out to be.bobby1361 said:I think Darren Shan does vampires in an interesting way.
12 books about them too.
i.e., it actually makes sense, and it's not the traditional (shit) American-dying-a-hero ending, it's a really good one. They almost put it in the film too, but the test audiences didn't respond well.SendMeNoodz84 said:Other. Richard Matheson's vampires in I Am Legend.
The book is different from the movie.
Excellently stated. There's still characters from the setting that I remember, long after the world's been retired by the publisher.Gildan Bladeborn said:Personally I'm partial to the vampires from White Wolf's original World of Darkness. Not vampires created by people who actually play that game, as they tend to trend along the ridiculous angst-filled "Anne Rice" template, but the stuff from the background itself or the novels - even the 'good guys' are inhuman monsters, and the bad ones... well they're the stuff that nightmares would have in a nightmare.
The world may never know.RAND00M said:Who are those 8 who voted for Stephenie Meyer?
Okay, okay; Let's say 95% of ones voting Stoker haven't.Lexodus said:How dare you, sir. I most certainly have.
I guess that's the origin of today's "dumpling vampire". Making the monster sympathetic, then giving him a tragic love story and ultimatly turning him into a romantic hero. And unfortunatly the modern romantic hero is a creampuff.L1250 said:Yeah, in the book, Dracula didn't have any humanizing characteristics. He was basically a monster terrorizing the protagonists for fun. I've heard that most adaptations tried to make him more sympathetic for some reason.GruntOwner said:The movie with Keanu Reeves. I had heard somewhere that it was basically a the novel but in movie form and with Reeves, so I figured the book was also about him going after some lass because she reminded him of his wife... Was I misinformed? Guess I'd best edit that post either way.L1250 said:I don't recall this ever being mentioned in Dracula. Did you get that idea from an adaptation?GruntOwner said:Bram certainly did a good job of popularizing them, though the idea of someone not getting over their wife after 3 brides and a century just seems so... Clingy. It's like Vlad Topes was some socially inept teen who can't get over that girl he sat behind in high school.
When you put it that.You're right.The_Oracle said:The world may never know.RAND00M said:Who are those 8 who voted for Stephenie Meyer?
But then again, if you could...would you really want to?
As have I. It's a decidedly mediocre book from a writing perspective, full of plotholes and contradictions (at one point, Dracula is even seen walking around during the day AFTER it's been established he can't do that!)Lexodus said:How dare you, sir. I most certainly have.Zand88 said:Let's all vote from Bram Stoker, even though no one here has probably even picked up his work. xD
That seems a bit high. There are around 50 Stoker votes at the moment, so 5% means 2.5 people, or .5 after considering Lexodus and I. There's got to be at least one other person or bloody upper half of one here who's read Dracula.Zand88 said:Okay, okay; Let's say 95% of ones voting Stoker haven't.Lexodus said:How dare you, sir. I most certainly have.