Poll: Whos not getting COD MW2?

Recommended Videos

Asehujiko

New member
Feb 25, 2008
2,119
0
0
TriGGeR_HaPPy said:
Just FYI, Modern Warfare 2 is (technically) CoD 6, not CoD 5...

But yea... I voted "When it's cheap", like what I usually do.
I'm not sure what else I'm supposed to say, what I voted speaks for itself...
Considering IW does not count games not made by them, this is CoD4. MW1 is referred to as CoD3 in the game files.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
scotth266 said:
COD 5?

Isn't it COD 6, considering that World At War was number 5?

Anyway, this is atypical "cry some moar" behavior over a game that hasn't even been released yet. Wait and play it for yourself before making judgments about it.
I have to admit. I'll be the first to bow down if it does anything that the last 30 FPS's didn't already do. (To be fair I won't clump TF2 into that because it really did knock my socks off when I played it)

I hate to sound like one of those 'moar cryers' but it really doesn't seem like FPS's have been expanding on anything since the ole rare days.

The original FPS era seemed to be like game after game of improving on what the previous's had done poorly and securing what they did well. Now it just seems like doing the same thing with a different skin over the map and characters. That's my two cents on the matter at least.

Not that it really matters. You figure if Jonas Brothers and Miley Cyrus can make millions, no matter how bad a game is it'll make a few mil with the right advertising and multiplayer (since people love competition).

Or to quote someone more recent:

-Seraph- said:
Played the first one, thought it was a pile of generic crap and was grateful I borrowed it instead of spending 60 bucks for something 2 years after it came out. The multiplayer in the second one looks okay despite some of the retarded things I have heard, but if it's anything like the first game, it's a waste of money and something I will likely borrow once and then forget it's existence among all the other dry and vapid FPS's.
If you like Multiplayer just get Combat Arms. It is free and has just as much functionality as most new 60 dollar (or more) FPS's :p.
 

AlphaOmega

New member
Oct 10, 2008
1,732
0
0
Nope, I voted when its cheap because eventually I will ofc but that wont be for the next few years.

I just dont like regenerating health Brown FPS's. to each their own :)
 

Chipperz

New member
Apr 27, 2009
2,593
0
0
I aint getting it. Activision are gouging us in England.

Also, it's Activision. I'm not getting one of their games firsthand again for the rest of time.
 

Hamster at Dawn

It's Hazard Time!
Mar 19, 2008
1,650
0
0
ODST should keep me busy for a while and IN MY OPINION it's more fun than COD which is not bad but I don't get the hype around it. Probably a rental for the SP, MP is not my cup of tea.
 

EchoCharlie

New member
Aug 26, 2008
11
0
0
You should all be playing Red Orchestra/Darkest Hour. Once you go online with that and learn some skills you won't go back to that COD nonsense...You'll save some money too.
 

Octorok

New member
May 28, 2009
1,461
0
0
Hella yes. I've received many weeks of fun from CoD4 and even squeezed some from WaW, with difficulty, and this looks like it's better than any of them. I trust in Infinity Ward - to me they've always gone the right way with the series and I see no reason why they'd be going wrong now.

But I'm happily rich so I'll also be buying Borderlands, Assassin's Creed 2, Left 4 Dead 2 and Scribblenauts. And Dead Rising 2 when it comes out in 2050.