Poll: Would Minecraft be better with better graphics?

[TheYellowCellPhone]

Minecraft doesn't need a graphics update, it needs a content update. I like how it looks, and how you can customize it with texture packs.

 

[redisforever]

If you mean higher res textures, there are already texture packs. That depends on your preference.

Removing block is dumb, it won't be minecraft. It would be impossible to actually play the game.

 

[ajh93]

Graphics aren't really the problem with Minecraft.

there's a problem with Minecraft?! :O

hehe,just kidding

 

[00slash00]

nonononononono and more no. its charm comes from the simple graphics

 

[Nieroshai]

It has a built in feature that allows you to add texture packs, many of which on the net are either prettier or with better graphics. So if you want better graphics, just go look. I personally like my Zelda texture pack I downloaded, it's nice!

 

[PlasmaFrog]

This decision is entirely up to the user.

The whole reasoning behind Minecrafts original implementation of low-textured graphics was to create a retro-defined feel while maintaining a volume of simplicity; not to mention, it actually worked well since the blocks, after all, are just blocks as compared to pixels.

More reasoning is that this is being derived from a Java engine, meaning that graphics handling and memory capabilities are limited in comparison to higher-end engines that you see most games being developed on nowdays. Besides, realistic textures really don't do much for Minecraft since it wouldn't feel right for the gameplay. There are 64x64 texture packs that you can use out there, if equipped with mods; yet, it still feels as if it takes away the very soul of the game.

So, no. Minecraft doesn't need better graphics. It's perfectly fine the way it is. After all, graphics don't make a game. Remember the days of text-based adventures?

 

[TundraWolf]

This decision is entirely up to the user.

The whole reasoning behind Minecrafts original implementation of low-textured graphics was to create a retro-defined feel while maintaining a volume of simplicity; not to mention, it actually worked well since the blocks, after all, are just blocks as compared to pixels.

More reasoning is that this is being derived from a Java engine, meaning that graphics handling and memory capabilities are limited in comparison to higher-end engines that you see most games being developed on nowdays. Besides, realistic textures really don't do much for Minecraft since it wouldn't feel right for the gameplay. There are 64x64 texture packs that you can use out there, if equipped with mods; yet, it still feels as if it takes away the very soul of the game.

So, no. Minecraft doesn't need better graphics. It's perfectly fine the way it is. After all, graphics don't make a game. Remember the days of text-based adventures?

I completely agree except about the whole "losing the soul of the game" comment. I use a 64x64 pack (Ovo's Rustic Pack) that does an amazing job of making the game look more visually appealing while still maintaining that simple retro feel that Minecraft is all about.

That being said, I completely agree that the larger packs (128, 256 and the handful of 512's being developed) completely miss the point and change the game into some barely recognizable from its original intent. But there are definitely some texture packs that find a nice middle ground between the original feel and being more aesthetically pleasing.

Also, your avatar is amazing: what is it from?