Poll: Would multiplayer FPS Games be better without snipers.

Recommended Videos

Sephychu

New member
Dec 13, 2009
1,698
0
0
Sebenko said:
Sephychu said:
To avoid, you just have to be conscious of cover and staying out of their line of sight. Futhermore, playing as them is truly joyous, if a little tedious in brown, gritty fps games. TF2's sniper system is my favourite.
Agreed. Valve sure spent a lot of effort balancing everything.

If you don't like being sniped, be a scout, run rings around the offending sniper then "BAM!", scattergun (or, in my case, Force-a-nature) to the face. Or even pistol. I out-snipered a sniper that way once. With a good dose of luck, though.
Or, good ol' fashioned backstab. Easily substitutable with an Eyelander/Targe charge.
 

SilkySkyKitten

New member
Oct 20, 2009
1,021
0
0
No, although it would be nice if FPSs would somehow restrict the usage of a sniper rifle to being a long range weapon only and make it extremely impractical to use at close range (you know, like how sniper rifles are in reality). Being shot by a sniper who is only a few feet behind you is just annoying and wrong.
 

zombie711

New member
Aug 17, 2009
1,505
0
0
snipers= camper from far away (well in my opinion, but i will say any one who can get a kill from the other side of the map after waiting for 8 minutes, as every one runs around in a cluster F*ck is a decent player in my opinion, because I have no patience.)
 

razormint21

New member
Mar 29, 2010
215
0
0
The argument is "I like to snipe, but i dont want to get sniped"

A shooter without snipers would be like Gunz Online, just senseless action without strategy.
Seriously, sniping isnt just about having good trigger fingers, it's also about location and concealment. Making the shots count while being unseen...
 

Moriarty

New member
Apr 29, 2009
325
0
0
remove snipers and you see more action at the center of the map with everyone charging at the nearest rumble they can find. It can be fun to play that way, but it grows old quickly
 

Sunstrike

New member
Mar 29, 2010
65
0
0
No, the only problem I have is with dumb snipers, and really if they are going to be dumb while sniping, they are going to be dumb with any class.

All the more power to the good snipers out there, I may not enjoy dieing to it, but I can definatly respect those who get jumping headshot noscopes from half the map away consistently.

That and in MOST games snipers have very defined and useful roles, and the game would be worse off without them. EG TF2: heavy/medic combo removal BFBC2: long range spotting, MG turret killing, maphack motion sensor ect et ect.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
Deadlock Radium said:
Would wars be better without snipers?
Sniping is a crucial part of the "war-feeling" in games, without snipers, it's not a war game.

I don't have any problems with snipers.
The only thing games could be without is NoobTubes. I hate those.
[SUB]Going against NoobTubers with a single fire M14 Assault Rifle is hell..[/SUB]
this. if snipers would be removed then the stupid speed knifers and shotgunners would become even more unbalanced (in mw2) and in other games people could just run around without a care in the world wielding a noobtube launcher
 

Phenakist

New member
Feb 25, 2009
589
0
0
Newkenyanguy said:
Phenakist said:
You just need sniping, sniping in BC2 is the difference between most Arms/Disarms on Rush, and therefore play a big part in the game, not to sound boastful, but I've probably been the difference between winning and loosing games when I've been sniping for that very reason, everyone else just runs around like headless chickens trying to get kills nowhere near the OBJECTIVES and if there's a plant (because one enemy has just effortlessly sprinted through behind a bit of cover) they'll only move towards it when the beeping gets to it's highest and there's 2 seconds left on the thing. You know it's true.
depends on the balance of the team, nothing worse than having 10 of 12 players being snipers as it ends with rush games ending with the defends winning without even needing to try. I admit I do love some sniping but I find it doesnt win games too often
Of course, I wouldn't go sniper unless there were none or up to 2 others, or the team was especially useless and seemingly didn't know that you actually had to plant on/disarm the objectives (which seems to happen far too much)and just needed someone crazy enough to fight through the flimsy defensive lines and actually plant the thing. (BTW have you noticed hardly anyone can seem to fly the helicopters well? or at all for that matter? you always get so many people that THINK they can fly them...(This is is topic related because they are insanely easy sniping targets for anyone who understands basic bullet physics))
 

TelHybrid

New member
May 16, 2009
1,785
0
0
No.

They're as much a vital part of FPS games as the assault rifle, smg, and pistol.

Just because you keep getting killed by snipers doesn't mean they're cheap as the thread subject matter implies, just means you need to change your tactics and stop running out into the middle of a map making yourself an easy target.

God I hate when people make their own rules for online... such whiney people.
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,718
0
0
Ghostkai said:
Snipers stop people from running around without a care in the world.

Keep em.
This game me the mental image that online gaming would be about skipping and happily singing hymms if it weren't for those menacing snipers.
 

Alex The Rat

New member
Jan 8, 2010
187
0
0
I don't think games would be better off without them, I just think that most shooters make sniping FAR too easy. Snipers should fulfill an important roll on the battlefield, but if somebody playing a sniper class is regularly responsible for the majority of kills on a team, then the game is making it too easy.
 

Lordmarkus

New member
Jun 6, 2009
1,384
0
0
The RageGamer? in me screams "Yes!" but to remove snipers from a war game would be to take away much of the supposed reality in the game. Besides, it's nice to snipe and practise your aim once in a while.
 

MetallicaRulez0

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,503
0
0
Snipers are easy to avoid anyways. Here's a hint; if you're out in the middle of the map with no cover, you're going to die. They don't call the middle of the map "No Man's Land" for nothing.
 

Andantil

New member
May 10, 2009
575
0
0
we need more than snipers. we need artillery shells raining down and landmines and shit.
 

NinjaKirby1322

New member
Feb 25, 2009
99
0
0
I typically play as an Assault or Medic style class. I'm out on the front lines either giving support to the most aggressive players out there or being the objective runner myself. Of course, concentrating on the forces around the objective leaves me open to snipers. A fair share of my deaths, in fact, are headshots shot from hundreds of yards away from the objective.

That doesn't mean I would rather not have snipers. If my team's snipers are doing their primary job, I am actually able to concentrate more. I don't have to worry about a swarm of enemies coming through my current location because they're being picked off. Get a helpful sniper, and he'll even call out enemies he couldn't pick off. By having that outside support, I don't have to constantly glance around like a nervous meerkat. Cover fire is just as effective as physical cover.

Plus, having a sniper save your life by braining someone charging at you just looks awesome.