Japanese television is weird...
OT: No, I wouldn't. Not because he's a guy, but I just don't like him.
OT: No, I wouldn't. Not because he's a guy, but I just don't like him.
He's...he's...GORGEOUS!!!!!jamescorck said:There's only one "man" I would go gay for.
![]()
Awwww, yeah.
I appear to have waited too long. Hail, ninja. Well posted.Hitokiri_Gensai said:id go straight for him! *giggles* what a cutie.
DuplicateValue said:Wasn't that something to do with the IRA?itf cho said:Ever seen The Crying Game?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104036/synopsisMarik2 said:And no Ive never seen this crying game I dont spend much time online or watch much TV.
Shoqiyqa said:Also needs an 'already gay, do want!' option (and a don't want).Hitokiri_Gensai said:There was an option missing from the poll: "Would go straight for this man."
Further to this, even with options of:Zeithri said:Allow me to give you four terms;Macgyvercas said:I...have no words to describe my confusion. How can a guy look like THAT?!
* Transexual on hormones
* Crossdresser with Androgynus apperance
* Androgynus Male
* Intersex
At OP;
All I can say is that I envy her feminim apperance
Not only is female genital mutilation (FGM) being practiced relatively widely in the United States, it's happening in the most hallowed halls of American medical science. In fact, the head of the pediatric urology department at Cornell University's New York Presbyterian Hospital -- which is often ranked among the top 10 hospitals in the country -- has been operating on young girls who suffer from what he (and likely the girls' guardians) have decided is "clitorimegaly," or oversized clitorises.
How does the good doctor know that nerves have been spared? Well, Poppas and his nurse practitioner developed a series of sensory followup tests involving Q-tips, their fingernails and vibrators. But don't worry, a family member was always present in the room.
When Dreger told Ken Zucker, a child psychologist about how Poppas used a vibrator to test a little girl's clitoral sensation, he said: "Applying a vibrator to a six-year-old girl's surgically feminized clitoris is developmentally inappropriate."
Sounds like one of the mad doctors in City Of Villains, doesn't it?Bad Vibrations [http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Bioethicsforum/Post.aspx?id=4730&blogid=140]
Solomon's insights come to mind as we read the 2007 Journal of Urology paper, "Nerve Sparing Ventral Clitoroplasty: Analysis of Clitoral Sensitivity and Viability" by Jennifer Yang, Diane Felsen, and Dix P. Poppas. Writing in the typically dry, quantifying language of modern medicine, the authors report why they believe Poppas, a pediatric urologist at New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, has left a group of girls still able to have sexual sensation after he has removed parts of the girls' clitorises. With parental consent, these girls' clitorises have been cut down in size after the physician deemed these clitorises too big.
... Rather, we are writing to express our shock and concern over the follow-up examination techniques described in the 2007 article by Yang, Felsen, and Poppas. Indeed, when a colleague first alerted us to these follow-up exams - which involve Poppas stimulating the girls' clitorises with vibrators while the girls, aged six and older, are conscious - we were so stunned that we did not believe it until we looked up his publications ourselves.
Here more specifically is, apparently, what is happening: At annual visits after the surgery, while a parent watches, Poppas touches the daughter's surgically shortened clitoris with a cotton-tip applicator and/or with a "vibratory device," and the girl is asked to report to Poppas how strongly she feels him touching her clitoris. Using the vibrator, he also touches her on her inner thigh, her labia minora, and the introitus of her vagina, asking her to report, on a scale of 0 (no sensation) to 5 (maximum), how strongly she feels the touch. Yang, Felsen, and Poppas also report a "capillary perfusion testing," which means a physician or nurse pushes a finger nail on the girl's clitoris to see if the blood goes away and comes back, a sign of healthy tissue. Poppas has indicated in this article and elsewhere that ideally he seeks to conduct annual exams with these girls. He intends to chart the development of their sexual sensation over time.
In the course of our inquiries, made in preparation for this publication, nearly all clinicians to whom we described Poppas's "clitoral sensory testing and vibratory sensory testing" practices thought them so outrageous that they told us we must have the facts wrong. When we showed them the 2007 article, their disbelief ceased, but they then seemed to become as agitated as we were.
I will admit he makes a very pretty lady, but no I wouldn't. There is a difference between going gay for someone like Sean Connery and going gay for a guy that makes a pretty lady. When I date a pretty lady I expect a vagina and boobs under the clothes.Marik2 said:So I started wondering "Would I go gay for him if he was a nice person and looked like that?"