Poll: Would you marry someone only if the sex was good?

[bdcjacko]

Eh, I was joking. I couldnt do hourly either. Daily is my limit.

I figured as much, but still wanted to go into my tangent.

 

[bdcjacko]

Ah, a response thread already. I am not surprised.

And no, I wouldn't.

No sex = no marriage.
Only sex = no marriage.

Which is the fallacy in both threads. Which, I'm guessing, is your point.

Interestingly, I thought your thread was going to ask if I would refuse to marry someone who was bad at sex. That is a much more interesting question, IMO. ^^

Damnit...that is a good question. I'll save that for next week when there is a new rash of "I'm asexual but think everyone else is weird for having sex" threads start to show up.

 

[Lizmichi]

No, if you wanted sex you could find someone easy but I'm after a connection, love and so much more. Sex can get better the longer you stay together.

 

[Gigano]

No, that's not sufficient reason for such an influential decision of singular commitment.

I might start campaigning more actively for bigamy being legalised though.

 

[loc978]

daily/weekly

What is this daily/weekly business? Try Hourly. XD

oka, seriously though, no. One day, they looks will fade and you'll be left with a shell of what was and the dreams of what could have been.

I've been lucky in this aspect where the girls I've chased/have chased me have been beautiful and have a good personality.

If you can have sex more than 3 times a day for more than a week, then my hat is off to you.

But speaking from experience, I've had a weekend of hourly sex. And by monday I was happy to be at work so my parts could rest.

...2 per day is a bare minimum required to keep me from being frustrated (one upon waking, one before sleeping). 5 is preferable (twice upon waking, thrice before sleeping), and I'm capable of sustaining much more than that.

...no need for the hat, though. I'm just insatiable. Makes me wish for riches and land in Saudi Arabia. I could get used to having a harem.

 

[GeorgW]

No, not enough. Why not just be sex buddies?

*Update*
Lets suppose a 2 or 3 month dating period, but after that the person demands marriage if you want to keep up the sexual whirlwind.

Aw, why ruin the fun? In that case yeah, but it'd have to be an open marriage. That way my sexual need would be fulfilled while my intelectual and emotional ones can go in search of someone that can fullfil them.

 

[Bara_no_Hime]

Damnit...that is a good question. I'll save that for next week when there is a new rash of "I'm asexual but think everyone else is weird for having sex" threads start to show up.

Cool. ^^

PM me if/when you actually post it, so I don't miss it. I'll post my answer then.

 

[TheYellowCellPhone]

A marriage like that would last minutes before shit starts hitting the fan.

No.

 

[bdcjacko]

Damnit...that is a good question. I'll save that for next week when there is a new rash of "I'm asexual but think everyone else is weird for having sex" threads start to show up.

Cool. ^^

PM me if/when you actually post it, so I don't miss it. I'll post my answer then.

Will do. I would do it now, but it would be to obivious.

 

[[.redacted]]

No chance, even if you thought that sex was as important in a relationship as actually liking someone, you're gonna get old together.

Enjoy.

 

[Smooth Operator]

Fundamental flaw in that plan, the marriage does not legally bind your partner to have sex with you, and trust me sooner or later they wont, but it does sign half of your assets over to your partner, and in most cases women get more then half.

Marriage is unwise by default, and sex is just the worst possible reason for it.

 

[bdcjacko]

Fundamental flaw in that plan, the marriage does not legally bind your partner to have sex with you, and trust me sooner or later they wont, but it does sign half of your assets over to your partner, and in most cases women get more then half.

Marriage is unwise by default, and sex is just the worst possible reason for it.

Yeah, but this person likes your sex and your sex alone, and this is hypothetical and follow my rules, not your "logic."

 

[jhlip]

As Ron White said, "You can't fix stupid". So no, no marriage for only the sex.

 

[BENZOOKA]

No, if you wanted sex you could find someone easy but I'm after a connection, love and so much more. Sex can get better the longer you stay together.

Exactly this kind of a deal.

Although I'm probably not going to marry anyone, but if just talking about a serious long-term relationship: no.

 

[Pearwood]

*Update*
Lets suppose a 2 or 3 month dating period, but after that the person demands marriage if you want to keep up the sexual whirlwind.

2-3 months is ridiculous if it's someone you just met. I don't know anyone male or female who thinks that getting married after 3 months of knowing someone is smart. I'd say no just on that basis but no I wouldn't marry someone just for sex.

 

[BoredDragon]

Depends on how big her cock is.

What I am saying here is that would be really fucking stupid

wait, WHAAAAAAAA!?!

 

[bdcjacko]

*Update*
Lets suppose a 2 or 3 month dating period, but after that the person demands marriage if you want to keep up the sexual whirlwind.

2-3 months is ridiculous if it's someone you just met. I don't know anyone male or female who thinks that getting married after 3 months of knowing someone is smart. I'd say no just on that basis but no I wouldn't marry someone just for sex.

It is just hypothetical and a way to say you knew the person for some time before hand. As you can tell this is just a "stupid" yes or no question. No need to read into it too much. Geez.

 

[Brandon237]

I am disappointed that 12 people said yes.
Very disappointed.

So that is a no from me, meaningful, loving relationship is more important that the sex being great, by a pretty decent amount too.

 

[bdcjacko]

I'm willing to bet the people who said yes are probably at least in their mid 20s and have been in at least one serious relationship that end because of a lack of at least mildly entertaining sex. I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong. I'm just willing to bet the people that have said yes have had more experience in the matter. I also think plenty of people who have had the same level of experience said no.