Poll: Would you press the button

[Helmholtz Watson]

Mass murder for sexual gratification? I'm gonna say no to that.

I read that and immiedately thought of this guy..

Spoiler: a classy guy

Caligula, quite the emperor

Hmmm....if it meant nobody close to me, nobody pontifically important, sure why not.

 

[ElPatron]

virtually the same as

"Irregardless", manslaughter is not as serious as murder. Otherwise it would result in similar sentences.

i could care less about getting laid

 

[Volstag9]

I am slightly disturbed that there are people actually pressing the button.

I wouldn't press it, and I'm a creepy asshole.

 

[Kyr Knightbane]

I... I would not. Not giving the hypothetical 30% of my gender a chance seems petty, selfish and rather dickish.

 

[dagens24]

I have a hard enough time satisfying one woman; why would I want more?

 

[GmonXyZ]

Only once!?

It'll probably piss off a lot of people..

I'll do it!

 

[ElPatron]

How funny since manslaughter wasn't being talked about here

It's "removing someone from existence in some manner". Death is not a linear thing, it rarely is equivalent to murder.

 

[cryogeist]

]

If it killed the all the ugly, fat, females? Then hell fuckin' yes. Otherwise... no.

so basically if they don't give you a hard-on then they should die?
no offence but that's equally fucked up.

 

[cryogeist]

]

If it killed the all the ugly, fat, females? Then hell fuckin' yes. Otherwise... no.

so basically if they don't give you a hard-on then they should die?
no offence but that's equally fucked up.

Fucked up as it may be it's more than sensible. The whole freakin point was that ridding these % of the gender would give you more chance of getting laid.

In you're mind that's sick no matter what other preferences are involved no? So why does it matter of they have to give him hard on?

If you need a % of the population to die in order to increase your chance of getting laid then maybe it's your fault somewhere.
(i may have misread your post a bit)

 

[Woodsey]

That sounds like something that's been dreamt up on one of the Escapist's relationship threads.

And no. (Not that I love sausage fests, but 30% is pretty extreme.)

 

[Mike Laserbeam]

Ridiculous question. Kill millions of people, just to get marginally more attention from the opposite sex?

No, obviously.

Movin' on...

 

[AngloDoom]

Who the hell isn't being noticed by potential partners because there are 'too many people'?

"I met this awesome girl the other day, but I don't think she really paid me much attention because 30% of the male population was in the way."

Chances are if you're not finding a partner, the problem doesn't lie with other people.

 

[Moonlight Butterfly]

What happens if you just hammer it?

Will you kill yourself eventually?

 

[Woodsey]

virtually the same as

"Irregardless", manslaughter is not as serious as murder. Otherwise it would result in similar sentences.

i could care less about getting laid

The irony being that 'could care less' is supposed to be received in a sarcastic manner. You know, that thing that us Brits keep saying Americans don't 'get'.

Which is why whenever you point it out to someone they always say "huh, I never thought about it, but you're right".

(Likewise, sarcasm doesn't become apparent just because what they're saying is completely retarded; it has to have some degree of intonation, which is always non-existent whenever someone says "I could care less".)