Poll: Would you rather be lucky or smart?

Recommended Videos

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
Lucky! Because you'll be better off, and dumb enough to convince yourself you are smart anyway.

I mean, people under-rate luck in the first place. In my case I am damn lucky I am a human being, born to wealthy parents, now in a stable job, in a stable country, in a part of the world that I can pass as a default acceptable guy. Yes, I am lucky to get all this dreaded privilege, to the point that it'll probably outweigh any other major factor in my life.

Contrapoints described wisdom as "just the means to sketch the bars to your own jail cell", and you could well be an intelligent person in a really rubbish set of circumstances that prevent you from really applying that intelligence in a meaningful way, and you could end up horribly bored with your job/livelihood.
 

Ugicywapih

New member
May 15, 2014
179
0
0
Ignorance is bliss. I guess blissful ignorance, even moreso.

Smart but unfortunate...? Eh, I don't envy Hawking.
 

Lifeonerth

New member
Oct 12, 2012
8
0
0
Not to sound arrogant, but I have tried the second option, and it has NOT worked out well for me so far. I have a very high IQ but fat lot of good it does me since my body has broken down and become profoundly disabled with a myriad of incurable, untreatable chronic and progressive illnesses that have stolen the last decade of my life after poisoning the first two and now seeming to deny me a future as well as a present without profound suffering. This has all been down to a lifetime of extremely bad luck. I tell people I am cursed with profoundly, ridiculously bad luck but they don?t believe me of course, that is until they are around long enough to see the pattern, like my husband. He is the one good thing left in my life, knock on wood!

On top of the obvious, the smarter you are, the more you see... and the more darkness you see in the world. Extremely smart people are notoriously plagued with existential depression, which is not an issue for the blissfully unaware. The saying, ?Ignorance is bliss? is a saying for a reason, because it has a universal truth to it. This is not to discount the vast and unassailable beauty also in the world, but when you are aware of the burgeoning darkness and how unnecessary so much of it is, when you try to devote your life to bringing light to that darkness however small, and that life fails and your efforts are neither understood nor appreciated because others canot understand you or follow your train of thought but merely gawp at you as if you were an alien with three heads, it can easily lead to despair.

Further, studies have actually beeen done on a closely related idea, that of skill or intelligence versus luck, and which matters more to outcomes with regard to leading a successful life. Guess which wins? Luck wins out over skill handily, which explains why for example I could never get a promotion when I was able to work because very high intelligence is threatening to those who do not have it, which is the vast majority of the world. Instead, I found myself reporting to bosses who were not just less intelligent but profoundly so, and the higher up the chain you went, the greater the incompetence. It?s a miracle anything gets done in large organizaitons, really, because people tend to be promoted to the level of their incompetence, rather than the level of their skill. Luck plays an even greater role in entrepreneurial ventures. Just ask my husband, a lifelong entrepreneur. Here is one article that touches on this interesting subject, though there are others and maybe better ones.

https://www.wired.com/2012/11/luck-and-skill-untangled-qa-with-michael-mauboussin/

It seems we are not adept at recognising the role that luck plays in our lives, and thus we naturally undervalue it. I have not had that luxury, as my luck has been SO bad as to be catastrophic. I have worked at the problems all my life with every ounce of intelligence I have, including going to medical school myself and working in biomedical research to attempt to unravel the mystery of my failing health, but my health failed faster than I could keep up and I was unable to complete the full program. My health is not the only area in life in which my luck is abyssmally bad, just the most serious, because without our health we cannot do much of anything else. Most of us take our health for granted as a matter of course, without a second thought. It is a luxury beyond measure.

So yes, I would vastly prefer ignorance and luck... in fact, there have been times when I have thought I would prefer ignorance full stop on its own. Great intelligence is a great burden, and it is not appreciated or valued by our current culture. This is a disposable culture of soundbytes and vast ignorance. People react with open hostility to anyone who even sounds remotely smarter than they are, and even to the idea that we are not all ?equal?and uniform in every way. IQ research is fascinating but to the rest of the current Western culture, it is taboo. How ridiculous when it is patently obvious that some of us are smarter than others. We are not all carbon copies of each other, and thank goodness for it! We would all be so much better off if we were to value and leverage our intellectually gifted people as a society, but for now at least this is not happening. Truly smart people are shunned and ridiculed, passed over for job opportunities, marginalized and isolated. Being highly intelligent is in itself isolating, because there are so few people statistically who can relate to and understand your more esoteric thought processes.

Please note, I am not arguing against intelligence in a general sense. I wish our society would properly value and utilize our intelligent members. We would all be better off for it. I am merely expressing my personal opinion about my own life, since I have (I hope) unique experience in one part of the subject matter of this quiz. Though I am grateful for the beauty I have experienced and for the intellectual gifts I have, I would not wish this life on anyone, not even an enemy.
 

Drathnoxis

I love the smell of card games in the morning
Legacy
Sep 23, 2010
6,023
2,235
118
Just off-screen
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Lifeonerth said:
Weird, this site keeps turning my quotes and apostrophes into question marks...
Yeah, the forum doesn't like certain characters. I'm guessing you copied your post from Word or something similar which uses the quotation marks with the little tails on it. I always do a find and replace through Notepad.
 

Tsun Tzu

Feuer! Sperrfeuer! Los!
Legacy
Jul 19, 2010
1,620
83
33
Country
Free-Dom
"Years ago my mother used to say to me, she'd say, 'In this world, Elwood, you must be' - she always called me Elwood - 'In this world, Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant.'

Well, for years I was smart.

I recommend pleasant.

You may quote me."


- Elwood P. Dowd, "Harvey"
 

Carceri

New member
Jun 21, 2010
5
0
0
Being smart enough to reverse all the damage that being unlucky would cause would just end up exhausting you completely.
Being lucky and avoiding those problems in the first place seems a lot more practical.
 

Kae

That which exists in the absence of space.
Legacy
Nov 27, 2009
5,792
712
118
Country
The Dreamlands
Gender
Lose 1d20 sanity points.
Xsjadoblayde said:
Drathnoxis said:
Sorry, no. That's not one of the options available at this time.
Addendum_Forthcoming said:
Hence the above, is why I'm asking. Because I feel being lucky should be inseparable from happiness. Nobody really looks at that wealthy, young couple that seem perfect for eachother and thinks to themselves; "Sure, they may be happy ... but are they lucky?"

I think it's safe to say the luck was already part of their happiness.
As suspected. I distinctly remember being mysteriously considered a 'smart' creature in the past and how it did nothing but cause misery, in turning a constant demeanor of a miserably joyless twatface. So it would seem luck can avoid these oppressive pitfalls, and one can always train oneself to grow smarter with enough free time and effort once needed. Can't quite train luck, this ain't Skyrim. Did Skyrim even have luck? Well some rpg had it, and this ain't that!
Plenty of RPGs have them but the most notable example would be Fallout, in which the L of the S.P.E.C.I.A.L. system stands for Luck.
 

Secondhand Revenant

Recycle, Reduce, Redead
Legacy
Oct 29, 2014
2,566
141
68
Baator
Country
The Nine Hells
Gender
Male
Addendum_Forthcoming said:
The Decapitated Centaur said:
Lack of comprehension of things others understand would probably be notable. Which subjects I could engage in. Etc etc etc.

Ancient engineers and road builders didn't have 0 okay. Doesn't make them dumb, knowledge accumulates over time and things we take for granted weren't necessarily intuitive or clear

I enjoy understanding things. Maybe some people don't care, but I do
What, you understand everything you read? I don't. There's some stuff I can understand of sufficient complexity. Then there is somethings I just don't get. Maybe if I read enough of it, sure ... but who has time to actually understand a single thing? Like I could strip my motorcycle and put it back together, but I'm not going to study how the parts were machined, or even how all of it actually works beyond the fact that I know it will if I do all the right things and follow the technical service manual.

I can tell you how parts do work, what they do, but that's not the same as understanding. That's a combination of experience, technical manuals, and talking with people. But I'm pretty sure a mechanical engineer and metallurgist has a one up on me in terms of totally understanding each part.

As much as I love motorbikes, there is a (arbitrary) line between my love of motorbikes and my love of understanding everything about a motorbike.

Even when it comes to operations ... I can tell you how to do countersteering. I can show you how you countersteer. I can even explain the basics of it in terms of physics. But sure as shit a physicist is going to have a one up on me in that as well. They could probably represent it with enough information as a purely mathematical equation... which I'm fairly certain I won't understand.
The exaggeration and hyperbole don't really help make this a discussion so much as a me needing to correct you about my actual stance in really obnoxious ways

You clearly don't understand everything you read given there is nowhere in my post that I said that I did. It would be a significant reduction however. Less options. Certain things I enjoy now I would not be able to enjoy the same

Your post is an annoyingly long talk about how we don't all understand everything. Yes. Duh. How you could possibly *genuinely* think I said otherwise escapes me.

The fact there's many things I don't fully understand in no way implies that I should be fine with a further reduction and that it would not affect me.

Being dumb would also make it harder to have a generally okay grasp of things I don't want to spend all my time investigating

It may mean that things I do want to understand I may never be able to. And before I get an asinine reply of that already being the case for some subjects being dumb would expand it to more subjects
 

Drathnoxis

I love the smell of card games in the morning
Legacy
Sep 23, 2010
6,023
2,235
118
Just off-screen
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
LostGryphon said:
"Years ago my mother used to say to me, she'd say, 'In this world, Elwood, you must be' - she always called me Elwood - 'In this world, Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant.'

Well, for years I was smart.

I recommend pleasant.

You may quote me."


- Elwood P. Dowd, "Harvey"
I love Harvey!
 

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
Kaleion said:
Xsjadoblayde said:
Drathnoxis said:
Sorry, no. That's not one of the options available at this time.
Addendum_Forthcoming said:
Hence the above, is why I'm asking. Because I feel being lucky should be inseparable from happiness. Nobody really looks at that wealthy, young couple that seem perfect for eachother and thinks to themselves; "Sure, they may be happy ... but are they lucky?"

I think it's safe to say the luck was already part of their happiness.
As suspected. I distinctly remember being mysteriously considered a 'smart' creature in the past and how it did nothing but cause misery, in turning a constant demeanor of a miserably joyless twatface. So it would seem luck can avoid these oppressive pitfalls, and one can always train oneself to grow smarter with enough free time and effort once needed. Can't quite train luck, this ain't Skyrim. Did Skyrim even have luck? Well some rpg had it, and this ain't that!
Plenty of RPGs have them but the most notable example would be Fallout, in which the L of the S.P.E.C.I.A.L. system stands for Luck.
My favourite is in Call of Cthulhu, in which luck is a number that decreases every time you depend on it. Some people are luckier than others, but it will quite literally run out.