BUT MY PARENTS WOULD BE DEAD!
With all due seriousness, I wouldn't. I could never handle all that work.
With all due seriousness, I wouldn't. I could never handle all that work.
Perhaps I shouldn't bother even responding to this as you've got so much wrong from my comment.mikozero said:eh no spaceman12 was right. he's is a nutjob.
the important thing being he knows this and puts it to good use.
this is why the Batman film everyone (who knows the character) wants them make will never be made and people keep going on about it. Hollywood is never going to portray such a "mainstream" comic book hero and lead as such (tho to give him his due Michael Keaton did try to drop hints in way back when the first big budget film came out : "You wanna get nuts? Come on! Let's get nuts!" but even then they never quite grasped it right and it comes off like someone from DC whispered in their ear "he's secretly nuts btw")
i agree he's not nihilistic tho. dark (like a great many who know they have something wrong with them and aren't normal) yes. nihilistic no.
as for "conservative" i have no idea where that comes from unless secretly "conservatives" are driven by compulsion and obsession
his corporate wealth is a means to an end
his "pillar of the community background" is a front (hey maybe that is a conservative trait after all)
he doesn't work to "maintain order" (as the Joker knows fine well) and he does not work "for the state".
I disagree, or I wouldn't have posted it here.Tenmar said:Why is this in the religion and politics forum?
Some things shouldn't try to be politicized and this is one of them.
Interesting point. He is also selflessly giving without renumeration. Would that appeal to a Liberal?Agema said:Batman therefore holds down various ideas of being a successful, self-made, self-reliant man. Independent, taking action on his own. The state cannot protect it's own citizens, so those like Batman have to step up to defend everyone. That sort of thing is appealing to conservative ideology.
Now that's an interesting point.Gorfias said:I think it says something about the male psyche and socio-political world view. I think that's interesting and has other ramifications, like, why do we get 18 year olds to serve in the Marine Corp volunarily?
I think it was Movie Bob that wrote a couple of columns on how to save Bond: they need to understand that Bond is NOT Batman. He is not full of angst and all duty bound. He's having the time of his life on a combo of the government's dime and his gambling winnings.Agema said:Now that's an interesting point.Gorfias said:I think it says something about the male psyche and socio-political world view. I think that's interesting and has other ramifications, like, why do we get 18 year olds to serve in the Marine Corp volunarily?
I think a lot of action heroes in whatever media tap into a part of the male psyche that's about kicking ass for the betterment of oneself or the community. Although I suspect that aside from the geeky tech lovers, most males would probably rather be someone like James Bond. Less psychological damage (although Bond is a bit fucked up too).