The gun sites were in a tizzy after Magpul whipped that baby out at Shot Show. It looks pretty spiffy, though I'm definitely not looking forward to the flash or noise that little thing is going to produce. Hopefully whatever comp they put on it will help reduce that.Canid117 said:I highly doubt that the 6mm round has lower recoil than the 5.56. They are probably similar but I doubt it is actually lower. The problem with the 6mm round is that it is pretty exotic compared to much more common rounds like the 5.56 so logistics becomes a problem. There is one PDW that Magpul is working on that uses the 5.56 to alleviate these problems but it performs like a slightly shortened M4. I believe the barrel length is a choice between 10" and 12" while the standard M4 barrel is around 14.5". This means that it's stopping power drops off at range faster than assault rifles but then again it is a PDW and is meant to provide the power of an assault rifle with the size of a sub-machine gun.Geekosaurus said:Yeah the MR-110? I swear it used to be called something else. They also looked at the KAC PDW on Future Weapons. It uses a larger round than the standard 5.56 NATO round. and does more damage but has less recoil. Sounds like they should be adopting that too.Canid117 said:According to this site (and future weapons as I recall) the sniper they have at the top of their catalog is being adopted.Geekosaurus said:Anything from these guys - Knight's Armament:
http://www.knightarmco.com/
Better bullets and weapons are out there but governments aren't willing to pay the high prices that third party manufactures are charging. It's like that 'Dragon Skin' body armour - it's miles better than the armour soldiers are issued with, but governments wont buy it for their armies because it's just too expensive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magpul_PDR