Poll: You Discover Your Child Will Be...

Recommended Videos

TriggerUnhappy

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,530
0
0
(Spawned from a debate with a friend) Let's say, you're expecting a child with your girlfriend (or boyfriend, doesn't matter). However, within a week or two into the pregnancy, you're informed by the doctor that your child will grow up to have severe mental retardation. When I say that, I don't mean kind of slow in a charming Forrest Gump way, I mean they will never mentally develop past the age of a one year old. They will require constant care by you up until the day you die, and even beyond that by others such as relatives, workers at institutions, etc. Now in this position, what would you choose to do with this child?* Would you have it aborted, or perhaps give it up for adoption if you're against that sort of thing, or just choose to raise the child anyways, believing that your child's (and all) life is sacred? Regarding the abortion, there would be no health risks, and it would be within the first trimester.
*Question of thread placed in bold (also assuming your partner would agree with your decision)

Personally, I would choose to have the child aborted. Perhaps that makes me a total monster, but at my age (teenager), I'm still unsure if I would even want a child, and to be trapped with one for my entire life sounds horrifying. Not only that, but I know for a fact that I would be a horrible father and caregiver to any child like that. The loss of freedom from having a kid is something that I could deal with, because it's a commitment to raise your child, watch it learn and grow and eventually leave, thus ending the commitment. (partially, I understand there are still times where they may need help, but the fact is you're not still cleaning out their diapers) However, if your kid was like this, there would be no happiness or pride at watching them grow and develop, because they don't grow up, just grow older, and I view that more as being enslaved than anything else. Not only that, but they would eventually just become a burden to any relatives, for when me and my girlfriend finally die, they will have to foot the bill (or time and personal energy), to care for the kid, enslaving them as well.

I understand that many will view this question (and myself) with contempt, and will question how this could even be an issue. But, I personally find it to be a good question, for it is something a friend and I debated for quite some time, and neither of us are quite sure what we would actually do if placed in this predicament. So, what would you do? (and please elaborate, don't just vote)
 

Jackalb

New member
Dec 31, 2009
1,178
0
0
Woah finally an actual 'moral question' seriously you good sir have just cock-slapped all these poser threads of recent.

I feel terrible to say it but yes I would have it aborted. Unless my wife wanted to keep it of-course but if it was all down to me, well I just couldn't keep it.
 

Luftwaffles

New member
Apr 24, 2010
776
0
0
Id abort it. Of course, with my partners consent... If not, well...i'll try to do my best but tbh, i think id be extremely bitter about it.

ALSO, keep in mind that sometimes some people think indifferently about something, but then when it actually happens to them, they will have a change of heart. getwhatimean?
 

Tharwen

Ep. VI: Return of the turret
May 7, 2009
9,145
0
41
HG131 said:
Abort it without a second breath or though. It would be miserable
Actually, it probably wouldn't be upset at all, since it wouldn't be aware of anything being wrong. However...

HG131 said:
and more importantly, I would be miserable.
...this is a good point.
 

pope_of_larry

New member
Oct 18, 2009
408
0
0
abortion i would not want to live like that and i dont think they would ether. it seams like the rite thing to do
 

TriggerUnhappy

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,530
0
0
Jackalb said:
Woah finally an actual 'moral question' seriously you good sir have just cock-slapped all these poser threads of recent.

I feel terrible to say it but yes I would have it aborted. Unless my wife wanted to keep it of-course but if it was all down to me, well I just couldn't keep it.
Thank you good sir. I'm actually very surprised, I thought this thread would be filled with people "shocked" and "appalled" at how I could even dare question aborting the kid. Glad I was proved wrong. (so far at least)
 

Orwellian37

New member
Dec 22, 2009
271
0
0
Holy shit, real moral dilemmas. I also am a teen who can't bear the thought of kids right now. I'm not really sure what to say. I think all fetuses should get a shot at life, but the kid would be basically screwed from day one. Decisions, decisions...
 

JackRyan64

New member
May 22, 2010
295
0
0
ABORT MISSION! ABORT MISSION!

I don't know if I could stand a regular kid, let alone one that constantly required attention. Besides, it wouldn't have a chance to do anything, ever.
 

Drakmeire

Elite Member
Jun 27, 2009
2,590
0
41
Country
United States
I can't stand children so in order to prevent any possible chance of this happening I will buy those full-body-condoms from "The Naked Gun" and hope for the best.
sadly I would want to abort since I never believed someone like that can really get much pleasure out of life and would ruin the lives of many people in their family for simply existing I don't mean to sound cruel I just don't think they would want to live either...
wow that when from cheery to depressing really fast.
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,683
0
0
Realistically, a child who is known to be severely handicapped faces serious odds on actually being adopted. There's a very good chance they would wind up homeless after they aged out of the foster care system. I think it's a pretty cruel option. Something to consider.
 

BearCavalry9496

New member
May 14, 2010
95
0
0
As a teen, I would have it put up for adoption. I don't have the resources/money to raise a child, let alone a very disabled one. Depends on my partners thoughts though.
 

TriggerUnhappy

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,530
0
0
Dags90 said:
Realistically, a child who is known to be severely handicapped faces serious odds on actually being adopted. There's a good chance they would wind up homeless after they aged out of the foster care system. I think it's a pretty cruel option.
I know, but I figured I'd put the option in there anyways. It is quite cruel, but judging by the votes, some don't have the foresight to recognize that. What was your choice though, don't think you ever stated it?
 

ReckzB

New member
May 28, 2010
197
0
0
I'm still young myself, and truthfully, I don't see myself ever fathering a child. That said, if this were to happen to me, I think abortion would truly be the best way to go, there's just no place in this world for the child, in my view. As said; it would feel like slavery, to have your entire life and your family's even, taken by this being that will never do anything productive with their life, as such it would be utterly counter-productive to take care of theirs.

I don't care if I sound like a horrible being by saying this. If I ever had a child that was normal, and I knew it would grow up to be a mature human adult, then it's a different story, but this? There's no question here.

I will say that this is a good thread with a great scenario, well done.
 

Kif

New member
Jun 2, 2009
692
0
0
Okay, so a couple of weeks in... I'll buy into this and assume that predictive medical science is spectacularly good in this alternate universe. I would aim to have it aborted.

At that stage science believes the embryo is not even remotely human or aware and as such I would see it as better for the child to not be born into the life the Drs have suggested will occur. However, I would want a second opinion on the child's future.

The issue for me isn't the care I would have to give personally; I already spent a large part of my life caring for my mother. The issue for me is the life that child would live and how difficult it would be for them
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,683
0
0
TriggerUnhappy said:
I know, but I figured I'd put the option in there anyways. It is quite cruel, but judging by the votes, some don't have the foresight to recognize that. What was your choice though, don't think you ever stated it?
Yeah, I just wanted to get that out there for people who consider adoption a "soft option". I would first consider abortion, definitely. Raising a special needs child, especially one with severe mental retardation is expensive, emotionally and financially. One of my cousins is severely handicapped, probably at to the level this thread suggests. I wouldn't wish that on anyone if it could be prevented. Regardless of my financial status, I wouldn't want that.
 

xdgt

New member
Apr 27, 2010
352
0
0
I'd go for abortion (under the assumption that we both agree that is the best choice, if not then definately raising the child myself not giving up for adoption or sending him to an institute), that is because I have a view that life isn't sacred on its own merit but by the experiences it brings you, the joy and the sadness you encounter. A child like that would be limited in his experience, its hard enough for a normal person in this world to find bits of happiness to outweigh the pieces of sadness, it would be near impossible for such a child - that is not something I wish for my family and if I were to be in his place I would want the parents to abort me to save me years and decades of never fitting in this world and never being able to appreciate its beutiful side. That is not a decision I would make lightly and I would focus on what is truly best for the child not on what burden it would be on the parents.