Poll: You have to give up one sense - which one do you give up?

Recommended Videos

L3m0n_L1m3

New member
Jul 27, 2009
3,049
0
0
Pretty much what the title says. You're suddenly forced to give up one of your 5 basic senses. Which one would it be, and why?

Personally, I'd go with smell. While there are plenty of good scents in the world, there are an equal number of bad scents to go along with the good ones.
 

NeedAUserName

New member
Aug 7, 2008
3,803
0
0
Taste, easily. I can just sniff anything I really need to taste and get the same sensation anyway.
 

Mace Tulio

New member
Feb 5, 2011
282
0
0
I've always wondered what it would be like living without the feeling of touch. You'd certainly have a high pain threshold.
 

SaltyOrange

New member
Apr 28, 2011
92
0
0
Smell,I have a friend who cant smell almost anything because of a medical thing (I dont know exactly what it is) and he does well without it.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
Well, taste and smell are kind of interconnected, so giving up one would diminish the other.

I'd still give up my smell though.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Smell, of course.

You see, my sense of smell is ALREADY inoperable, so what's the diff?
 

Lionsfan

I miss my old avatar
Jan 29, 2010
2,842
0
0
Probably Taste. By the way I'm guessing this is in the wrong forum

Edit: Nevermind, I guess someone already moved it by the time my post was up
 

Shazbah

New member
Apr 14, 2009
24
0
0
I basically have no sense of smell so its easy for me, but it doesnt bother me.
Also for everyone saying touch, have fun. Pain is a good thing, let's you know when you're damaging your body. Those without the sense of touch end up biting their tounges and the inside of their cheeks constantly (hope you like the taste of blood) and also end up having many infections causing them serious problems, pancarese (sp?) is the main one, end's up swelling up and can burst before being removed. It then infects the blood steam and the rest of the body. Any small cut will be ignored (cant feel it obviously) and can become infected, which in turn will be ignored. I saw a documentary on this, and a little girl had burnt all the skin off her tounge after drinking hot chocolate. She was so young the parents didn't realise she didnt have a sense of touch, and yeh, lots of blood...
In the end, instead of becoming a superhero, you end up dying from any little infection.
So yeh, I'd go with taste or smell, leaning towards smell.
 

Furious Styles

New member
Jul 10, 2010
1,162
0
0
So long as it didn't affect my sense of taste, which it would, I'd go for smell just because I don't really care whether or not I can smell stuff.
 

William MacKay

New member
Oct 26, 2010
573
0
0
Mace Tulio said:
I've always wondered what it would be like living without the feeling of touch. You'd certainly have a high pain threshold.
actually, pain is a different sense. and only good if you regularly undergo torture. what if you acidentally left your hand in boiling water for half an hour.
 

Continuity

New member
May 20, 2010
2,053
0
0
L3m0n_L1m3 said:
Personally, I'd go with smell. While there are plenty of good scents in the world, there are an equal number of bad scents to go along with the good ones.
Yes, but sometimes the ability to sense a bas smell can be very important, ranging from your own BO to a gas leak in the house. Smell isn't a trivial as people often think it is, not only that but the sense of taste is actually heavily reliant on the olfactory bulb. In other words if you cant smell then you cant taste either - this is why your sense of taste is diminished when you have a cold and you nose is blocked.
 

plugav

New member
Mar 2, 2011
769
0
0
I think the sense of taste is the least likely to save my life, so I'd give up that if I had to.