Poll: Your game morality

[fun-with-a-gun]

im normally good on my first playthorough and evil on my second.

exactly this. But half the time I just get bored of killing everything on the evil play-through, and I don't actually finish it as an evil. Then there is always the "neutral ending" but that kind of sucks to go through giving everyone money then robbing them of everything else once they've turned around.

(also sorry for adding to your long list of quote messages.)

 

[The DSM]

First run: Good.

Second run: Evil.

3rd run: Which ever makes the most money.

Mostly just to see the diffrences.

 

[Geekosaurus]

It's just so much easier to be an evil douchebag.

 

[Duck Sandwich]

Spoiler: KOTOR

I was mostly Light Side in Knights O' the Ol' Republic 1, though I did get a few Dark Side points for fighting the drunks on Taris (they were douchebags, so I figured a righteous ass kicking was in order) and doing the Genoharadan sidequests (killing a dude before he could speak out and instigate an uprising of some sort)

Spoiler: Starcraft 2 minor spoilers

In Starcraft 2, I sided with the Protoss on the Haven mission. Figured it was better to be saving colonists and killing the infested ones than it was to be killing Protoss. I managed to complete the mission without letting any civilians get infested, so I found it kind of amusing when Hanson went apeshit on Raynor for "killing her children."

 

[Edavies696]

i usually opt for the good side of morality but i switch if the game gives me reason to, say if all of the good side rewards are rubbish or the characters on the good are just plain terrible and annoying