Poll: Your opinions on war.

Recommended Videos

Arsen

New member
Nov 26, 2008
2,705
0
0
I believe sincerely in option #2.

To make society sound, to ensure that people understand what is right and wrong, war must be permitted to take away those lesser values a society determines to be right and justified.
 

darthzew

New member
Jun 19, 2008
1,813
0
0
"There never was a good war, or a bad peace," - Benjamin Franklin.

However,

"There is a time for everything,
and a season for every activity under heaven:...
...a time to love and a time to hate,
a time for war and a time for peace."

Ecclesiastes 3: 1, 8. One of the few passages of the the Bible that I believe even atheists should listen to. Even the great Andrew Ryan quoted that one.

Back to war, I believe there is a time for it and that sometimes it's necessary. Look at the American Civil War. Without it, America would be nothing. And it was believed necessary at the time, or at least that's what Ralph Waldo Emerson believed.
 

TwistedEllipses

New member
Nov 18, 2008
2,041
0
0
Sorry, this may seem a bit stupid, but a lot of the options seem the same. What's the difference say between saying there are justifiable offensives and to have peace you must prepare for war?
 

Epictank of Wintown

New member
Jan 8, 2009
138
0
0
It's a necessary evil, I think. World War Two, for example, was a war that had to be fought to its resolution. On every front. The current war, if you ask me, is also a war that should be fought to its conclusion.

Then again, every war should be fought to its conclusion otherwise the lives lost in the conflict are for naught because nothing is resolved one way or the other. If that makes sense to anyone.

I'm tired.
 

Arsen

New member
Nov 26, 2008
2,705
0
0
carnkhan4 said:
Sorry, this may seem a bit stupid, but a lot of the options seem the same. What's the difference say between saying there are justifiable offensives and to have peace you must prepare for war?
Not all of them can be grouped together and many are in various gray areas.

But to answer it more specifically they mean this:

"There are justifiable offenses...."
When attacked, attack back. This is anti-pacifist.

"to have peace you must prepare for war..."
It is justifiable to attack another nation who can potentially harbor ill intentions towards you, though there isn't a complete and evident justification that everyone can agree upon.
 

darthzew

New member
Jun 19, 2008
1,813
0
0
carnkhan4 said:
Sorry, this may seem a bit stupid, but a lot of the options seem the same. What's the difference say between saying there are justifiable offensives and to have peace you must prepare for war?
Option A says that we should fight it.

The latter applies to Washington's quote, "To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace." It basically means that we should have guns, but probably not use them. It's a lot like Cold War mentality with arms races and all that. There wasn't much fighting between the US and Russia directly because they were afraid of each other.
 

Meatstorm

New member
Jan 4, 2009
239
0
0
self defence is is acceptable, but since it isnt always so obvious who started things there will always be invaders trying justifying their actions.
 

TwistedEllipses

New member
Nov 18, 2008
2,041
0
0
Arsen said:
carnkhan4 said:
Sorry, this may seem a bit stupid, but a lot of the options seem the same. What's the difference say between saying there are justifiable offensives and to have peace you must prepare for war?
Not all of them can be grouped together and many are in various gray areas.

But to answer it more specifically they mean this:

"There are justifiable offenses...."
When attacked, attack back. This is anti-pacifist.

"to have peace you must prepare for war..."
It is justifiable to attack another nation who can potentially harbor ill intentions towards you, though there isn't a complete and evident justification that everyone can agree upon.
Your definition of justifiable offences is the same as 'War is only there for defence' then surely??!
 

Aardvark

New member
Sep 9, 2008
1,721
0
0
As soon as any country becomes enlightened to the point where they see no need to go into someone else's country and kill them until they're all dead, the rest of the world will be itching for an excuse to invade them back into the stoneage.
 

savandicus

New member
Jun 5, 2008
664
0
0
War over land or war for power is evil, war to liberate and war to protect can be a necessary evil.

The problem is that war is never black and white, taking a look at israel right now it would seem they are trying to protect their citizens but some of the reported things havent exactly cast them in a favourable light. The real problem is that noone knows the real truth, noone can know what the people in charge are thinking and even good intentions can result in terrible consequences.

To quote fallout 3 because i can 'War, war never changes'
 

Iron Mal

New member
Jun 4, 2008
2,749
0
0
In theory we should only have wars in the defence of our homes and to protect the vulnerable and innocent from harm.

Since we are in the real world and not the Command and Conquer universe, this is sadly often not the case (look at most of the wars that America has been in since WWII).
 

Xpwn3ntial

Avid Reader
Dec 22, 2008
8,023
0
0
I believe it was Robert E. Lee who said, "It is a good thing war is so horrible, or we would grow too fond of it!" Meaning, war isn't going anywhere. Thing is, war is the defining aspect of the human race. Forget technology. Forget intelligence. War is the father of invention, necessity the mother. Technology is a child of war. Intelligence is applicable to most species, whereas humans conceptualize, which is different.
 

Xpwn3ntial

Avid Reader
Dec 22, 2008
8,023
0
0
darthzew said:
"There never was a good war, or a bad peace," - Benjamin Franklin.

However,

"There is a time for everything,
and a season for every activity under heaven:...
...a time to love and a time to hate,
a time for war and a time for peace."

Ecclesiastes 3: 1, 8. One of the few passages of the the Bible that I believe even atheists should listen to. Even the great Andrew Ryan quoted that one.

Back to war, I believe there is a time for it and that sometimes it's necessary. Look at the American Civil War. Without it, America would be nothing. And it was believed necessary at the time, or at least that's what Ralph Waldo Emerson believed.
Even we atheists can respect bible passages to universal topics (war, hunger, etc.). In the Civil War, a lot of people in the North didn't like Lincoln waging war against the South and his approval ratings plummeted. Today, he's considered by many people to be the best President we've ever had.
 

Healey

New member
Apr 14, 2008
118
0
0
War is often useful in maintaining the status quo, or for changing from a "Unenlightened" society to an even more "successful" one. Some wars erupt from want of resources, differences in religion or human greed, and it's these wars that should be stopped. If the war will serve a just cause (and it's not always easy to tell), it's probably necessary for the benefit of... something. More than anything, though, a war should be used to preserve a unified peace in the grand scheme of things.
While we're adding quotes: "The most disadvantageous peace is better than the most just war" - Desiderius Erasmus.
 

jasoncyrus

New member
Sep 11, 2008
1,564
0
0
Well if we look at war throughout the eons its mostly been based on a few things:

1. "You have something I want, give it to us or we'll kill you"
2. "What you worship is wrong, worship what we worship or we'll kill you."
3. "We don't like what you look like, we're going to kill you"

Those are pretty much the top 3 reasons...
 

Varchld

is drunk and disorderly.
Nov 8, 2008
446
0
0
Ace of Spades said:
Why is there no option for the quote from Ron Perlman? "War. War never Changes."
On a gaming forum, with a poll about war and it's not there? Blasphemy, Heresy!
 

Zetona

New member
Dec 20, 2008
846
0
0
"Anything war can do peace can do better."
To which I say,
"Can peace create the Internet?"
And then they say,
"But that's beside the point!"
To which I say,
"Well, yeah, war is generally bad, but it isn't all bad and it isn't all worthless."
 

vede

New member
Dec 4, 2007
859
0
0
If you're attacked, attack back until the enemy surrenders or is dead.

This is the only instance in which violence is necessary, and even in this it might be possible to triumph without violence.
 

bad rider

The prodigal son of a goat boy
Dec 23, 2007
2,252
0
0
Things can be done without war. The only reason we fight wars is to force our own views upon others. This should be done through reason, everyone can see reason it just takes some a while to be able to accept it.