Mozared said:Pro Wrestling? Isn't that the American wannabe-version of Sumo where muscled-up testosteron-filled males pretend to be knocking out other muscled-up testosteron-filled males with fake punches?
No, thanks, I'll pass on that.
You can keep going, but it isn't going to change a thing. It is too small of a genre of entertainment for most people to have a true understanding of the nature of the profession and what it entails. It would be wise of you to try and ignore it. I wish we had a mod that was a wrestling fan in this thread, however.SadakoMoose said:If I came in here and said that video games were just fat nerds playing murder simulators, you would all pretty much lynch me. What makes it o.k. for people to just dismiss and entire genre based upon hackneyed media stereotyping and half remembered, sensationalist, news reports?
How so?Xojins said:It sucks. It's shameful to real wrestling.
Due to the fact they call it wrestling when it has almost no similarity to actual wrestling, in addition to it being nothing more than a glamor show; it's not about the athletics in so-called "professional" wrestling, it's about the drama and how everyone looks. If you were an actual wrestler and took it seriously you'd understand.SadakoMoose said:How so?Xojins said:It sucks. It's shameful to real wrestling.
Does the existence of the movie shame the book?
And what sort of real wrestling?
Freestyle, GrecoRoman, Submission?
Is a shared name REALLY enough to invoke such wrath?Xojins said:Due to the fact they call it wrestling when it has almost no similarity to actual wrestling, in addition to it being nothing more than a glamor show; it's not about the athletics in so-called "professional" wrestling, it's about the drama and how everyone looks. If you were an actual wrestler and took it seriously you'd understand.SadakoMoose said:How so?Xojins said:It sucks. It's shameful to real wrestling.
Does the existence of the movie shame the book?
And what sort of real wrestling?
Freestyle, GrecoRoman, Submission?
Freestyle, Greco-Roman, Folkstyle, and Submission are all forms of actual wrestling (which is a grappling sport). All those flying kicks and hitting people with chairs is not wrestling in any form. Period.
Edit: Yes, the existence of the movie does shame the book if the book is good and the movie has absolutely nothing to do with it.
I was just curious if you even read what I wrote before, and if so, why are you a sucker for punishment?SadakoMoose said:Is a shared name REALLY enough to invoke such wrath?
I was not referring to movies based on books but to movies and books as a whole.
Does the existence of the moving picture industry shame the book industry?
No, they coexist and have NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
Besides, pro wrestling was invented in the 1920's, because amateur wrestling matches could no longer hold the attention of the viewing public.
Psychotic compulsion to debate people...chronobreak said:I was just curious if you even read what I wrote before, and if so, why are you a sucker for punishment?SadakoMoose said:Is a shared name REALLY enough to invoke such wrath?
I was not referring to movies based on books but to movies and books as a whole.
Does the existence of the moving picture industry shame the book industry?
No, they coexist and have NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
Besides, pro wrestling was invented in the 1920's, because amateur wrestling matches could no longer hold the attention of the viewing public.
Well if you're talking about movies and books as a whole it is completely irrelevant. Books don't claim to be movies, movies don't claim to be books, because they work in completely different ways. However, "professional" wrestling claims that it is wrestling, which it isn't. It's not even close. I was involved with actual wrestling for years, so it annoys me when people think that "professional" wrestling is actually wrestling.SadakoMoose said:Is a shared name REALLY enough to invoke such wrath?Xojins said:Due to the fact they call it wrestling when it has almost no similarity to actual wrestling, in addition to it being nothing more than a glamor show; it's not about the athletics in so-called "professional" wrestling, it's about the drama and how everyone looks. If you were an actual wrestler and took it seriously you'd understand.SadakoMoose said:How so?Xojins said:It sucks. It's shameful to real wrestling.
Does the existence of the movie shame the book?
And what sort of real wrestling?
Freestyle, GrecoRoman, Submission?
Freestyle, Greco-Roman, Folkstyle, and Submission are all forms of actual wrestling (which is a grappling sport). All those flying kicks and hitting people with chairs is not wrestling in any form. Period.
Edit: Yes, the existence of the movie does shame the book if the book is good and the movie has absolutely nothing to do with it.
I was not referring to movies based on books but to movies and books as a whole.
Does the existence of the moving picture industry shame the book industry?
No, they coexist and have NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
Besides, pro wrestling was invented in the 1920's, because amateur wrestling matches could no longer hold the attention of the viewing public.
Pro wrestling has not pretended to be actual wrestling for the last two decades. Only a select minority of very dumb people get this confused with amateur wrestling. Amateur wrestling and Pro wrestling can exist quite happily...Xojins said:Well if you're talking about movies and books as a whole it is completely irrelevant. Books don't claim to be movies, movies don't claim to be books, because they work in completely different ways. However, "professional" wrestling claims that it is wrestling, which it isn't. It's not even close. I was involved with actual wrestling for years, so it annoys me when people think that "professional" wrestling is actually wrestling.
Next?