Spot1990 said:Jesus, why do all the against side act like giving you're kid an open handed slap on the wrist, arse or whatever is the same thing as beating them into submission. I got whacked a handful of times whenever I really acted out. Very small children lack the understanding to know right from wrong what they can pick up on is If I do A it has positive consequences and if I do B it has negative consequences.This.EtherealBeaver said:I am despised about my fellow escapists. Hitting a child to show it right from wrong? What is wrong with you people? It is truly horrific that apparently 45% here thinks its okay to assault other people who are not only physically weaker than yourself but who also can not even take legal action and does not have the capability to defend themselves or even flee their assailant (which is what spanking your child is) to get your point across.
Tell that to my mate's niece who used to pick the dog up by it's tail and swing it. You have to learn right from wrong.Little children cant process logic as adults but they do know "nice" from "not nice"
Children need both, they need to be rewarded for good behaviour and punished for bad.and there are plenty of other options to raise your child than physical assault. You people should try and consider telling the child when it does good instead of abusing it when it screws over...That doesn't even make sense. Why did you say the punishment is 30 minutes after the actual act being punished and thus the child can't link it. But it can link praise, which I'm assuming for the sake of balance is also occurring a full 30 minutes after the act?children can not link the beating you give it 30 minutes after it did something to the actual act. What it can link is immediate feedback to behaviour, such as praise when its doing right.
For example if i misbehaved at day care and my mother found out about it later, right before i was spanked my mother would ask me if i knew why i was about to be spanked, if i didn't (which i always did but i'd try to pull a fast one on my mom) she would tell me WHY i was about to be spanked. I can't say for other parents but my mother always made sure i knew why i was being punished.
Worst thing here is that people forget that there are quite a few countries were hitting/spanking your kids is illegal. By the logic of 'some' people here, all children in all of those countries would grow up to be ill-behaved. Yet as far as I've seen our schools have some of the least bullying in the world and I havent had anything else but well behaved classmates (With one or two rather mild exceptions)Mortai Gravesend said:And you have some kind of evidence that the well behaved ones must have been spanked? Do you think being spanked gave you the ability to read minds? If so I'm gonna have the break that delusion, you really know jack shit about the kids at the stores.Matthew Cusanelli said:Walk around walmart and you'll see two types of kids:
well behaved > Disciplined and spanked
Unruly pieces of garbage > parents don't care; never spanked.
Parents are parents first, not best friends first.
P.S. there is a difference between spanking your kids and beating the crap out of your kids.
scw55 said:I lived my child life in fear when ever my mum was angry. I would cry when she directed the anger at me because I knew what was going to await me. She then smacked me and it hurt so much.
So yes, if you want your child to live in the shadow of terror every time you or your partner raises their voice, go ahead and smack your child. I would never smack my child based on my own experience.
You could argue that the nasty experience stopped me doing naughty things. No. No it didn't. I still did naughty things because when you're a child you run off impulse. And to me a lot of the naughty things I did was fair. Like stealing my sister's money because I was given a money box and I didn't understand why it had no money in it. Or breaking the French Stick in half in fury because I wanted to pack it away in the bag because it looked fun putting a bag on either end. Or cutting the cord in a bobbin winder because I had sharpened a pair of scissors (at 6 years old I worked it out) and was busy playing with them, seeing what I could cut (including myself).
There are better ways of discipline that doesn't physically hurt your child. Children are not idiots. They do listen to people. Just freccing tell them what they did wrong in a voice that says "I am telling you something and you better listen". And if you need help, ask for help.
If my kid assaulted another kid, I would find it hypocritical for me to smack them.
most children learn to talk and understand speech by 12-18 months. Are you seriously saying hitting a child younger than that will have ANY positive effect? If they are too young to understand stuff being taken away from them as punishment, then they are too young/underdeveloped to understand why you hit them.asinann said:When a child doesn't understand words, taking things away and time outs it's not about failures, it's because the child is most likely too young or they are not physiologically developed enough to understand those things. I have found that children (among the limited group of them that are being and have been raised by myself and my friends) that were not at least spanked a time or two when they were small tend to be more selfish and more defiant than children who were.Darkmantle said:If it's got to the point where a kid NEEDS to be hit, isn't that indicative of a previous failure?asinann said:Some children, especially those under 5 don't respond to time outs: they don't have the capacity to understand what they did wrong and why it was wrong. They haven't had the socialization to do so. I generally only had to sound disappointed in my daughter to get her to behave, but I have been around children that needed the occasional pop on the arse.