Exactly why the moralist in me tends to shut the fuck up when told, and look at some boobs.Shydrow said:I would like to call that into the bs zone. It is like claiming every super model and every actress and everyone in the public eye that does some kind of plastic surgery is a bad role model and will cause every kid in the world to change. I think that is the equivalent of tossing an issue down a toilet with an excuse to try and justify why you don't want it. The bigger issue is how do we teach those young women and men [who you left out so quickly cause it is still acceptable in society] To accept that who they are and what they look like is fine but to understand that some people will judge and care and insult you based off of it and how to handle those people instead of worrying about some pornstar or actress who got implants or a face lift or some other procedure.deadman91 said:I'll be honest, I'm conflicted about it.
On the one hand the moralist in me fears that the widespread availability, often depicting absolutely unrealistic situations or outright misogynistic (not to mention abusive) situations may be causing major damage to the image or beliefs about women - both by men and other women - is in fact harmful.
A lesser known example that could be argued to be evidence of this is the rise in female genital plastic surgery.... or in my mind its existence at all.
Also to make the point about men more obvious with an exmaple of "Why does a man need to be so buff all the time and when one i the public image gains weight when he was known for being packed he is called into moral question even if the way he got there was through steroids and harming his body with stressful over training?"
I'd disagree in part, as if you look at the internet, seems you can be fat, old, hairy, be what's considered 'unattractive' in a dozen different ways, and yet there'll be a fetish site out there devoted to people who want to see your bits. In that way it's more 'equal' than many other thingskouriichi said:Are we talking tenticals or....?
Oh, you mean porn in general. Well, i dont care for most of it. It always ends up zooming into the dudes butt hair. As a mostly heterosexual male, this offends my senses. And the women are always TOO perfect.
Im just not a porn person. My wife tried to get me to watch one with her to get us in the mood, but we ended up with a bowl of popcorn, laughing at the horrible plot.
I dont think that plumber ever did fix the sink.
This^Vern5 said:In all honesty, if I had the option to do high-profile porn for a while, I would do it. It's a very successful industry.scnj said:To quote an actual porn star, "I get to fuck all day and get paid for it, it's great". Apparently most of them enjoy it, and thinking they feel degraded or hurt is a misconception.Vern5 said:As long as no one is being hurt (without consent; some people like BDSM) in the process of creating the porn, I don't see anything wrong with it.
The perfect summary.kouriichi said:I dont think that plumber ever did fix the sink.
Except they aren't real people. And what about any other form of entertainment? Reading a book or watching a film; and here you aren't just seeing them have sex, you're watching their lives unfold. Isn't that voyeurism? Is it deviant when you look in someone's childhood and laugh or cry along side them? No, it's gaining a new perspective on life. I think people have always had this inherent curiosity about what it's like to be someone else. Fiction allows us to know others intimately, or even become them.Stasisesque said:The depraved, deviant nature of voyeurism is one of the reasons some do enjoy porn. The idea, even, that it is considered depraved can be arousing to some.RAKtheUndead said:I understand the purpose behind it, but I think that deriving sexual pleasure from somebody else having sex with somebody is depraved and deviant behaviour. Softcore pornography of the sort in lads' mags is more tolerable to me; at least I can imagine myself having sex with the woman in question, rather than somebody else.
I also believe that there are too many people around today with no imagination, no ability to get aroused without the crutch of pornographic material.
No, it isn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VoyeurismSurrealFactory said:Except they aren't real people. And what about any other form of entertainment? Reading a book or watching a film; and here you aren't just seeing them have sex, you're watching their lives unfold. Isn't that voyeurism? Is it deviant when you look in someone's childhood and laugh or cry along side them? No, it's gaining a new perspective on life. I think people have always had this inherent curiosity about what it's like to be someone else. Fiction allows us to know others intimately, or even become them.Stasisesque said:The depraved, deviant nature of voyeurism is one of the reasons some do enjoy porn. The idea, even, that it is considered depraved can be arousing to some.RAKtheUndead said:I understand the purpose behind it, but I think that deriving sexual pleasure from somebody else having sex with somebody is depraved and deviant behaviour. Softcore pornography of the sort in lads' mags is more tolerable to me; at least I can imagine myself having sex with the woman in question, rather than somebody else.
I also believe that there are too many people around today with no imagination, no ability to get aroused without the crutch of pornographic material.
Also, I think the "objectification" thing is silly. I don't see how anyone could take Porn seriously. And if people do, it isn't the adult industry's fault, although they could take actions to help this.
Yes it is.Stasisesque said:No, it isn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyeurism
You honestly believe voyeurism means to gain a new perspective on someone's life from watching their lives unfold?KafkaOffTheBeach said:Yes it is.Stasisesque said:No, it isn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyeurism
The article you just posted kinda proves it.
Even with the hamhanded wiki writing and definitions.
^Bam.Stasisesque said:You honestly believe voyeurism means to gain a new perspective on someone's life from watching their lives unfold?KafkaOffTheBeach said:Yes it is.Stasisesque said:No, it isn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyeurism
The article you just posted kinda proves it.
Even with the hamhanded wiki writing and definitions.
Voyeurism is a sexual activity. It is finding sexual pleasure in watching others engage in sexual or intimate acts. It is not just watching someone. Not as a technical term, certainly not in the context I presented it.
Voyeurism is a sexual activity - yes.Stasisesque said:You honestly believe voyeurism means to gain a new perspective on someone's live from watching their lives unfold?
Voyeurism is a sexual activity. It is finding sexual pleasure in watching others engage in sexual or intimate acts. It is not just watching someone. Not as a technical term, certainly not in the context I presented it.