DoPo said:
LoathsomePete said:
Basically the only thing you really need to say is "Hey, remember that time when the United States banned alcohol and nobody ever drank again and there wasn't a total rise in organized crime, corruption, and violence?"
Wow, I do applaud you. That is a perfect way to counter those arguments. You sir win an internetz.
I concur. When you're looking at any sweeping proposition like that, it isn't enough to say "what would happen if we did it?", you have to say "can we do it?", and in the case of pornography, the answer is no. When you try to ban something so ingrained in culture, and something that is so EASY to manufacture, you can't actually do it - at least, not without creating 1984-world, but I think that's going a little far to stop the evils of porn. If you can't effectively ban Alcohol, a substance, or even today, if you can't effectively ban other illegal drugs IN THIS DAY AND AGE, which have to be produced, how can you ban something for which you only need a camera? Wait, never mind, it would be outsourced, and then, assuming the ban withstood the outcry of job loss, it would just be a problem of preventing distribution, which, again, is pretty damn hard.