Andy Farren said:
Can I get a gaming PC, that will be current for the next 6 years, for under £300?
No. No I can't.
True, that would be a stretch, but you could take all the money you save on those $60 AAA titles during things like the Steam summer sale and your yearly multiplayer subscription fee's, and use those savings to build a very nice PC.
As far as this goes, as much as I oppose the Xbone 180 with all that microsoft has done, it would be very bad not just for the industry, but for the gamers if it outright died. Lots of people like to say "There are lots of options though, get a PS4" but just because its an option for you, doesn't mean its an option for them.
I'll clarify my position right now by stating I have an excellent Gaming PC (ALL HAIL THE GLORIOUS PC MASTER RACE), I've had an Xbox 360 since launch day of the console (The nicest feeling controller I've ever handled, hands down) And a PlayStation 3 for the last year (Soo many awesome exclusives. Don't even start me on the last of us) so I've been around most of the hardware. Not mobile devices though, I'm too spoiled on most modern games to derive a lot of amusement from handhelds.
So far as I see it, the PC is still the "Hardcore" Gaming machine. These things take time, money, and usually a good bit of tech knowledge to keep running at their peak, and reward you with the best graphics and more flexibility. But they are fickle beasts, and prone to failure if you don't know how to maintain them. I might find it incredibly natural to dig through my games files and alter the config before launching it to fix a render issue that's keeping me from seeing stuff right (I'll admit that's only even been a problem in indie titles though) but a less skilled PC user would just call that a write off and get frustrated trying to fix it. Does that make PC gamers better than others though? God no. PC gamers are good at PC gaming. You give me a PSP and throw me into a title and I'm flopping about like a mad idiot because I have no clue what I'm doing and its weird for me to have my screen between my controls, its throwing me off (Personal experience here XD) and I'll usually rage and blame it on "Awkward control schemes" Yet the person who owns the console never struggles with any of it, its just natural to them. Apples and Oranges here
The Consoles are the low maintenance version of gaming. Not necessarily "casual" as titles like dark souls can attest too, but they give you the assurances of "You put a game in, you play it". I say low maintenance because they are all now asking for account registrations and subscription fee's, but that's not a major hurdle for anybody. Most people are used to the idea of paying for a service and registering information with it. With my consoles, I can buy whatever Dudebro shooter mess there is on the market right now, and go online with my friends, and know that we can all play it together. And that is comforting. Consoles are consistant with there behavior. If I need an update to play Broshooter: Reloaded then the console just says so and starts downloading it.
But when we start to rip pieces out of this balance, some might think "Well then those gamers will just come and bask in the joy of (Insert preference here)!" And some will, that is true, but its the people who don't have that option that would be left in the dark. Maybe their hands are too big for mobile gaming, maybe they find the PlayStation controller incredibly awkward and can't get over that hurdle (Yes, third party controllers, but lots of people don't even know those exist, to be honest) and will end up just deciding that gaming isn't worth the hassle, no matter how much they enjoy it.
Gaming is a recreational activity. That is what its always been, and that is what it will always be. And when we start removing peoples preferred way to enjoy such a hobby, some will just walk away. And that will hurt the industry much, much more than the console itself collapsing. Ecosystems can rearrange and bring in new challengers and competitions. But if the consumer itself is forced away, then there is no market yearning for something new. And then the stagnation sets in.
Just because you think your solution is the best of the solutions, doesn't mean its the best for somebody else. Food for thought.