If the news does repoty on any controversy it will be abou that girl's spectacular cleverage rather than the political commentary, they didnt complain about the first one surprisingly even though you could kill children
LOl you wimpDustyDrB said:I'm wondering if it will be controversial if its a lot less creepy than the first game. I may actually be able to play Infinite because it doesn't look so scary (yes, I'm a wimp and couldn't last past hour one of BioShock).
Apperently it's okay to kill creepy children. :/spartandude said:If the news does repoty on any controversy it will be abou that girl's spectacular cleverage rather than the political commentary, they didnt complain about the first one surprisingly even though you could kill children
It was a damn typo and why the hell does it matter if I call it the Video Game Industry, which is 17 letters on my keyboard an 19 if you count the spaces or just call it the medium, a nice 6 letter word. Maybe your just mocking it as a typo which I'm unaware of, fine be a Grammer Nazi. How about I compromise with you and call it the Industry, which has 11 letters? I mean honestly why do you care?mikev7.0 said:Forgive me but what "left wind" nutjob is currently an enemy of the "medium"? (Whyowhy can't people just still say the Video Game industry? Everytime somebody bemoans the state of the industry it sounds like someone just beat the crap out of a psychic....)Blatherscythe said:Bit of a gamble here. If they do things right it's a big step for the medium, if they fuck it up we all look like fools and the medium suffers and has new political enemies other than right/left wind nutjobs.
No really, eating walnuts actually builds courage. Psedu-science fact!DustyDrB said:I'm jittery. I can't help it. Things jumping out at me will make me freak the fuck out (I've hit people, and I mean really hit for talking to me when I didn't know they were behind me. Call my mom and ask her. I felt bad about that one...). And then expecting it to happen again will give me anxiety.Blatherscythe said:Here take these, they'll help.DustyDrB said:I'm wondering if it will be controversial if its a lot less creepy than the first game. I may actually be able to play Infinite because it doesn't look so scary (yes, I'm a wimp and couldn't last past hour one of BioShock).
![]()
Speculate away! That reasoning makes a lot of sense really. It's just that I know good, smart people who subscribe to that ideology (Conservativism) and they just wave away the things she said that are directly opposed to their beliefs and just say "Well it's not ALL genius...." I guess I can't talk much though because while I like parts of what Ayn Rand says, I can't agree with her on all of it (for one, I'm a Deist.) so I kind of see what they are saying, but I can admit that part of Rand's philosophy offends me, they act like she hung the moon and just "was having a thing." when she wrote "that" part. Lame.Gethsemani said:Your guess is as good as mine, I think. If I am allowed to speculate I assume it is because Conservatism in the USA is quite different from conservatism in Europe. An american conservatist wants to preserve the ideals of the US constitution as interpreted by the conservatist. This means lots of personal freedom, small government and the spirit that one is the master of your own destiny. In those particular areas Objectivism and Neo-Conservatism in the USA ar quite similar.mikev7.0 said:About Nitpick 2? I know that what you say is true. I've even seen ads for her own school of objectivism. Yes Objectivism is still quite politically popular and not just ironically but paradoxically popular with Neo-Conservatives.
What I want to know is WHY is it true? Why do groups that quite favor neo-conservatives have objectivism as a favored ideology when if objectivism has any enemy according to it's founder (other than the irrational, period.) it would be the conservative ideology? So much so that Ms. Rand spends a good ten minutes ripping conservatives a new one in her "Address to America." She does it well too.
To be fair to the Neo-Cons, they aren't the first people to cherry pick parts out of an ideology to fit their own agenda. Objectivism in their interpretation is just so much worse because it leaves out the few redeeming points that Rand actually put into Objectivism to begin with.
Okay I agree with that but what U.S. President did she almost help assasinate? I've never heard that before.Imp Emissary said:Simple answer. Conservatives can love Ms. Rand because they just "ignore" the parts of what she said that they don't like. (example: She hated them.) They don't ever talk about how she was atheist, what she thought about sex, or that she actually was a bit of an anarchist and almost helped to assassinate one of the US presidents. They do this so they can try and use someone who was in life an enemy, and use her as an icon to mean whatever they want.mikev7.0 said:About Nitpick 2? I know that what you say is true. I've even seen ads for her own school of objectivism. Yes Objectivism is still quite politically popular and not just ironically but paradoxically popular with Neo-Conservatives.Gethsemani said:Nitpick: BioShock 2 was a deconstruction of extreme utilitarianism. Lamb's idea was a literal "sacrifice one for the many" kind of deal and her ideals gained ground with the surviving deniziens of Rapture after Ryan's die hard individualism had proven to be a failure. To be honest, I found nothing confusing or hard to follow about BioShock 2's storyline. It wasn't as well told as its' predecessors but it was quite easy to follow if you paid attention.Not G. Ivingname said:The only games that have made a big political statement has been Bioshock 1 and 2. However, Bioshock 1 was a counter-argument against Objectivism, the political theory that is libertarism taken to it's largest extreme, has very few practitioners now-a-day's. Bioshock 2's sparse and confusing story made it unclear to most people it was a counter-argument against Communism, not helped that Bioshock 2's communistic cult would make Marx eat his own beard at the idea.
Nitpick 2: Objectivism has quite many followers today, most notably in the far right of the Republican Party and the Tea Party in the USA. It is also a favourite philosophy of many corporate leaders, especially from the USA. Beyond the borders of America and England, it is a largely unknown philosophy however.
What I want to know is WHY is it true? Why do groups that quite favor neo-conservatives have objectivism as a favored ideology when if objectivism has any enemy according to it's founder (other than the irrational, period.) it would be the conservative ideology? So much so that Ms. Rand spends a good ten minutes ripping conservatives a new one in her "Address to America." She does it well too.
What's that you say? Anyone who knows anything about her could see through their lie?
LA LA LA! Can't hear you! LA LA LA!
Actually I don't THAT much, I just wanted to know which "Left wing nutjob" was an enemy to Video Games?Blatherscythe said:It was a damn typo and why the hell does it matter if I call it the Video Game Industry, which is 17 letters on my keyboard an 19 if you count the spaces or just call it the medium, a nice 6 letter word. Maybe your just mocking it as a typo which I'm unaware of, fine be a Grammer Nazi. How about I compromise with you and call it the Industry, which has 11 letters? I mean honestly why do you care?mikev7.0 said:Forgive me but what "left wind" nutjob is currently an enemy of the "medium"? (Whyowhy can't people just still say the Video Game industry? Everytime somebody bemoans the state of the industry it sounds like someone just beat the crap out of a psychic....)Blatherscythe said:Bit of a gamble here. If they do things right it's a big step for the medium, if they fuck it up we all look like fools and the medium suffers and has new political enemies other than right/left wind nutjobs.
It's Propaganda. It's purpose is to brainwash the masses into believing its message. In this case it's trying to inspire nationalistic feelings. It's not supposed to be subtle. Take a look at some World War 2 propaganda, especially the stuff in Nazi Germany. There's nothing subtle about it.Ian Caronia said:However, I also think that image is the most grotesque attempt at being irreverent I've seen since Duke Nukem Forever, though at least DNF was just being silly to be silly (and stuck to poking at other franchises, so you could laugh if you wanted and not lose your IQ).Not G. Ivingname said:
_This? This can't be in Bioshock Infinite. It's...
Stupid. Incredibly stupid. Insultingly stupid. This is either a very lame joke that not even Rockstar would put into a GTA game, or it's a sad realization of how the developers will handle the subject matter you're talking about.
Wow. Just...wow. No subtlety at all. Put it this way: That image is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of how I think games should handle complex subject matter. One sided and absolutely lazy. Don't seem to recall the original being so...so...
Where's that overused "AMERICA! FUCK YEAH!" song to go with that pic?
EDIT: Nevermind. I'm thoroughly disappointed in this game now >_>
You misunderstood me -- I meant that Rapture was a city founded on a belief system, just as I suspect Colombia will be; not that they were both based on the same thing. Secondly, I've only watched a grand total of one Infinite trailer, and I left with the impression that the inhabitants were racist nationalists that did indeed produce "ridiculous and offensive hyperbole": I never considered it representative of Constitutionalism at all. My original post was asking if they could clarify whether they were annoyed at the poster itself (in which case, we're meant to find it offensive), or how the poster represented its ideas (a one-sided view of a belief system).Soggy_Popcorn said:What you just typed is exactly why the game's political narrative is stupid. You assume that Objectivism and Constitutionalism are founded on "racist, die-hard, 1920s [nationalist]" ideals.Captain Booyah said:I'm confused, are you disgusted at what the poster is promoting, or how it's promoting it? 'Cause I thought that the point of Colombia was that it was going to be inhabited by racist, die-hard, 1920s(?) nationalists, and given that the city is probably going to have been founded at least partly on those ideals (like Rapture and Objectivism), they're not going to be shy about their excessive patriotism. Or was it just the stereotype you didn't like? Or how it translates to real-world issues? Gah, stupid Infinite. Trying to be all deep and political and stuff. >_<
And therefore that the ridiculous and offensive hyperbole that is that poster and the rest of the game's portrayal of Constitutionalism must be accurate.
Ok Captain, let me tell you a story. I don't know it by heart, but I can tell you most of it.mikev7.0 said:Okay I agree with that but what U.S. President did she almost help assasinate? I've never heard that before.Imp Emissary said:Simple answer. Conservatives can love Ms. Rand because they just "ignore" the parts of what she said that they don't like. (example: She hated them.) They don't ever talk about how she was atheist, what she thought about sex, or that she actually was a bit of an anarchist and almost helped to assassinate one of the US presidents. They do this so they can try and use someone who was in life an enemy, and use her as an icon to mean whatever they want.mikev7.0 said:About Nitpick 2? I know that what you say is true. I've even seen ads for her own school of objectivism. Yes Objectivism is still quite politically popular and not just ironically but paradoxically popular with Neo-Conservatives.Gethsemani said:Nitpick: BioShock 2 was a deconstruction of extreme utilitarianism. Lamb's idea was a literal "sacrifice one for the many" kind of deal and her ideals gained ground with the surviving deniziens of Rapture after Ryan's die hard individualism had proven to be a failure. To be honest, I found nothing confusing or hard to follow about BioShock 2's storyline. It wasn't as well told as its' predecessors but it was quite easy to follow if you paid attention.Not G. Ivingname said:The only games that have made a big political statement has been Bioshock 1 and 2. However, Bioshock 1 was a counter-argument against Objectivism, the political theory that is libertarism taken to it's largest extreme, has very few practitioners now-a-day's. Bioshock 2's sparse and confusing story made it unclear to most people it was a counter-argument against Communism, not helped that Bioshock 2's communistic cult would make Marx eat his own beard at the idea.
Nitpick 2: Objectivism has quite many followers today, most notably in the far right of the Republican Party and the Tea Party in the USA. It is also a favourite philosophy of many corporate leaders, especially from the USA. Beyond the borders of America and England, it is a largely unknown philosophy however.
What I want to know is WHY is it true? Why do groups that quite favor neo-conservatives have objectivism as a favored ideology when if objectivism has any enemy according to it's founder (other than the irrational, period.) it would be the conservative ideology? So much so that Ms. Rand spends a good ten minutes ripping conservatives a new one in her "Address to America." She does it well too.
What's that you say? Anyone who knows anything about her could see through their lie?
LA LA LA! Can't hear you! LA LA LA!
SNIP: Your not worth a damn suspension.mikev7.0 said:Actually I don't THAT much, I just wanted to know which "Left wing nutjob" was an enemy to Video Games?Blatherscythe said:It was a damn typo and why the hell does it matter if I call it the Video Game Industry, which is 17 letters on my keyboard an 19 if you count the spaces or just call it the medium, a nice 6 letter word. Maybe your just mocking it as a typo which I'm unaware of, fine be a Grammer Nazi. How about I compromise with you and call it the Industry, which has 11 letters? I mean honestly why do you care?mikev7.0 said:Forgive me but what "left wind" nutjob is currently an enemy of the "medium"? (Whyowhy can't people just still say the Video Game industry? Everytime somebody bemoans the state of the industry it sounds like someone just beat the crap out of a psychic....)Blatherscythe said:Bit of a gamble here. If they do things right it's a big step for the medium, if they fuck it up we all look like fools and the medium suffers and has new political enemies other than right/left wind nutjobs.
As for the typo, I wasn't aware that putting something in quotation marks was mocking it. In fact I was taught in my english class that it meant you were questioning it. Which was all I was doing. As for your (and many others) use of Medium, there are just a whole lot more words, many of which are a LOT less used, that make it not as confusing. Yes, industry is a much better word, video games have been around for quite awhile and they've done it without a rebranding. In fact that's just what I and everyone I have ever really met calls "the Industry": "Video Games." Short. Simple. A definition that makes it tough to NOT know what is being discussed. So if voicing the opinion that I think the word medium has been done to death means I need to be compared to a group that was bent on genocide? Uh, well, that's YOUR opinion oh ye' who take such offense at being "mocked" (see that? It means I question not mock your use of the word mock. Confused yet? Wait it gets betta'....)
By the way if you ARE going to label people using such an extreme word (Nazi) I'm at least going to earn it.
You spelled "grammar" wrong.
Because it's a white guy shooting black people. I don't see it as racist due to the setting of the game being Africa and the plot kinda requiring that setting.Psycho Cat Industries said:So first,how is Resident Evil 5 racist?I'm sorry I just have to ask this.
As for the politics,don't get the game if you don't like it.Even if the political speak strikes me as bad,I can still shotgun the guy who says it.
Exactly,how do people rush to conclusions so quickly when the answer is RIGHT THERE.Nieroshai said:Because it's a white guy shooting black people. I don't see it as racist due to the setting of the game being Africa and the plot kinda requiring that setting.Psycho Cat Industries said:So first,how is Resident Evil 5 racist?I'm sorry I just have to ask this.
As for the politics,don't get the game if you don't like it.Even if the political speak strikes me as bad,I can still shotgun the guy who says it.
Metaphor time: people LOVE to b**ch and moan about the wrapping paper on their present to the point that they don't care to tear it open. In fact, they haven't even looked at the box, they let some guy on a website tell them what the wrapping paper looked like, and even that all that's in the box is more wrapping paper. Long story short: people are sheep who feel what they're told.Psycho Cat Industries said:Exactly,how do people rush to conclusions so quickly when the answer is RIGHT THERE.Nieroshai said:Because it's a white guy shooting black people. I don't see it as racist due to the setting of the game being Africa and the plot kinda requiring that setting.Psycho Cat Industries said:So first,how is Resident Evil 5 racist?I'm sorry I just have to ask this.
As for the politics,don't get the game if you don't like it.Even if the political speak strikes me as bad,I can still shotgun the guy who says it.