Prediction: Bioshock Infinite will be controversial for the game's internal politics.

Recommended Videos

spartandude

New member
Nov 24, 2009
2,721
0
0
If the news does repoty on any controversy it will be abou that girl's spectacular cleverage rather than the political commentary, they didnt complain about the first one surprisingly even though you could kill children
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
DustyDrB said:
I'm wondering if it will be controversial if its a lot less creepy than the first game. I may actually be able to play Infinite because it doesn't look so scary (yes, I'm a wimp and couldn't last past hour one of BioShock).
LOl you wimp ;)

I think this looks amazing and I agree with you I think it's going to awaken some debate over politics. It's nice that they would put something in this deep for gamers and it will be interesting after playing it to discuss the implications of the plot.

I think they are showing the extremes of each political movement, the control and militarism of the founders and the anarchy and violence of the vox populi. I'm guessing as Dewitt (sp?) you will almost feel liek a normal person of today caught between this liberal and conservative struggle that we experience even here in Britain (I won't into the details of the murky politics of the last election...) The fact that he mentions a student movement in that video makes me think back to the riots earlier this year.

It will be interesting to play indeed.

spartandude said:
If the news does repoty on any controversy it will be abou that girl's spectacular cleverage rather than the political commentary, they didnt complain about the first one surprisingly even though you could kill children
Apperently it's okay to kill creepy children. :/
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
mikev7.0 said:
Blatherscythe said:
Bit of a gamble here. If they do things right it's a big step for the medium, if they fuck it up we all look like fools and the medium suffers and has new political enemies other than right/left wind nutjobs.
Forgive me but what "left wind" nutjob is currently an enemy of the "medium"? (Whyowhy can't people just still say the Video Game industry? Everytime somebody bemoans the state of the industry it sounds like someone just beat the crap out of a psychic....)
It was a damn typo and why the hell does it matter if I call it the Video Game Industry, which is 17 letters on my keyboard an 19 if you count the spaces or just call it the medium, a nice 6 letter word. Maybe your just mocking it as a typo which I'm unaware of, fine be a Grammer Nazi. How about I compromise with you and call it the Industry, which has 11 letters? I mean honestly why do you care?
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
DustyDrB said:
Blatherscythe said:
DustyDrB said:
I'm wondering if it will be controversial if its a lot less creepy than the first game. I may actually be able to play Infinite because it doesn't look so scary (yes, I'm a wimp and couldn't last past hour one of BioShock).
Here take these, they'll help.

I'm jittery. I can't help it. Things jumping out at me will make me freak the fuck out (I've hit people, and I mean really hit for talking to me when I didn't know they were behind me. Call my mom and ask her. I felt bad about that one...). And then expecting it to happen again will give me anxiety.
No really, eating walnuts actually builds courage. Psedu-science fact!
 

Katana314

New member
Oct 4, 2007
2,299
0
0
I really doubt any news media will take notice. They watch gaming in 5-second snippets. If something controversial isn't made immediately clear through that (sex, violence, ripping someone's head off), then they dismiss it. It's certainly not as if games have PLOT or any CONTINUING THEME.

Bottom line: If a character is going to insult fox news, make sure the sentence where he does so is at least 6 seconds long.
 

mikev7.0

New member
Jan 25, 2011
598
0
0
Gethsemani said:
mikev7.0 said:
About Nitpick 2? I know that what you say is true. I've even seen ads for her own school of objectivism. Yes Objectivism is still quite politically popular and not just ironically but paradoxically popular with Neo-Conservatives.

What I want to know is WHY is it true? Why do groups that quite favor neo-conservatives have objectivism as a favored ideology when if objectivism has any enemy according to it's founder (other than the irrational, period.) it would be the conservative ideology? So much so that Ms. Rand spends a good ten minutes ripping conservatives a new one in her "Address to America." She does it well too.
Your guess is as good as mine, I think. If I am allowed to speculate I assume it is because Conservatism in the USA is quite different from conservatism in Europe. An american conservatist wants to preserve the ideals of the US constitution as interpreted by the conservatist. This means lots of personal freedom, small government and the spirit that one is the master of your own destiny. In those particular areas Objectivism and Neo-Conservatism in the USA ar quite similar.

To be fair to the Neo-Cons, they aren't the first people to cherry pick parts out of an ideology to fit their own agenda. Objectivism in their interpretation is just so much worse because it leaves out the few redeeming points that Rand actually put into Objectivism to begin with.
Speculate away! That reasoning makes a lot of sense really. It's just that I know good, smart people who subscribe to that ideology (Conservativism) and they just wave away the things she said that are directly opposed to their beliefs and just say "Well it's not ALL genius...." I guess I can't talk much though because while I like parts of what Ayn Rand says, I can't agree with her on all of it (for one, I'm a Deist.) so I kind of see what they are saying, but I can admit that part of Rand's philosophy offends me, they act like she hung the moon and just "was having a thing." when she wrote "that" part. Lame.
 

mikev7.0

New member
Jan 25, 2011
598
0
0
Imp Emissary said:
mikev7.0 said:
Gethsemani said:
Not G. Ivingname said:
The only games that have made a big political statement has been Bioshock 1 and 2. However, Bioshock 1 was a counter-argument against Objectivism, the political theory that is libertarism taken to it's largest extreme, has very few practitioners now-a-day's. Bioshock 2's sparse and confusing story made it unclear to most people it was a counter-argument against Communism, not helped that Bioshock 2's communistic cult would make Marx eat his own beard at the idea.
Nitpick: BioShock 2 was a deconstruction of extreme utilitarianism. Lamb's idea was a literal "sacrifice one for the many" kind of deal and her ideals gained ground with the surviving deniziens of Rapture after Ryan's die hard individualism had proven to be a failure. To be honest, I found nothing confusing or hard to follow about BioShock 2's storyline. It wasn't as well told as its' predecessors but it was quite easy to follow if you paid attention.

Nitpick 2: Objectivism has quite many followers today, most notably in the far right of the Republican Party and the Tea Party in the USA. It is also a favourite philosophy of many corporate leaders, especially from the USA. Beyond the borders of America and England, it is a largely unknown philosophy however.
About Nitpick 2? I know that what you say is true. I've even seen ads for her own school of objectivism. Yes Objectivism is still quite politically popular and not just ironically but paradoxically popular with Neo-Conservatives.

What I want to know is WHY is it true? Why do groups that quite favor neo-conservatives have objectivism as a favored ideology when if objectivism has any enemy according to it's founder (other than the irrational, period.) it would be the conservative ideology? So much so that Ms. Rand spends a good ten minutes ripping conservatives a new one in her "Address to America." She does it well too.
Simple answer. Conservatives can love Ms. Rand because they just "ignore" the parts of what she said that they don't like. (example: She hated them.) They don't ever talk about how she was atheist, what she thought about sex, or that she actually was a bit of an anarchist and almost helped to assassinate one of the US presidents. They do this so they can try and use someone who was in life an enemy, and use her as an icon to mean whatever they want.

What's that you say? Anyone who knows anything about her could see through their lie?

LA LA LA! Can't hear you! LA LA LA!
Okay I agree with that but what U.S. President did she almost help assasinate? I've never heard that before.
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Wait, what kind of person will get riled up about the political views of fictional characters?
In any case, I doubt there will be any big thing about it, no one made a fuss about Ezio's blatant anti-organised-religion speech in ACII, and that was probably played by more people than this will be.
 

mikev7.0

New member
Jan 25, 2011
598
0
0
Blatherscythe said:
mikev7.0 said:
Blatherscythe said:
Bit of a gamble here. If they do things right it's a big step for the medium, if they fuck it up we all look like fools and the medium suffers and has new political enemies other than right/left wind nutjobs.
Forgive me but what "left wind" nutjob is currently an enemy of the "medium"? (Whyowhy can't people just still say the Video Game industry? Everytime somebody bemoans the state of the industry it sounds like someone just beat the crap out of a psychic....)
It was a damn typo and why the hell does it matter if I call it the Video Game Industry, which is 17 letters on my keyboard an 19 if you count the spaces or just call it the medium, a nice 6 letter word. Maybe your just mocking it as a typo which I'm unaware of, fine be a Grammer Nazi. How about I compromise with you and call it the Industry, which has 11 letters? I mean honestly why do you care?
Actually I don't THAT much, I just wanted to know which "Left wing nutjob" was an enemy to Video Games?

As for the typo, I wasn't aware that putting something in quotation marks was mocking it. In fact I was taught in my english class that it meant you were questioning it. Which was all I was doing. As for your (and many others) use of Medium, there are just a whole lot more words, many of which are a LOT less used, that make it not as confusing. Yes, industry is a much better word, video games have been around for quite awhile and they've done it without a rebranding. In fact that's just what I and everyone I have ever really met calls "the Industry": "Video Games." Short. Simple. A definition that makes it tough to NOT know what is being discussed. So if voicing the opinion that I think the word medium has been done to death means I need to be compared to a group that was bent on genocide? Uh, well, that's YOUR opinion oh ye' who take such offense at being "mocked" (see that? It means I question not mock your use of the word mock. Confused yet? Wait it gets betta'....)

By the way if you ARE going to label people using such an extreme word (Nazi) I'm at least going to earn it.

You spelled "grammar" wrong.
 

run_forrest_run

New member
Dec 28, 2009
618
0
0
Ian Caronia said:
Not G. Ivingname said:
However, I also think that image is the most grotesque attempt at being irreverent I've seen since Duke Nukem Forever, though at least DNF was just being silly to be silly (and stuck to poking at other franchises, so you could laugh if you wanted and not lose your IQ).
_This? This can't be in Bioshock Infinite. It's...
Stupid. Incredibly stupid. Insultingly stupid. This is either a very lame joke that not even Rockstar would put into a GTA game, or it's a sad realization of how the developers will handle the subject matter you're talking about.

Wow. Just...wow. No subtlety at all. Put it this way: That image is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of how I think games should handle complex subject matter. One sided and absolutely lazy. Don't seem to recall the original being so...so...

Where's that overused "AMERICA! FUCK YEAH!" song to go with that pic?

EDIT: Nevermind. I'm thoroughly disappointed in this game now >_>
It's Propaganda. It's purpose is to brainwash the masses into believing its message. In this case it's trying to inspire nationalistic feelings. It's not supposed to be subtle. Take a look at some World War 2 propaganda, especially the stuff in Nazi Germany. There's nothing subtle about it.
 

Captain Booyah

New member
Apr 19, 2010
318
0
0
Soggy_Popcorn said:
Captain Booyah said:
I'm confused, are you disgusted at what the poster is promoting, or how it's promoting it? 'Cause I thought that the point of Colombia was that it was going to be inhabited by racist, die-hard, 1920s(?) nationalists, and given that the city is probably going to have been founded at least partly on those ideals (like Rapture and Objectivism), they're not going to be shy about their excessive patriotism. Or was it just the stereotype you didn't like? Or how it translates to real-world issues? Gah, stupid Infinite. Trying to be all deep and political and stuff. >_<
What you just typed is exactly why the game's political narrative is stupid. You assume that Objectivism and Constitutionalism are founded on "racist, die-hard, 1920s [nationalist]" ideals.

And therefore that the ridiculous and offensive hyperbole that is that poster and the rest of the game's portrayal of Constitutionalism must be accurate.
You misunderstood me -- I meant that Rapture was a city founded on a belief system, just as I suspect Colombia will be; not that they were both based on the same thing. Secondly, I've only watched a grand total of one Infinite trailer, and I left with the impression that the inhabitants were racist nationalists that did indeed produce "ridiculous and offensive hyperbole": I never considered it representative of Constitutionalism at all. My original post was asking if they could clarify whether they were annoyed at the poster itself (in which case, we're meant to find it offensive), or how the poster represented its ideas (a one-sided view of a belief system).
 

Imp_Emissary

Mages Rule, and Dragons Fly!
Legacy
May 2, 2011
2,315
1
43
Country
United States
mikev7.0 said:
Imp Emissary said:
mikev7.0 said:
Gethsemani said:
Not G. Ivingname said:
The only games that have made a big political statement has been Bioshock 1 and 2. However, Bioshock 1 was a counter-argument against Objectivism, the political theory that is libertarism taken to it's largest extreme, has very few practitioners now-a-day's. Bioshock 2's sparse and confusing story made it unclear to most people it was a counter-argument against Communism, not helped that Bioshock 2's communistic cult would make Marx eat his own beard at the idea.
Nitpick: BioShock 2 was a deconstruction of extreme utilitarianism. Lamb's idea was a literal "sacrifice one for the many" kind of deal and her ideals gained ground with the surviving deniziens of Rapture after Ryan's die hard individualism had proven to be a failure. To be honest, I found nothing confusing or hard to follow about BioShock 2's storyline. It wasn't as well told as its' predecessors but it was quite easy to follow if you paid attention.

Nitpick 2: Objectivism has quite many followers today, most notably in the far right of the Republican Party and the Tea Party in the USA. It is also a favourite philosophy of many corporate leaders, especially from the USA. Beyond the borders of America and England, it is a largely unknown philosophy however.
About Nitpick 2? I know that what you say is true. I've even seen ads for her own school of objectivism. Yes Objectivism is still quite politically popular and not just ironically but paradoxically popular with Neo-Conservatives.

What I want to know is WHY is it true? Why do groups that quite favor neo-conservatives have objectivism as a favored ideology when if objectivism has any enemy according to it's founder (other than the irrational, period.) it would be the conservative ideology? So much so that Ms. Rand spends a good ten minutes ripping conservatives a new one in her "Address to America." She does it well too.
Simple answer. Conservatives can love Ms. Rand because they just "ignore" the parts of what she said that they don't like. (example: She hated them.) They don't ever talk about how she was atheist, what she thought about sex, or that she actually was a bit of an anarchist and almost helped to assassinate one of the US presidents. They do this so they can try and use someone who was in life an enemy, and use her as an icon to mean whatever they want.

What's that you say? Anyone who knows anything about her could see through their lie?

LA LA LA! Can't hear you! LA LA LA!
Okay I agree with that but what U.S. President did she almost help assasinate? I've never heard that before.
Ok Captain, let me tell you a story. I don't know it by heart, but I can tell you most of it.

So, as I said Rand was a anarchist back in her youth, and she had a boyfriend who was one too. Her boyfriend gets it in his head that he's going to help the "anarchist movement", and he thinks the best way is to assassinate the president. Well she is onboard with this whole thing, and they start up the "plan". They think the best way to do it is for him to just go up to the guy when he's out in public, and just shoot him point blank. Problem is, they don't have a gun, or the money to get one. However, Rand comes up with an idea to get it. I am pretty sure it was just her idea because if her boyfriend did know about it well....then he was even more nuts than I thought.

She decides to get the money by...how to put it? Using her "womanly wiles".....If you didn't get what I ment then I'll just say it now. She tried to whore herself. So, by herself she put on the "whore uniform" of that time and goes out at night. However, she just can't do it. She breaks down, and runs back inside. Then she give herself a little peptalk. She says to herself that if her boyfriend can be willing to give his life for this, then I can at least give my body. So she goes to try again.

This time a guy comes up to her, but not for what you think. He must of been very perceptive (or she must have been very obvious) because the guy goes up to her and tells her something along the lines the she really isn't the type of girl to be doing this. Then the guy gives her some money, and tells her something like stay off the streets and try to get a better life. Well Rand was overjoyed. She got the money, and she didn't even have to do anything to get it. However, the grand skeem failed. I can't remember what exactly, but her boyfriend either got put in jail for some other crime or something like that. Point is, Rand's boyfriend was nolonger able to do the deed. So, Rand gave it up, and started on her way to what she became later.

Its funny really. Rand's life of telling the world about a lifestyle that can be very simply summed up as; "I got mine Jack. F@#k the rest of you.", may not have been if not for some guy giving help to a very desperate girl he didn't know, and for nothing in return.

So that's the story, or at least how I heard it. You could probably find a more detailed verizon, but that's most the of it.
 

Hamhandderhard

New member
Jun 15, 2011
46
0
0
IIRC somebody asked Levine about the whole "Columbia=Tea Party" and he said that wasn't his intention. Besides, Bioshock wasn't critical about Objectivism, it just told how people can't blindly follow ideals. Like Ryan ultimatly became the very thing he preached out against; a tyrant
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
mikev7.0 said:
Blatherscythe said:
mikev7.0 said:
Blatherscythe said:
Bit of a gamble here. If they do things right it's a big step for the medium, if they fuck it up we all look like fools and the medium suffers and has new political enemies other than right/left wind nutjobs.
Forgive me but what "left wind" nutjob is currently an enemy of the "medium"? (Whyowhy can't people just still say the Video Game industry? Everytime somebody bemoans the state of the industry it sounds like someone just beat the crap out of a psychic....)
It was a damn typo and why the hell does it matter if I call it the Video Game Industry, which is 17 letters on my keyboard an 19 if you count the spaces or just call it the medium, a nice 6 letter word. Maybe your just mocking it as a typo which I'm unaware of, fine be a Grammer Nazi. How about I compromise with you and call it the Industry, which has 11 letters? I mean honestly why do you care?
Actually I don't THAT much, I just wanted to know which "Left wing nutjob" was an enemy to Video Games?

As for the typo, I wasn't aware that putting something in quotation marks was mocking it. In fact I was taught in my english class that it meant you were questioning it. Which was all I was doing. As for your (and many others) use of Medium, there are just a whole lot more words, many of which are a LOT less used, that make it not as confusing. Yes, industry is a much better word, video games have been around for quite awhile and they've done it without a rebranding. In fact that's just what I and everyone I have ever really met calls "the Industry": "Video Games." Short. Simple. A definition that makes it tough to NOT know what is being discussed. So if voicing the opinion that I think the word medium has been done to death means I need to be compared to a group that was bent on genocide? Uh, well, that's YOUR opinion oh ye' who take such offense at being "mocked" (see that? It means I question not mock your use of the word mock. Confused yet? Wait it gets betta'....)

By the way if you ARE going to label people using such an extreme word (Nazi) I'm at least going to earn it.

You spelled "grammar" wrong.
SNIP: Your not worth a damn suspension.
 
Nov 12, 2010
1,167
0
0
So first,how is Resident Evil 5 racist?I'm sorry I just have to ask this.
As for the politics,don't get the game if you don't like it.Even if the political speak strikes me as bad,I can still shotgun the guy who says it.
 

Nieroshai

New member
Aug 20, 2009
2,940
0
0
I'm absolutely certain it's going to do exactly what 1 did and have BOTH political factions be wrong.
 

Nieroshai

New member
Aug 20, 2009
2,940
0
0
Psycho Cat Industries said:
So first,how is Resident Evil 5 racist?I'm sorry I just have to ask this.
As for the politics,don't get the game if you don't like it.Even if the political speak strikes me as bad,I can still shotgun the guy who says it.
Because it's a white guy shooting black people. I don't see it as racist due to the setting of the game being Africa and the plot kinda requiring that setting.
 
Nov 12, 2010
1,167
0
0
Nieroshai said:
Psycho Cat Industries said:
So first,how is Resident Evil 5 racist?I'm sorry I just have to ask this.
As for the politics,don't get the game if you don't like it.Even if the political speak strikes me as bad,I can still shotgun the guy who says it.
Because it's a white guy shooting black people. I don't see it as racist due to the setting of the game being Africa and the plot kinda requiring that setting.
Exactly,how do people rush to conclusions so quickly when the answer is RIGHT THERE.
 

Nieroshai

New member
Aug 20, 2009
2,940
0
0
Psycho Cat Industries said:
Nieroshai said:
Psycho Cat Industries said:
So first,how is Resident Evil 5 racist?I'm sorry I just have to ask this.
As for the politics,don't get the game if you don't like it.Even if the political speak strikes me as bad,I can still shotgun the guy who says it.
Because it's a white guy shooting black people. I don't see it as racist due to the setting of the game being Africa and the plot kinda requiring that setting.
Exactly,how do people rush to conclusions so quickly when the answer is RIGHT THERE.
Metaphor time: people LOVE to b**ch and moan about the wrapping paper on their present to the point that they don't care to tear it open. In fact, they haven't even looked at the box, they let some guy on a website tell them what the wrapping paper looked like, and even that all that's in the box is more wrapping paper. Long story short: people are sheep who feel what they're told.