AceDiamond post=18.73955.816102 said:
searanox post=18.73955.816089 said:
Sounds like punishing thieves for thievery to me. What's the issue?
There's punishment and then there's just being a dick, this is the latter. This is basically saying "now you HAVE to accept our invasive DRM or lose everything!" not specifically in those words but...that could be one of the issues.
plus it's rich people taking everyhing from the not-so-rich. I will feel wonderful in knowing that because of cracking down on piracy, Lars Ulrich could finally buy his 10th Platinum-coated HumVee.
Actually it's rich people taking from not-so-rich
thieves. Bit of a difference there. If you have more much money than I, do I then have the right to take your stuff, as long as you still have lots of other stuff? This is saying you have to accept our invasive DRM OR not enjoy our work product. You still have choices - deal with the DRM, steal the work product and hope you don't get caught, or do without it. I wanted Bioshock; I did not get Bioshock because of the invasive DRM. That does NOT give me the right to steal it.
To those defending stealing as long as you have no intention of selling the stolen property, would it be okay if I steal your car and take it for a joy ride as long as I bring it back? What about if I steal your MP3 player and later bring it back? Can I come into your home and use it while you are out? You still have your car, your MP3 player, your home, so that should be okay, right?