El Danny said:
katsa5 said:
El Danny said:
katsa5 said:
OMG, he brought up abortion. Well, I'm a woman and I'm very pro-life. I don't think its right to blame and thereby harm the baby for something he/she/it/potato has no control over. But that doesn't matter. In regards to this topic, I wish to quote another comedian Ron White. "Here's the Ron White heightened state of awareness system. It only has two heightened states of awareness. Go find a helmet. Put on the damn helmet."
-_- Time to put on the damn helmet.
It's called a foetus because it isn't a baby, the difference is a foetus isn't actually 'alive' in the sense that it's human. It doesn't learn, think, even feel pain, in fact the foetus stage is far closer to a plant then an animal.
Criminalising abortion because it prevents potential children from coming into existence is as stupid as legalising rape for the same reason.
To be honest, I had heard that first argument and never liked it, personally. Weren't we all a fetus at one point?
As for the second. . . .I fail to see the connection. Rape culture=child safety? Other than the child being a victim which is not the topic here, I don't see how its quid-pro-quo. Please elaborate.
We were also a sperm, doesn't stop millions of frustrated teenage boys giving the ol' bishop a bash. That's billions of potential lives in one sitting, one teenage boy can end far more potential lives in one sitting then abortion ever could.
By defending yourself from an 'unwanted' partner, you're also might be preventing a 'childs' chance of life.
In order to avoid hypocrisy abortion is a nessicary evil, especially seeing criminalising it won't stop it, just make abortion far more dangerous.
But isn't that a little extreme? For both sides? For example, I've heard the point made that 'masturbation is abortion and thereby murder' because of wasted material; but that's ridiculous. May as well hold it against a couple that tried for years with no success. I'd admire they steps being taken, but trying to make one set of reasoning fit for every situation is not necessarily a matter of avoiding hypocrisy, its just not trying hard enough. Reminds me of the crippling thought process that SFDebris spoke of in this 'Prime Directive Discussion'. (^^ Go find him on blip. He's smart and funny!)
Rape is a terrible, terrible thing. If I had my way, I'd say "kill the rapist!" every time. But I know not to, because that rapist has a family of his/her own that now had to deal with their son/daughter did. Same for if a child is involved. All I can do is hope that adoption is chosen for the innocent victim, but its not my decision. I'm not the one bearing the child.
If I may use myself as an example, I have a little daughter on the way myself. I remember seeing that tiny being and hearing that tiny heartbeat when it was only a month in utero; watching it wiggle made me see just how much that little one depended on me. And yet I can only imagine the strange feeling it must inflict on a woman who sees that same little darling and think of nothing but that horrible event. Makes me wonder what that little one would think too, if it could know.
So I agree with you that abortion shouldn't be 'criminalized' otherwise you'll have to include the all extremes including medical-necessary abortion (but for god's sake, let's not talk about that! Too close to home!), I just wish it was an option that didn't have to exist. I wish adoption was more discussed than it is. I wish alternatives would be more discussed. Surely the resources used to fight this issue would be better off finding alternatives. Surely there has to be a balance to protect both mother AND child alike. One step at a time, I guess.