Project Natal (Xbox 360 's Will killer) what games would you like to see ?
- Thread starter Xephino
- Start date
Recommended Videos
But that's the thing, the technology is superior, but it's hardly a case of whether or not it can compete or not. The Wii has established itself with motion control for nearly four years now, and this has just been announced, which is going to come bundled with a console next year, and still needs to iron out its bugs.Xephino said:
If best technology was how companies get ahead, the PS3 would be ahead of the 360 and the Wii, and the Zune would be ahead of the iPod. People said that the PS3 coming out would mean that the 360 couldn't compete yet look where we are.
Every man and his dog knows about the Wii and most of them want one, but Natal is going to need to establish itself in the industry and show a lot of the audience that the Wii has captured, why they would want a second console with motion control, or a first console with motion control that has less games. In my honest opinion I don't think this is going to make the 360 spike past the Wii in a year.
Sidestepping the pointless Wii vs. 360 debate that seems to have sprung up, I would like to see Gears of War on Natal, where you actually have to take cover behind your sofa and make chanisaw-y motions. It would be horribly tiring but you can't deny it would awaken the 6-year-old boy in us all.
lol that would be interesting,although a little difficult to pull i think and i know people always take things to the extreme i was making a comparison in technolgy not sales (wii is winning that race with a clear gap between them and 360)Ps3 is kinda the turtle i reckon i was a psx fanboy a tone point but not with the line up they have atmGuerrillaClock said:
That's why I said something like house of the dead, that arcade game they have in the movie theaters and stuff-the game moves for you, but you aim the gun and shoot zombies and stuffClashero said:
The game would probably make you march in place to walk and stick your hands out to turn, or something else that's just as silly.Reg5879 said:
Although I don't see a lot of fighting games happening because that's a surefire way to cause broken bones and furniture.
The first problem I thought of when I first saw Natal was movement.
But I think you can get around that will different motions for walking. Like you could use leaning to make your character move that direction, or put a foot out to a side to move that way, or use like in place jogging movement, or use typical skateboard movements like dragging a foot in a direction to generate movement in that direction, etc.
You could even do movement with other binds, like even using one hand to decide where you move too.
There's so many options when you move from an interface where 2-8 fingers are involved to whole body inputs like Natal.
But I think you can get around that will different motions for walking. Like you could use leaning to make your character move that direction, or put a foot out to a side to move that way, or use like in place jogging movement, or use typical skateboard movements like dragging a foot in a direction to generate movement in that direction, etc.
You could even do movement with other binds, like even using one hand to decide where you move too.
There's so many options when you move from an interface where 2-8 fingers are involved to whole body inputs like Natal.
/sarcasmKrakyn said:
This is going to be the case. While NATAL is definately the next step in motion control for games, what your going to end up with is the same pile of crap that the Wii has now because they are easy to make and integrate with the technology and they will sell like crazy. There will be a few good games, like House of the Dead: Overkill on the Wii but I still predict Master Chief's Shooting Gallery to be out within 3 months of NATAL being released.
I assume it would be pointless to mention that the eye-toy was basically a web camera, right? And that it's slightly less technologically advanced (italics is cruise control for sarcasm)? And that Natal is actually very technologically innovative? And that the eye-toy was a blatant rip off of the Dreameye for Dreamcast? And the Wii is currently selling better than the Bible so even Jesus is weeping at how badly he's getting outsold?comadorcrack said:
Yeah, your opinion is well reasoned, intelligent, and doesn't make you sound completely ignorant.
[/cruise control]
"And then everybody strokes each other!"
On the guy that says that natal is so technologically advanced: Still not going to work, gimmick for you to chew on and toss aside. It is to make it seem like the 360 is the best thing since sliced bread to sell more consoles. Not much else. Plus. Just like touch screens it is just easier to use a keyboard and mice. Same way that is is easier to just use a controller instead of motion control.
On the guy that says that natal is so technologically advanced: Still not going to work, gimmick for you to chew on and toss aside. It is to make it seem like the 360 is the best thing since sliced bread to sell more consoles. Not much else. Plus. Just like touch screens it is just easier to use a keyboard and mice. Same way that is is easier to just use a controller instead of motion control.
Some sorta RPG. I can't tell you how many times i've been involved in talks and just want to go, "Yeah yeah, whatever! I just want to make things go boom!" Or suggest a better stragety to a battle plan.
Maybe you can just march in place to move around. And you know, turn your body to go left and right...you know...stuff...Clashero said:
A fencing game, a Strategy game where the interface looks like an overhead command view and that means I have to do cool hand things like in Minority Report, and a Star Wars game where you wave a handle for lightsabre and use your other hand to do force powers.