PSP

Recommended Videos

Zera

New member
Sep 12, 2007
408
0
0
What are your thoughts on this system? Is it a good system, an epic failure or wasted potential? I bought one not too long ago along with my friend so we can play Final Fantasy Tactics together. The game turned out to be good, but then I began to have afterthoughts about it. But before I say that, I wanna see what you think of the system. Ill have my say as soon as you have yours.
 

wellington

New member
Oct 31, 2007
22
0
0
I really like the PSP as a piece of technology, if it were actually open to free development and not being constantly locked down by system updates I would like it more(but I understand why that can't work for business reasons). Having said that, my PSP sits idle more than any other system I own due to infrequent decent, fun games. Add in the fact that some of the good games are made unplayable by awkward controls and the general bad design of the button/ analog stick placement. So overall I might like it but I can definitely say that if I could go back and do it over again I probably wouldn't have bought it.
 

RTZ

New member
Nov 25, 2007
5
0
0
Consider the PSP to be a PDA made by a game company, except it's a lot better looking, and can be hacked up more then an enemy in a Tales game. The video playing isn't especially phenomenal, with the bad battry life to go hand in hand with it, but the game market on it is getting larger, which is nice, because it has less ports of the PS consoles, and more original ideas. So all in all, it's actully worth paying $200 for the core package. Give it a 7.5/10.
 

LordOmnit

New member
Oct 8, 2007
572
0
0
Honestly I don't have one, but from an outside point of view, I'd say that it is at least worth looking at. When it first came out I dismissed it and it's pathetic repertoire as mediocre at best, but later it seemed to be a handy little device for surfing, but still more akward than carrying around a 14.5 inch laptop due to the character-insertion screen suckage. More recently (however) games have been being released that have made me much more seriously consider getting it. But, I'm still too low on money, so it ain't happening.
 

hooloovoonate

New member
Nov 7, 2007
18
0
0
It really depends what you're looking for, in the end. Though it lacks creative titles (not entirely, just by comparison to the DS), there are some truly strong games that you can't find elsewhere. It is not a complete failure like some were claiming during its second year. The titles are continually improving, God of War and Secret Agent Clank are coming out next year and there are some amazing puzzle and racing games available as well. You won't get great games often but there are some that truly make the system worth it. I never use my PSP for other media, though, and if you're going to, I suppose it will only hope its case.
 

Admonished

New member
Sep 12, 2007
14
0
0
Complete failure? No I'd say not. Has its ups (mutltiple funtions and graphics) and downs (not too many games I consider to be "fun", cramps my hands every once in a while). If you wanna talk failed handhelds start a topic about the N-Gage....
 

ComradeJim270

New member
Nov 24, 2007
581
0
0
My response to anyone comparing the DS to the PSP (this is not neccesarily directed at you, Zera... more at a general audience, though it should still more or less answer the question): I think it's mostly a matter of preference. The main concern when choosing one over the other is games. The PSP's library of games is quite different from that of the DS, for one thing. There are few DS games which interest me, so I got a PSP over a DS. If you don't like DS games, you shouldn't buy a DS. If you don't like PSP games, you shouldn't buy a PSP. Why buy a game system that doesn't have games you like? That's the main concern, but if that doesn't lead to a decision, the other factors become more important.

There is certain functionality which the PSP posseses and the DS does not (though some of it can be added to the DS), but this functionality may not matter to some people...

Do you want a portable that plays music and video more or less out of the box? If not, you won't care that the PSP can do this and the DS can't. I do, but again, that's just personal preference. Do you care if you can browse the web on it? The PSP can do this out of the box, but the browser is clunky and not all that great. The DS doesn't come with a browser, but you can put Opera on it, which blows the PSP browser out of the water. The stylus is a much better tool for surfing the web, too. I rarely use the PSP browser, so it's not a big deal for me. Don't really do multi-player either, but the PSP seems to possess more functionality in that regard. Want something that can interface well with other hardware? The PSP does this quite well. It can interface, to varying degrees, with other Sony hardware, with an Xbox 360, and with computers (works with both Windows and Mac OS X, maybe others but I have no experience there)... just about anything with a USB port. To my knowledge the DS does not do so well in this department, but again, you have to ask yourself if you actually give a rat's ass about this particular aspect of the handheld.

How about battery life? Pitiful on the PSP, because the screen is bigger and brighter (you can dim it, but this is a poor comromise), the system is more powerful and thus needs more juice, and spinning a UMD is far less efficient than reading a cartridge. The DS is very efficient and lasts a long time on a full charge. I don't really mind. You might. Note that the PSP can be placed into sleep mode at any time, reducing power consumption by 99%. Battery life varies wildly... play online with the screen at full brightness and it will go in a few hours... use it as an MP3 player and it'll last all day and night.

How about durability? The DS is very resilient and doesn't really have moving parts. The PSP is relatively fragile in regards to physical shock, and does have some moving parts. The screen is vulnerable to scratches (protect your investment with adhesive screen covers.. thin, transparent plastic that covers the screen and will protect it from damage... replace as needed... these should not be considered optional). Dropping a PSP is a big deal, dropping a DS is not. I never use my PSP without the wrist strap. Ever. Doesn't matter if I'm sitting on the couch. I keep it in its pouch when not in use.

How about the games? UMDs are bigger than cartridges. The can get scratched if not in a case or some kind of sleeve. Memory? You'll likely want to buy some for a PSP. Up to you how much. I personally like the fact I can choose how much memory I want, can store different things on different sticks (I only have 2... but if I wanted I could put savegames on one, and media on the other). I like the fact the memory sticks can be used with other stuff if need be. Does this appeal to you, or is it just a waste of time or money? In the latter case, it's not an issue with the DS.

Do you sweat much while gaming? My hands tend to sweat slightly. If you get a PSP, be aware that they smudge like you wouldn't believe. I have little personal experience with the DS Lite (it's too small for my gorilla hands!) aside from time spent working at a game store, but I don't think it can compete with the PSP in terms of smudge-magnetism. The DS isn't even on the scale, there. Thankfully, moving the PSP's power switch into the 'HOLD' position will effectively disable all the buttons on the PSP, allowing you to wipe off those smudges whenever you please. Still irritating, though. If you're anal-retentive, you may find the amount of time it can keep you occupied is slightly increased due to smudge removal breaks.

In short, the games are quite different, the PSP is far better for media but far worse for web-surfing. It uses more power and needs to be treated with a little bit of care (nothing unreasonable, but considerably more than a DS... the DS is built like a tank). It is prone to harmless but irritating smudges which you can wipe off in a few seconds, if they bother you it all. It works well with other hardware, and is much more versatile in regards to memory.

As for games... the PSP is interesting in that most of its games, in my book, fall into one of three categories; 'garbage', 'meh' or 'wow, this is a good game'. Some of the 'meh' games are not actually bad, they just have narrow appeal. You'll have to brave the dangers of that category yourself! As for the third category... the PSP... again, just IMO... makes up for its otherwise underwhelming library with these gems (some of these metaphorical gems are not perfectly cut or polished, but they're still gems).

Killzone: Liberation is astounding... the boss fights are very, very hard, but I reccomend it in spite of that. It's hard to compare it to anything... it's a pseudo-isometric shooter, built for the ground up to be played on the PSP.

Lumines is a true masterpiece. At the risk of being executed for heresy, I will say now that I prefer it to Tetris.

Syphon Filter: Dark Mirror shattered my perceptions of what is possible on a portable system. It's very rare that I can find nothing bad to say about a game... but this is one of those occasions. If you like shooters, you will probably like this.

GTA: Vice City Stories is one of those unpolished gems. The controls are a bit troublesome at times, and sometimes it almost seems too much for the PSP (occasional audio hiccups and trouble keeping up a times in terms of graphics), but it really is GTA... if you like GTA, you will almost certainly like this.

Hm, Wipeout Pure is great if you like racing games... actually, it's pretty good even if you generally don't. It's the only game in its genre which I actually enjoy. You can find very cheap used copies, so it's worth a shot.

Those are the ones that I am quickest to praise and to reccomend, but there are other games on the PSP which have also recieved stellar reviews. These games, in my opinion, more than make up for all the dog crap in the PSP library. I would reccomend that you give them a try before writing off your PSP. If you don't like them, PSP probably isn't for you, but they are held in high regard for good reason.
 

Zera

New member
Sep 12, 2007
408
0
0
RatedB said:
Complete failure? No I'd say not. Has its ups (mutltiple funtions and graphics) and downs (not too many games I consider to be "fun", cramps my hands every once in a while). If you wanna talk failed handhelds start a topic about the N-Gage....
Ouch...
 

Arbre

New member
Jan 13, 2007
1,166
0
0
Zera said:
What are your thoughts on this system? Is it a good system, an epic failure or wasted potential? I bought one not too long ago along with my friend so we can play Final Fantasy Tactics together. The game turned out to be good, but then I began to have afterthoughts about it. But before I say that, I wanna see what you think of the system. Ill have my say as soon as you have yours.
The poll:

1. Above average.
2. Sucks like hell.
3. Sucks like hell x infinite.

Ah, besides, I love racing games and Wipeout Pure sucks. A poser. Only the OST rocks.
 

Copter400

New member
Sep 14, 2007
1,813
0
0
I think the PSP is pretty good, but it has its faults, just like every console available and ever made, computers included. The graphics are generally good, good to the extent that when I recieved my PSP, playing it on the way home, I said, 'I'd go as far to say that the graphics are better than the PS2's.' But, there are times where I've wished for a second analog stick, and I can't say I'm particularly wowed by the movie capabilities.
 

hobartuk

New member
Dec 7, 2007
62
0
0
there was no potential at all, it's nothing to the DS, handheld technology including the ipod and ds has been all about innovation, and sony just stuck a screen on a controller and hoped we'd wanna watch Hitch in the car and get carsick
 

hickwarrior

a samurai... devil summoner?
Nov 7, 2007
429
0
0
PSP is good, but it is because i own a game called T:DR(Tekken:Dark resurrection, and for those that reallly don't know, it's almost the same game as tekken 5.) and i like it, i play it still after acquiring it(from my parents, but that will change), and that is about a few good months ago. Maybe it is because i don't have money to buy new games myself.

The DS seems to appeal to me more, but that's because i usually owned nintendo systems(errm, only the SNES and the gameboy family.) and those games tend to be generally fun(allthough i like to give kingdom hearts a try, not that chain of memories monster...).

I am using the PSP as an MP3 player, but i think i like a more compact MP3 player. Then i'd just call it the MP3 brick for about 130 euros. However, i don't use it much today the day. The MP3 part that is.

Overall, i think PSP and DS appeal to me, both of them. Maybe yo ushould try that, but i'd recommend DS first. That system has alot of nice games.
 

ComradeJim270

New member
Nov 24, 2007
581
0
0
Wow, lots of hate for the PSP here. Honestly, it's probably not accurate to say its library of decent games is as small as some of these posts would imply. It does have fewer good games than the DS I suppose, but I have found that many of the good DS titles simply do not appeal to me... in fact the whole DS game library has this sort of esoteric feel for me, making me think "well, this is supposed to be a good game right here... but... I just don't get it". Like I have said, it depends on what you are looking for. The PSP fits the bill for ME, but this may not be the case for YOU.
 

CyberAkuma

Elite Member
Nov 27, 2007
1,055
0
41
The problem with the PSP -as far as I can see it is that SONY stopped entirely caring for it.
The games that have been released for it are essentially PS2-hand-me-downs which is kind of sad concidering the potential it had.
If we entirely look at platform exclusives for the PSP, then sadly it is an epic failure since the few exclusive game titles that is out for it is just nothing great.

It is so sad because the PSP is pretty much a PS2 smacked into one little neat handheld system and it had so much potential to deliver but it seems like it just fell short on the delivery of games. The few friends that I know of that owns a PSP play emulators and similar stuff to it rather than PSP games which I think is kind of sad.

Another thing that is lacking is the PSP connectivity with the SONY consoles out there. Nintendo has always been good on that side connecting their handheld system with their consoles and as such giving better value and innovative ideas. The GBA with the NGC gae some appeal at least while I have really not seen any innovative ideas between the PS2/PS3 and the PSP. It is kind of hard comparing the NDS with the PSP concidering that this is really Nintendos what? 3rd handheld console (not counting the gazillion different versions of the GameBoy that is)

Also, the NDS is the worlds most sold handheld console which even makes it a harder comparison. Even at launch it was stated that the NDS wasn't made to compete with the PSP - the NDS was made to replace the GBA, which comes to another point I have - the backwards compability.
Nintendo was smart in developing 100% backwards compability with its old handheld console since they knew people would want to continue to play their GBA games. So if you've bought a lot of GBA games, then the NDS is specially attractive.

As much as ComradeJim made a nice comparison between the, he forgot some other stuff the NDS has - Rumble Pack. This sounds like some gimmicky idea, but it is really nice in some games that use it. (mostly the Metroid franchaise)

As always, Nintendo has had a strong library of licensed games and for those people that like it, it is an obvious choice. Mario, Wario, Zelda, Metroid, Yoshi and all is still there.

I might have lost track of what I was supposed to post here, but I thikn that comparing them both is kind of hard. But if you look at console exclusives then the PSP is really dissapointing.
 

hickwarrior

a samurai... devil summoner?
Nov 7, 2007
429
0
0
maybe the last line was your point brought to here, but i think you(CyberAkuma) meant something else.

the NDS is especially hard to compare with the PSP, especially that with the NDS, nintendo tried to target a wider audience. Like elderly people, or people that just don't play games. And it seems to be working for them, since they sold alot(don't know how much exactly.).

and the titles are also why i suggested that the NDS should be bought first, since that system has alot of better games, compared to the PSP, IMO. I haven't played games, for certain, but it seems the main genres(it seems too realistic nowadays, again IMO.) don't appeal that much to me on the psp. I wanted one because of gitaroo man and got sonic rivals, tales of eternia and tekken: dark resurrection. It seems that 2 off these are ports, the other 2 aren't(but i think eternia was in japan first) but are rather mediocre.

It's sad, but i like the NDS better, if i get the good games for it(admittedly, those are still the same franchises, but they are good, nonetheless.).
 

laikenf

New member
Oct 24, 2007
764
0
0
I like my PSP,like all systems some games just blow, but there some truly great games (just got monster Hunter Freedom 2 and it's just so addictive). I'ts just a matter of what you want to play, PSP games are a bit more PS2 like (or arcade- ish if you will) while DS games are a bit more unique.
 

Ranzel

New member
Oct 7, 2007
61
0
0
In my opinion, handheld systems should embody one thing: Simple fun. I honestly think that handheld systems shouldn't TOUCH bloody games, like God of War or GTA. Handheld systems should be about simple, on the go fun. They should bring out the kid, not the axe murderer. The PSP just has the wrong games coming out. If the PSP was made by Nintendo, and had the exact same games coming out as the DS, I'd by the PSP. That seems obvious, but it's the truth.